Re: mksles9oot (again)

2005-10-12 Thread Martin Peschke3
NUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU | | cc: | | Subjec

Re: mksles9oot (again)

2005-10-12 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Yep, the md5sub values are the same. I updated the iso names in my copy of mksles9root and tried it out. No errors. So, it looks like I'm good to go. Thanks for the conformation. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/05 10:21 AM >>> Tom, Yes, you can just rename the files

Re: mksles9oot (again)

2005-10-12 Thread Michael MacIsaac
Tom, Yes, you can just rename the files so mksles9root is happy. I'm not really sure of the differences. We get our ISO images from a common FTP server within IBM. Here are the details of mine: # ls -l *SP-2* -rw--- 1 root root 612798464 Jul 25 09:15 SLES-9-SP-2-s390x-GM-CD1.iso -rw---

mksles9oot (again)

2005-10-12 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Dumb quick question. I'm trying to add SP2 to my 64 bit install process. In mksles9root, the service packs are listed as: SLES-9-SP-2-s390x-GM-CD1.iso SLES-9-SP-2-s390x-GM-CD2.iso SLES-9-SP-2-s390x-GM-CD3.iso However, as just downloaded from Novell/Suse...where ever, the images are: SLES-9-SP-