>> This is a good approach, but please one reminder. The DAT structures
>> for virtual disk in storage address spaces, including PGMBKs, are not
>> pageable (user space PGMBKs are). And prior to z/VM 5.3.0, they must
>> reside in real memory below 2GB. So 275GB of vdisk would be more than
>> 2GB of
tely by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Melin
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 6:20 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Is 275GB of VDISK s
12/03/2007 07:30 PM
Subject
Re: Is
275GB of VDISK stupid?
lf Of Rob
van der Heij
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:04 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Is 275GB of VDISK stupid?
On Dec 3, 2007 7:54 PM, Bill Bitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a good approach, but please one reminder. The DAT structures
> for vi
On Dec 3, 2007 7:54 PM, Bill Bitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a good approach, but please one reminder. The DAT structures
> for virtual disk in storage address spaces, including PGMBKs, are not
> pageable (user space PGMBKs are). And prior to z/VM 5.3.0, they must
> reside in real memo
This is a good approach, but please one reminder. The DAT structures
for virtual disk in storage address spaces, including PGMBKs, are not
pageable (user space PGMBKs are). And prior to z/VM 5.3.0, they must
reside in real memory below 2GB. So 275GB of vdisk would be more than
2GB of memory require
