On 16 Sep 99, at 13:45, Louis P. Santillan wrote:
> I thought the Z80s were near 8088s or 188s...am I on Dr Pepper again???
Maybe he's thinking of the NEC V20 & V30?
Unless I'm also horribly mistaken, they were souped up clones of
the 8088.
-chris
>I thought the Z80s were near 8088s or 188s...am I on Dr Pepper again???
No, they are more like 8080s. 8088s are 16 bit machines, whereas the
Z80 remains an 8 bit machine.
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Greg Haerr wrote:
> On Thursday, September 16, 1999 2:45 PM, Louis P. Santillan
>[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> : I thought the Z80s were near 8088s or 188s...am I on Dr Pepper again???
> :
> You've been drinking *way* too much Dr Pepper.
>
> <8bitprocessors>
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Greg Haerr wrote:
> On Thursday, September 16, 1999 2:45 PM, Louis P. Santillan
>[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> : I thought the Z80s were near 8088s or 188s...am I on Dr Pepper again???
> :
> You've been drinking *way* too much Dr Pepper.
>
> <8bitprocessors>
On Thursday, September 16, 1999 2:45 PM, Louis P. Santillan
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
: I thought the Z80s were near 8088s or 188s...am I on Dr Pepper again???
:
You've been drinking *way* too much Dr Pepper.
<8bitprocessors>: 8080 -> 8085 -> z80
<16bitprocessors>:
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Louis P. Santillan wrote:
> I thought the Z80s were near 8088s or 188s...am I on Dr Pepper again???
Yes :)
The Z80 is basically a souped-up 8080-clone.
The 8088, on the other hand, is an incompatible successor to the 8080.
Only the later has an active ELKS or Linux port t
Oops...Z80 can deal with 8080A binaries...
--
"It's not about the money...It's about the rules. Without rules,
we might as well be tree climbers flinging crap at each other."
- Red Foreman of That '70s S
I thought the Z80s were near 8088s or 188s...am I on Dr Pepper again???
--
"It's not about the money...It's about the rules. Without rules,
we might as well be tree climbers flinging crap at each other."
The 89 has even more(about 512), but it's divided between "unarchived" and
"archived" memory. I haven't looked up the specs on how this works...
---Matt
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Louis P. Santillan wrote:
> BTW, what kind of machine was used for the first Palm Pilot Port? Wasn't
> i
BTW, what kind of machine was used for the first Palm Pilot Port? Wasn't
it a 256K machine? The 83+ are 128K machines and I think 92+ are 256K
machines? Hmmm...I should look it up.
--
"It's not about the money...It's about the rul
Actually the Flash upgradeable RAM is in the 83+(Z80), and the 89 and the
92+(maybe the 92 also) which both(all) run m68k processors.
---Matt
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Alistair Riddoch wrote:
> Louis P. Santillan writes:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Any word on someone try
Patrice Kadionik writes:
>
> Hi all,
> I intend to reuse very old pcs under linux and discovered ELKS :-)
>
> I'm looking for a howto on ELKS installation more detailled than the FAQ on the
> ELKS site ? Has anybody pointers on it (tutorial, howto, manual...) ?
>
I am afraid there is no more d
Louis P. Santillan writes:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Any word on someone trying to port ELKS to the new "upgradable" TI's, like
> the 83 and 85/86 (not sure which)? That would be cool. They are called
> the plus series I believe.
>
>From TIs web site it looks as though these machines have Z80
Hello everyone,
Any word on someone trying to port ELKS to the new "upgradable" TI's, like
the 83 and 85/86 (not sure which)? That would be cool. They are called
the plus series I believe.
Louis
--
"It's not about the money...It'
Hi all,
I intend to reuse very old pcs under linux and discovered ELKS :-)
I'm looking for a howto on ELKS installation more detailled than the FAQ on the
ELKS site ? Has anybody pointers on it (tutorial, howto, manual...) ?
Thank your for your help.
--
Patrice Kadionik. F6KQH / F4CUQ
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
