On 6/29/06, Doug Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to know if anyone has run lmbench on zSeries?
It looks to be platform agnostic using no platform specific code and is
compiled with the native GCC compiler on the platform being tested.
I do believe the kernel team in Boeblingen
MAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU> Subject
Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
06/22/2006 02:43
AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IS
Subject
Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
06/22/2006 02:43
AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>
On 6/22/06, John Summerfield &l
On 6/22/06, Lawrence R Schiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the last site I worked, we took our largest Oracle application and moved
it to a Linux quest running SLES7. We installed Oracle-9i, it had just
come out. The developers, users reported better response time and reports
ran faster than
At the last site I worked, we took our largest Oracle application and moved
it to a Linux quest running SLES7. We installed Oracle-9i, it had just
come out. The developers, users reported better response time and reports
ran faster than on a SUN-280R. Performance was even better than the old
39 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/22/06, Frank Schwede, LSY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My 2 cents:
>
> Take 3-4 IFLs and put this Oracle on it. Enough for 98% of the coming
> load I think...
> Take 2-3 OpteronBoxes for the Java in fron
Hmm - might be a fair fight then...
What is the disk subsystem on the current AIX box like?
How many / what kind of channels to what storage box for the Z?
If youre still using ESCON to RAMAC... well...
--
Jay Brenneman
--
Fo
userscreens and this for a couple of projects...
Regards
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob van der Heij
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 08:44
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/22/06, John Summerfi
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob van der Heij
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 08:44
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/22/06, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd rather see a
On 6/22/06, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd rather see a benchmark involving Oracle on the Z and the Java app on
the {pSeries,iSeries,Sun} and if you can find a decent Opteron box, that
too.
That would make sense.
And if it has to be all on zSeries, we learned that it does help
on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yu
Safin
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:29 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SuSE Linux Benchmark
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benc
: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:50 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/21/06, Fargusson.Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Absolutely not. A z890 is slower than a 1.2GHz Power CPU. Two IFLs compared
to 6 Power CPUs is going to be a lot slower. SPARC chi
On 6/21/06, Yu Safin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am talking throughput here, not speed.
What would be the difference if your test fully saturates the 6 CPU's
? That would suggest the test is limited by the processing capacity
right now. Less and/or slower CPUs will make it slower. If that's
:50 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/21/06, Fargusson.Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely not. A z890 is slower than a 1.2GHz Power CPU. Two IFLs compared
> to 6 Power CPUs is going to be a lot slower. SPARC chips are generally
> fas
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yu
Safin
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:29 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SuSE Linux Benchmark
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benchnmark with
21, 2006 1:29 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SuSE Linux Benchmark
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benchnmark with a few concurrent jobs and the 6 Unix CPU's were
pegged at 100% f
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benchnmark with a few concurrent jobs and the 6 Unix CPU's were
pegged at 100% for 10+ hours (1.2 GHz CPU's) under AIX.
We also have Linux SuSE under zVM with Ora
17 matches
Mail list logo
