Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-24 Thread Yu Safin
: I can't get NED to work on 2.6. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/15/2006 11:36 AM -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Stewart Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:19 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: protocol converter? Isn't

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-24 Thread Post, Mark K
] On Behalf Of Yu Safin Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 3:32 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: protocol converter? -snip- On a simpler note, how about a ctrl-c so I can break out of commands such as ping while connected via my zVM 3270 emulation connection to my Linux guest? can

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread John Summerfield
be used in the manner. Now, back in the deep, dark past, I remember a product that we had on VM/370 (yes, that long ago!). This was a software protocol converter which allowed a start-stop or async terminal, such as a VT-100, to logon to a service machine (via NCP/NTO). This service machine would

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Randy Evans
by Esker. The SNA requirement on VM required VTAM, which required GCS, which is probably more than you bargained for. And, the remote connection to the ASCII application, if you will, used TCP/IP mostly, but could also connect through a 3708 protocol converter plus a few other connectivity options. So

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Lee Stewart
be used in the manner. Now, back in the deep, dark past, I remember a product that we had on VM/370 (yes, that long ago!). This was a software protocol converter which allowed a start-stop or async terminal, such as a VT-100, to logon to a service machine (via NCP/NTO). This service machine would then use

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Stewart Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:19 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: protocol converter? Isn't the better/full answer to get IBM to support the Integrated ASCII Console

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Richard Pinion
I can't get NED to work on 2.6. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/15/2006 11:36 AM -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Stewart Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:19 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: protocol converter? Isn't

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Peter 1 Oberparleiter
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15.08.2006 17:36:48: From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Stewart Isn't the better/full answer to get IBM to support the Integrated ASCII Console on the HMC? Lee Well, that assumes you have physical access to the

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Dave Jones
, August 15, 2006 10:19 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: protocol converter? Isn't the better/full answer to get IBM to support the Integrated ASCII Console on the HMC? Lee Well, that assumes you have physical access to the HMC. But, yes, I would like that. Or have z/VM emulate

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Richard Pinion
: I can't get NED to work on 2.6. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/15/2006 11:36 AM -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Stewart Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:19 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: protocol converter? Isn't the better/full

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Dave Jones
, August 15, 2006 10:19 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: protocol converter? Isn't the better/full answer to get IBM to support the Integrated ASCII Console on the HMC? Lee Well, that assumes you have physical access to the HMC. But, yes, I would like that. Or have z/VM emulate

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Lee Stewart
I should have added... under VM... Since most of us don't run with bare LPARs... Lee Peter 1 Oberparleiter wrote: McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15.08.2006 17:36:48: From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Stewart Isn't the better/full answer to get IBM

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 08/15/2006 at 05:48 ZE2, Peter 1 Oberparleiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI Linux support for the Integrated Ascii Console has been present for some time under the title VT220-like full-screen mode terminal. Which does not help a Linux guest as there is currently no way to give a

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-15 Thread Richard Hitt
/15/2006 11:36 AM -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Stewart Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:19 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: protocol converter? Isn't the better/full answer to get IBM to support the Integrated ASCII

protocol converter?

2006-08-14 Thread McKown, John
!). This was a software protocol converter which allowed a start-stop or async terminal, such as a VT-100, to logon to a service machine (via NCP/NTO). This service machine would then use VM's LDC (?) to create a 3270 session and it would convert the 3270 control sequences to VT-100 control sequences

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-14 Thread Richard Troth
. Now, back in the deep, dark past, I remember a product that we had on VM/370 (yes, that long ago!). This was a software protocol converter which allowed a start-stop or async terminal, such as a VT-100, to logon to a service machine (via NCP/NTO). This service machine would then use VM's LDC

Re: protocol converter?

2006-08-14 Thread David Boyes
: protocol converter? I've read a lot here about people wanting to use vi or some other application which is full screen from the Linux console. The reply is always that the Linux console cannot be used in the manner. Now, back in the deep, dark past, I remember a product that we had on VM/370