Evans, Kevin R wrote:
Currently we're using RHEL4 on z and Fedora Core for desktops. We keep
running into a wall with Java and different products using different
versions of Java. Between the GNU Java compiler, IBM's Java for Eclipse
with MQ Series to Sun Java for AJAX. We're swimming in too
On 9/20/06, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ATI and nVidia video drivers have a certain reputation: I don't use
them, but it seems not all users of either are entirely happy.
I trust you did notice he was asking about Linux on z/VM... And even
on Intel platform I would hope the
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On 9/20/06, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ATI and nVidia video drivers have a certain reputation: I don't use
them, but it seems not all users of either are entirely happy.
I trust you did notice he was asking about Linux on z/VM... And even
on Intel
On Wednesday, 09/20/2006 at 02:18 ZE2, Rob van der Heij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having a single OSA portname in the device that must be
presented by the Linux device driver is a pretty dumb idea when you
want to virtualize things.
Right. So why specify the OSA portname? We got rid of that
One of the developers who is closer to our XML project here than me
(which will run under zLinux and eventually zVM) has been having some
issues with RHEL and has asked me to bounce a couple of questions of you
more knowledgeable folks.
Here goes:
Currently we're using RHEL4 on z and Fedora
On 9/19/06, Evans, Kevin R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the need for multiple Java installations exist with all linux
distributions for zSeries (especially SUSE) ?
I fear you're correct. I also found middleware come with their own
version of Java shipped along with the product. And it may
Currently we're using RHEL4 on z and Fedora Core for desktops. We
keep
running into a wall with Java and different products using different
versions of Java. Between the GNU Java compiler, IBM's Java for
Eclipse
with MQ Series to Sun Java for AJAX. We're swimming in too many
version
of Java
