or curses.
Florian Bilek florian.bi...@gmail.com
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
24/03/2009 14:00
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Windows an linux under z/VM
/2009 14:00
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Windows an linux under z/VM
The trick does QEMU (http://www.nongnu.org/qemu/). All other
virtualisation
options that are currently available do not provide you with X86
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Summerfield wrote:
This isn't really the place to discuss these diffulties, it's sufficient
to say that virtualisation on Linux isn't ready yet. Not with XEN, not
work KVM and not using the vir* tools.
Mhh ... I'd say this depends to extent
On 3/23/09 11:46 PM, Shane Ginnane sginn...@isi.com.au wrote:
Interesting, but requires Xen or KVM to work in current form, and relies
on
being able to just pass through instructions to the base hardware for
things
that don't require privileged ops.
I don't see that as an intrinsic
On 3/23/2009 at 11:46 PM, Shane Ginnane sginn...@isi.com.au wrote:
-snip-
No doubt Mark is correct re the usability of the z KVM at present, but one
would imagine that has to improve.
I wasn't speaking about KVM on any particular architecture. It's a nightmare
for everyone. If Xen is any
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:31:39 -0600
Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/23/2009 at 11:46 PM, Shane Ginnane sginn...@isi.com.au wrote:
-snip-
No doubt Mark is correct re the usability of the z KVM at present, but one
would imagine that has to improve.
I wasn't speaking about KVM on any
Hugo,
The trick does QEMU (http://www.nongnu.org/qemu/). All other virtualisation
options that are currently available do not provide you with X86
architecture on z/Series.
I tried Windows 2003 Server to install and this was working. Depending on
which z/Series machine you have, the emulation is
Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:31:39 -0600
Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/23/2009 at 11:46 PM, Shane Ginnane sginn...@isi.com.au wrote:
-snip-
No doubt Mark is correct re the usability of the z KVM at present, but one
would imagine that has to improve.
I wasn't speaking
Hi guys .. I'm going to ask a question half crazy but I want to know if
you can virtualize Windows on a Linux on z / VM and if any place any
evidence of this.
Thanks
Hugo Luis Vitelli
Mainframe Server Management
System Support - Solutions
: (+44) (0)1962-817072
From:
Hugo Luis Vitelli vitel...@ar.ibm.com
To:
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
23/03/2009 19:16
Subject:
Windows an linux under z/VM
Hi guys .. I'm going to ask a question half crazy but I want to know if
you can virtualize Windows on a Linux on z / VM and if any place any
Certified IT Specialist
IBM z/VM CP Development
MOBEX: 37264807; Mobile (+44) (0)7739-875237
Office: (+44) (0)1962-817072
From:
Hugo Luis Vitelli vitel...@ar.ibm.com
To:
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
23/03/2009 19:16
Subject:
Windows an linux under z/VM
Hi guys .. I'm going to ask
Check out the IBM-Main list concerning the Mantissa announcement.
--- e...@uptownmilitia.com wrote:
From: Erik N Johnson e...@uptownmilitia.com
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Windows an linux under z/VM
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:10:27 -0500
Could Xen run on z/Linux? I don't see why
, CITP
Senior Certified IT Specialist
IBM z/VM CP Development
MOBEX: 37264807; Mobile (+44) (0)7739-875237
Office: (+44) (0)1962-817072
From:
Hugo Luis Vitelli vitel...@ar.ibm.com
To:
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
23/03/2009 19:16
Subject:
Windows an linux under z/VM
Hi guys .. I'm
On 3/23/09 3:59 PM, Richard J Moore richardj_mo...@uk.ibm.com wrote:
1) there's a Z port of WIndows, which I doubt
There was one in the NT 3.51 days. IBM and Microsoft couldn't agree on some
things so it was never released. Talk to Jim Porell about it. He's good for
at least an hour rant on
What was presented at SHARE.
9162 - x86 Virtualization Technology for System z
http://ew.share.org/proceedingmod/abstract.cfm?abstract_id=19229
-Original Message-
Richard Pinion
Check out the IBM-Main list concerning the Mantissa announcement.
Hugo Luis Vitelli
Hi guys .. I'm
On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Richard J Moore wrote:
Not a chance unless:
1) there's a Z port of WIndows, which I doubt
2) there's an Intel emulator that runs under Z. Not heard of one.
Richard
Bah.
#2 is old news.
http://www.fsf.net/~adam/NT-on-390-desktop.png
Back in 2002.
You *can*
) (0)7739-875237 Office: (+44)
(0)1962-817072
From: Hugo Luis Vitelli vitel...@ar.ibm.com To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Date:
23/03/2009 19:16 Subject: Windows an linux under z/VM
Hi guys .. I'm going to ask a question half crazy but I want to know if you can
virtualize Windows on a Linux on z
Huegel, Thomas wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu]on Behalf Of
Erik N Johnson
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:10 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Windows an linux under z/VM
Could Xen run on z/Linux? I don't see why
Hi guys .. I'm going to ask a question half crazy but I want to know if
you can virtualize Windows on a Linux on z / VM and if any place any
evidence of this.
If you want virtualization under *zLinux*, that appears to count out the
(so far) vapourware from Mantissa.
A few months back Redhat
On 3/23/2009 at 4:10 PM, Erik N Johnson e...@uptownmilitia.com wrote:
Could Xen run on z/Linux? I don't see why not.
Not in it's current state. It started out too Intel/AMD focused. Now that
Power development is ongoing, that's changed somewhat, but nothing has been
done to make it work
On 3/23/09 8:12 PM, Shane Ginnane sginn...@isi.com.au wrote:
A few months back Redhat bought Qumranet - that gave them access to the
Solid ICE product. No reason I can imagine it couldn't run (suitably
adapted) on zLinux.
See http://www.redhat.com/rhel/virtualization/Solid_ICE/
Interesting,
Interesting, but requires Xen or KVM to work in current form, and relies
on
being able to just pass through instructions to the base hardware for
things
that don't require privileged ops.
I don't see that as an intrinsic problem.
Remove z/VM from the equation and ... ?
No doubt Mark is
22 matches
Mail list logo