Ranga Nathan wrote:
Subject
Re: Using SAMBA / NFS for data interchange between Windows and Linux - any
reservations?
Sorry, not answering your question ... but appending my own to it ...
We do lots of ftps as well and using NFS/SAMBA sounds like an
interesting alternative. However, we
On Thursday, 11/17/2005 at 03:34 EST, David Kreuter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from an architecture perspective is ftp doing the same thing as
nfs/samba? FTP
is more of a come and get it - samba/nfs are here when you want it. Just
a
thought.
Not the same. FTP is a file *transfer* method. NFS
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:03:55PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote:
easily automated file transfer from z/OS to Windows. NJE is a lot easier
to
use than the SMB or NFS clients in that file transfer becomes the problem
of
coding a DEST=(node, user) on your DD card.
I like that abstraction. Is
I am proposing an architecture that will do away with myriad FTPs within
our network and replace it with a simple LAN based file sharing using
SAMBA / NFS / NAS.
The FTPs have been a little flaky and processes did not always check
success / failure of FTP. I am hoping that LAN based file sharing
What I am not sure if how SAMBA / NFS perform under heavy
load? Are there any gotchas?
R/O sharing with only one writer shouldn't be a problem. R/W sharing will
take some planning, in that file locking is done differently in Samba and
NFS, and consistency may not be maintained to all the
Sorry, not answering your question ... but appending my own to it ...
We do lots of ftps as well and using NFS/SAMBA sounds like an
interesting alternative. However, we just went through an audit and one
of the requirements that came out of that is that all transfers have to
be encrypted. So
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Using SAMBA / NFS for data interchange between Windows and Linux - any
reservations?
I am proposing an architecture that will do away with myriad FTPs within
our network and replace it with a simple LAN based file sharing using
SAMBA / NFS / NAS.
The FTPs have been a little flaky
of Ranga Nathan
Sent: Thu 11/17/2005 1:33 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Using SAMBA / NFS for data interchange between Windows and Linux -
any reservations?
I am proposing an architecture that will do away with myriad FTPs within
our network and replace it with a simple LAN based file
We do lots of ftps as well and using NFS/SAMBA sounds like an
interesting alternative. However, we just went through an
audit and one of the requirements that came out of that is
that all transfers have to be encrypted. So we're using ftp
with TLS/SSL encryption. Does SAMBA/NFS encrypt
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Using SAMBA / NFS for data interchange between Windows and Linux - any
reservations?
from an architecture perspective is ftp doing the same thing as nfs/samba?
FTP is more of a come and get
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Using SAMBA / NFS for data interchange between Windows and Linux - any
reservations?
Sorry, not answering your question ... but appending my own to it ...
We do lots of ftps as well and using
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Using SAMBA / NFS for data interchange between Windows and Linux - any
reservations?
What I am not sure if how SAMBA / NFS perform under heavy
load? Are there any gotchas?
R/O sharing
12 matches
Mail list logo
