Rick Troth wrote:
But you're right - I do go around yast ;-)
I do too: YaST is handy, but don't let it rule your Linux world.
Thankfully, most of what YaST does is adjusting of standard files,
so in this case, if you do go around it, you simply have to know
all of the files to fiddle with
NoëL AntoniO wrote:
Yes, for some reason, my /etc/postfix/main.cf had "inet_interfaces =
127.0.0.1 ::1", instead of "inet_interfaces = all". Fixing this fixed
the problem. Thanks!
My boxes sometimes get new network interfaces; I don't necessarily want
my server so
> But you're right - I do go around yast ;-)
I do too: YaST is handy, but don't let it rule your Linux world.
Thankfully, most of what YaST does is adjusting of standard files,
so in this case, if you do go around it, you simply have to know
all of the files to fiddle with.
-- R;
--
Yes, for some reason, my /etc/postfix/main.cf had "inet_interfaces =
127.0.0.1 ::1", instead of "inet_interfaces = all". Fixing this fixed the
problem. Thanks!
Noël Antonio
- Original Message -
From: "John Summerfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
It turns out that changing the inet_interfaces from "127.0.0.1 ::1" to "all"
fixed the problem.
But you're right - I do go around yast ;-)
Noël Antonio
- Original Message -
From: "David Boyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, Novemb
;s not
listening to remote requests?
It does. That's the problem.
And I did restart postfix numerous times and even rebooted :-(
Also, I finally received a Delivery Failure Report after 3 days:
"Deferred: Connection refused by "
Regards,
Noël Antonio
- Original Me
> However, I noticed it says "localhost.smtp". Does this mean it's not
> listening to remote requests?
That just tells you it's listening on the interface identified as
"localhost". Usually that's 127.0.0.1.
> Also, I finally received a Delivery Failure Report after 3 days:
> "Deferred:
> Connec
g to remote requests?
And I did restart postfix numerous times and even rebooted :-(
Also, I finally received a Delivery Failure Report after 3 days: "Deferred:
Connection refused by "
Regards,
Noël Antonio
- Original Message -
From: "John Summerfield" <[EMAIL PR
Obvious question, but did you stop and restart postfix after updating the file?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NoëL AntoniO
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:36 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: postfix
Mark, I
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: postfix
I'm setting up a postfix server. It sends mail perfectly. I just don't
receive any mail. And so far none of the email I've sent TO the postfix
server have returned with an error. Is there some th
netstat shows it is) but again, no luck (connection refused).
Were you able to resolve this problem?
Noël Antonio
- Original Message -
From: "Mark D Pace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: postfix
I'm setting up a postfix serv
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark D Pace
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:53 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: postfix
I'm setting up a postfix server. It sends mail perfectly. I just don't
receive any mail. And so far none of the email I've sent TO the postfix
server h
In /etc/sysconfig/mail (assuming SUSE), did you set
SMTPD_LISTEN_REMOTE="yes" ? (and then run SuSEconfig and recycle
postfix..) Otherwise, it will only listen to requests from
"localhost"
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:53:27 -0500, Mark D Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm setting up a postfix server. It sends mail perfectly. I just don't
receive any mail. And so far none of the email I've sent TO the postfix
server have returned with an error. Is there some thing I can sent in a
typical email client to trace what my email is doing? I'
Postfix is driving me crazy...
I want to use the "myorigin = $mydomain" option (i.e sub @wellsfargo.com
for @servername.wellsfargo.com on outgoing mail)
If I put that in there, it seems to ignore .forward files completely and
changes both the sender and the recipient to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> RedHat >= 7.3 is shipped with postfix. I don't see any exim package on a
> nearby RH80 mirror.
Quite right. I've had that fixation for a while;-(.
I've been using versions of Clark Connect which are built on RHL 7.x,
and _t
with Red Hat Linux 8.0. The _only_ reason I suggest this as the
> first-choice replacement is that it is reasonable to suppose Red Hat
> will include it in the next release of RHL for S/390 & zSeries, and so
> any additional maintenance issues will terminate at that time.
RedHat >= 7.3
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Adam Thornton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:26:21AM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
> > I suspect that there is an unistall parameter like RPM --uninstall
> > available?
