Mark Post wrote:
On 5/4/2012 at 03:17 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Yes, my experience too is that build requirements in the SLES packages are
often incomplete. It probably works for SUSE because they probably build in
a "almost everything" type of system.
Not really. The automated build servi
>>> On 5/4/2012 at 03:17 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
> Yes, my experience too is that build requirements in the SLES packages are
> often incomplete. It probably works for SUSE because they probably build in
> a "almost everything" type of system.
Not really. The automated build service uses a
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Srivastava, Sagar wrote:
> Finally I was able to compile it- it's just that ncurses-devel was needed
> before it can be compiled. I did not find anything on it documented anyware
> in requirements - on their site/package/readme etc.
>
>
Thank you for reminding me w
Finally I was able to compile it- it's just that ncurses-devel was needed
before it can be compiled. I did not find anything on it documented anyware in
requirements - on their site/package/readme etc.
Sagar
On 05/03/12 12:48, Srivastava, Sagar wrote:
>
> Thanks to Brent and Barton for your r
riginal Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Srivastava, Sagar
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 9:48 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] MIPS increase after SLES11 SP1 patches
Thanks to Brent and Barton for your reply, I was no
It should be noted "top" accepts a parm to adjust the report frequency - all
the way down to fractions of a second. *All* sampling based monitors have
their weaknesses - especially those that run in userspace.
However, for those of us that developed our performance tuning/debugging
skills in a trad
U
> Subject: Re: MIPS increase after SLES11 SP1 patches
>
>
> Thanks to Brent and Barton for your reply, I was not successful in compiling
> PowerTOP in SLES11 (s390), probably sources need some tweaking since it is
> Intel platform centric. If anyone has compiled it successfully, I w
On 05/03/12 12:48, Srivastava, Sagar wrote:
Thanks to Brent and Barton for your reply, I was not successful in
compiling PowerTOP in SLES11 (s390), probably sources need some tweaking
since it is Intel platform centric. If anyone has compiled it
successfully, I will be glad to know.
See whethe
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Srivastava, Sagar wrote:
>
> I wanted the group to know my solution just in case someone else
> encounters the same problem. Thanks for going through my long posting.
>
>
Good news, and thank you for sharing the outcome with us. It probably would
have been caught by
solution just in case someone else
encounters the same problem. Thanks for going through my long posting.
Sagar
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Brent Kincer
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 3:08 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
If you investigate the ESALNXP report provided by ZVPS, you will see a
cron job with your latest "patches", and not before that. One just
needs good tools
Srivastava, Sagar wrote:
We implemented latest patches on our SLES11 SP1 systems recently
Now all the zLINUX guest are using almo
Have you tried using powertop to investigate? Sure the tool was intended on
tracking power consumption, but it's very useful for seeing what is waking
up your guests.
Just a thought...
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Srivastava, Sagar wrote:
>
>
>
>
> We implemented latest patches on our SLES11
We implemented latest patches on our SLES11 SP1 systems recently
Now all the zLINUX guest are using almost 8 - 10 IFL mips extra per
Guest - that is increasing our load on the z/VM LPARs by 300 mips .
Unfortunately this is not so visible from the guest level and hence
difficult to find t
13 matches
Mail list logo
