Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-21 Thread Post, Mark K
for these kinds of companies. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Summerfied Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 6:16 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux Post, Mark K wrote: How many of those

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-19 Thread John Summerfied
: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:33 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux This came as a surprise to me: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/16/microsoft_takes_stick_to_novell/ ... found the Linux system required an eye-watering 187 patches while Windows

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-19 Thread John Summerfied
and was probably reading theregister.co.uk when the copy finished:-) -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Post, Mark K Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 8:37 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-18 Thread ADAMS Steven
PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux How many of those patches were against packages that would not be in a base Windows install? I didn't see any URL to the actual report, so I can't answer that myself. How many of the patches against Linux required

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-17 Thread Carsten Otte
John Summerfied wrote: Comments? First they ignore you, then they laugh about you, then they fight you, and then you win. (Nelson Mandela) -- Carsten Otte IBM Linux technology center ARCH=s390 -- For LINUX-390 subscribe /

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-17 Thread Kielek, Samuel
@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux John Summerfied wrote: Comments? First they ignore you, then they laugh about you, then they fight you, and then you win. (Nelson Mandela) -- Carsten Otte IBM Linux technology center ARCH=s390

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-17 Thread Carsten Otte
Kielek, Samuel wrote: I'm pretty sure that was Gandhi who came up with that statement... Although, I would not be surprised if Mandela quoted Gandhi. Mea maximum culpa. It was Gandhi indeed. -- Carsten Otte IBM Linux technology center ARCH=s390

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-17 Thread Post, Mark K
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Summerfied Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:33 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux This came as a surprise to me: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/16/microsoft_takes_stick_to_novell/ ... found the Linux system required

Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-16 Thread John Summerfied
This came as a surprise to me: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/16/microsoft_takes_stick_to_novell/ ... found the Linux system required an eye-watering 187 patches while Windows needed just 37. ... Novell system suffered 14 critical breakages while the Windows system suffered none.

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-16 Thread ADAMS Steven
Subject: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux This came as a surprise to me: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/16/microsoft_takes_stick_to_novell/ ... found the Linux system required an eye-watering 187 patches while Windows needed just 37. ... Novell system suffered 14 critical breakages

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-16 Thread Ray Mullins
, Ray -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ADAMS Steven Sent: Wednesday November 16 2005 14:52 To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux The first sentence says it all Microsoft-funded research. I

Re: Windows Server thrashes Novell's Linux

2005-11-16 Thread John Summerfied
Ray Mullins wrote: Also, Microsoft has the tendency to roll multiple fixes into one patch, while Linux patches are distributed individually. This was also discussed earlier when a MS-leaning organization noted that Firefox had more fixes than IE in the 3rd quarter of this year - but if you