Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-20 Thread Wayne Driscoll
: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR On Thursday, 06/19/2008 at 03:42 EDT, Stephen Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently no. But it is coming. Soon? You need a z10 and z/VM later than 5.4 (z/VM 6.0 maybe). A z/VM LPAR is a Statement of Direction in the z10 announcement from back in February

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-20 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 06/20/2008 at 11:28 EDT, Wayne Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan, My guess is that since this currently isn't available in z/VM 5.3, Steve was using 5.4 or 6.0 instead of stating a future version of z/VM. I know IBM is loath to announce product versions until at the earliest

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-20 Thread Huegel, Thomas
How about a new name? ez/VM 1.1 ? -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 11:18 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR On Friday, 06/20/2008 at 11:28 EDT, Wayne Driscoll

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Post
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about a new name? ez/VM 1.1 ? Oh, $DIETY, don't encourage them. IBM's branding folks can't keep their hands off products names as it is. Mark Post

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Pace
Amen! On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about a new name? ez/VM 1.1 ? Oh, $DIETY, don't encourage them. IBM's branding folks can't keep their

mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-19 Thread Little, Chris
possible? or no? +--+ | Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services | | IS Operating Systems Specialist IV | | email [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | work (405)522-1306 cell (405)312-1527 |

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-19 Thread Mark Pace
No on z9 and previous. z10, I'm not sure. On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Little, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: possible? or no? +--+ | Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services | | IS Operating Systems Specialist IV |

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-19 Thread Rich Smrcina
Currently, no. Little, Chris wrote: possible? or no? +--+ | Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services | | IS Operating Systems Specialist IV | | email [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | work (405)522-1306 cell

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-19 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Little, Chris Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 1:17 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR possible

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-19 Thread Feller, Paul
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR possible? or no? +--+ | Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services | | IS Operating Systems Specialist IV | | email [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | work

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-19 Thread Mark Post
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:29 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Feller, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the announcement information for the z10. Increased flexibility with z/VM-mode partitions System z10 EC provides for the definition of a z/VM-mode partition (LPAR) containing a mix

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-19 Thread Stephen Frazier
Currently no. But it is coming. Soon? You need a z10 and z/VM later than 5.4 (z/VM 6.0 maybe). Little, Chris wrote: possible? or no? +--+ | Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services | | IS Operating Systems Specialist IV | |

Re: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR

2008-06-19 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 06/19/2008 at 03:42 EDT, Stephen Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently no. But it is coming. Soon? You need a z10 and z/VM later than 5.4 (z/VM 6.0 maybe). A z/VM LPAR is a Statement of Direction in the z10 announcement from back in February. No dates were given and nothing