>
> I dunno about webmin, but, indeed, rpm --uninstall (or rpm -e) would do
Not rpm --uninstall
, and the action
> status of 'pending' does little for my confidence. Hence my sudden and extreme
> interest in Postfix as a replacement MTA. Here is what I tried to send to the
> existing thread:
Please, encourage your email client to wrap lines. That was rather hard
t
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:07:12PM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
> Actually, a third choice proved to be backreving Postfix to
> postfix-1.1.7-6.src.rpm which allowed a rebuild requiring more of the
> standard RPMs from the MCS mirror site for this distribution. I guess
> it woul
Actually, a third choice proved to be backreving Postfix to postfix-1.1.7-6.src.rpm
which allowed a rebuild requiring more of the standard RPMs from the MCS mirror site
for this distribution. I guess it would be safe to say that progress on s390 will tend
to lag that of i386.
Now it appears
mpany dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Kenneth Illingsworth
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:26:21AM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
> I suspect that there is an unistall parameter like RPM --uninstall
> available?
I dunno about webmin, but, indeed, rpm --uninstall (or rpm -e) would do
the trick.
Adam
confidence. Hence my sudden and extreme interest in
Postfix as a replacement MTA. Here is what I tried to send to the existing thread:
-
Choice 2 below sounds good. Unfortunately, I do not know
>>>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:58:06PM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
> The last package that I needed to install Postfix onto a RH v7.2 i
> virtual s390 machine was something called 'alternatives'. I was unable
> to find anything on my favorite MCS mirror, and lik
e: both
> sendmail and postfix have /usr/sbin/sendmail .
Not exactly; it was aimed at allowing the user to choose which of a set of
packages (which provide compatible interfaces) should be used to provide
that interface on the system. /usr/sbin/sendmail is a good example. While
several packa
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:58:06PM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
> > The last package that I needed to install Postfix onto a RH v7.2 i
> > virtual s390 machine was something called 'alternatives'. I was unable
> > to find anything on my favorite MCS mir
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:58:06PM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
> The last package that I needed to install Postfix onto a RH v7.2 i
> virtual s390 machine was something called 'alternatives'. I was unable
> to find anything on my favorite MCS mirror, and likewise was u
The last package that I needed to install Postfix onto a RH v7.2 virtual s390 machine
was something called 'alternatives'. I was unable to find anything on my favorite MCS
mirror, and likewise was unable to find any s390 RPMs. I did managed to find a src.rpm
for 'alternatives
I seem to
> run into a lot of type-2 packages as a result.
>
The trick in the case of postfix is probably to try to rebuild the
package from rawhide
--
Tzafrir Cohen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
x Against HTML Mail
/ \
Message-
From: Per Jessen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Postfix
-snip-
Yes and no. Building from source doesn't make you a developer - but it does
make
you much more aware of what goes on in your system though :-)
To a l
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:58:30 -0500, Post, Mark K wrote:
>
>Until things in the Linux world improve greatly, you need to use the RPMs
>that your distribution creator provides, or build your own RPMs from source
>and install the resulting binaries.
In my experience with Linux on i386, you will event
Ken,
Red Hat doesn't package postfix with their distribution. So, you're not
going to find an RPM for it on Red Hat's servers, or any of the mirrors.
It sounds like what you're doing is grabbing RPMs for a Linux distribution
other than Red Hat, and trying to install them o
We are running RH V7.2 on a Linux s390 VM. There is a great mirror site at
ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/redhat/redhat/linux/7.2/en/os/s390/RedHat/RPMS/, that
seems to omit some RPMs such as the one for the Postfix MTA. One thing I have noticed
is that when I have to go outside this safe haven
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:13:16PM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
[Postfix dependency problems]
Try rebuilding the RPM from the SRPM; that should do it, because I doubt
that Postfix really cares much what glibc is under it.
so: rpm --rebuild postfix.whatever.src.rpm
And then you say
I installed Postfix, but when i run it, i get error:
postfix/smtp[808]: fatal: unknown service: smtp/tcp
I know, that is problem with "chroot jail", but a didn't do any changes
after install and i don't know what i should fix.
Any suggestions?
btw, how can i disable
36 matches
Mail list logo
