I'm new to this list and am wondering if the message below means to
imply that an 8086 system with expanded memory is not supported
because drivers for all the different bank-switching schemes do not
exist. I have the same question for 80286 systems with extended
memory cards.
Expanded memory
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Eric J. Korpela wrote:
[snip]
I don't suppose you ever used X on an 8 MHz 68010 (like early Sun machines).
I have :-)
I wonder if it's still possible to get X10 or X11R3 source code anywhere.
X wasn't always as bloated as it is now.
[snip]
ftp.x.org
andru
What happened to the mailing list archives?
If I could search the archives, I could probably find the answer to
my next question:
Is there a terminal emulator program for ELKS yet?
For those keeping count, I've got ELKS running on a Compaq 286
'lunchbox' machine (1.5megs, 40 meg HD), and
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Chris Starling wrote:
What happened to the mailing list archives?
if they indeed did disappear I'd volunteer to make them available on my
server if somebody happens to have them.
Tracy Camp 503.380.3218
Hurrah
I thought I remembered someone making a small simple terminal
program...maybe it was just for testing serial support. I probably have
the mail sitting around somewhere, but it'd take forever to find it. Am I
remembering right??
Dan
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Chris Starling wrote:
What
Hello
I think that´s impossible, but why not increase the amount of memory?
You run into the same problem as you do trying to use Expanded memory on a
pc, each company used they're own bank switching scheme, and the CPU can
only address 64k otherwise.
Well, most of the Z80 systems have only
At 08:33 15/04/99 +0200, Zak wrote:
snip
documentation, and no other will work. (There´s an article about memory
expansion on Z80 in http://www.psyber.com/~tcj/tcjol.html - dram.zip, but I
haven´t try´d it yet)
This link is okay but the two articles both abort with 404 errors. Anyone
know
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Dan Olson wrote:
I thought I remembered someone making a small simple terminal
program...maybe it was just for testing serial support. I probably have
the mail sitting around somewhere, but it'd take forever to find it. Am I
remembering right??
check
include the To: field of the mail header.
Geez, duh. I should've thought of that. Sorry everyone!
Ross
