file created belongs to a single unix
user. Then any other user of the share also has access.
Aria
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of van
Sleeuwen, Berry
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:48 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Sam
erry"
To:
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
05/05/2011 09:20 AM
Subject:
Re: Samba authorization
Sent by:
Linux on 390 Port
The s-bit indeed now let samba force to the group zlinux. But regardless
of umask 022 or 002 in the /etc/profile we still have 744 on the files in
the PL_LINUX directory. E
nal Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Michael MacIsaac
> Sent: woensdag 4 mei 2011 16:20
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Samba authorization
>
> Did you try setting the g+ws bit on the directory and set umask to 002
Did you try setting the g+ws bit on the directory and set umask to 002?
Here's an example:
# cd /
# mkdir samba
# chmod g+ws samba
# chgrp users samba
# vi /etc/profile
... // set umask to 002
# grep umask /etc/profile
# The global umask value is stored in /etc/login.defs and
# will be set by
variables here to troubleshoot.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of van
Sleeuwen, Berry
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:48 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Samba authorization
We have tried several of the recommendations but
We have tried several of the recommendations but still the files are created as
group users and only the owner has read/write on the files. Is there
anything else we can do?
Currently we have in the /etc/smb.conf:
[MFPL]
create mask = 0755
valid users = @users
path = /s
>>> On 4/27/2011 at 08:52 AM, "van Sleeuwen, Berry"
wrote:
> Hi Listers,
>
> On SLES10 SP2 we are running a samba. We would like to have shares for
> specific groups. For instance we have a group zlinux that would get access
> into the "PL Linux" directory and they must be able to read and wri
>>> On 4/27/2011 at 11:13 AM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> What I would really like to do, is if a Windows user tries to access a Samba
> share, and the username and the share name, match, you are good to go. If
> the Windows user doesn't match the share, reject.
>
> Right now, I can do this, if I
Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:13 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Samba Authorization another question
Of all my samba servers, this is the first attempt at being something that end
us
sure.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:13 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Samba Authorization another question
Of all my samba servers, this is the first attempt at being somet
on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Dean, David (I/S)
> Sent: woensdag 27 april 2011 16:14
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Samba authorization
>
> And take the space out of the directory name.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Li
: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Samba authorization
I would think that you would just escape character the space.
path= /srv/smb/shares/MFPL/PL\ Linux
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Tom Duerbusch
wrote:
> So far, all the responses are about the SMB.CONF file.
>
&g
Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Richard Gasiorowski
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:59 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Samba authorization
>
> Most likely the parent directory is 740
>
> Richa
Of all my samba servers, this is the first attempt at being something that end
users would directly interface with, just like they do with our Novell file
servers.
I've tried to force myself to use SWAT, but until I get everything working from
the command line, SWAT is just going to have to wai
.
And you may have to do a chuser to specify a common userid (but I'm not clear
on that one).
I have another samba authorization question, that I will bring up in another
thread.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
>>> "Dean, David (I/S)" 4/27/2011 9:13 AM >>>
And take th
0 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Dean, David (I/S)
> Sent: woensdag 27 april 2011 16:14
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Samba authorization
>
> And take the space out of the directory name.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Li
And take the space out of the directory name.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard
Gasiorowski
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:59 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Samba authorization
Most likely the parent
:
"van Sleeuwen, Berry"
To:
LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date:
04/27/2011 08:55 AM
Subject:
Samba authorization
Hi Listers,
On SLES10 SP2 we are running a samba. We would like to have shares for
specific groups. For instance we have a group zlinux that would get access
into the "PL L
Hi Listers,
On SLES10 SP2 we are running a samba. We would like to have shares for specific
groups. For instance we have a group zlinux that would get access into the "PL
Linux" directory and they must be able to read and write into this directory.
Several resources on the net give us the confi
19 matches
Mail list logo
