The 89 has even more(about 512), but it's divided between "unarchived" and
"archived" memory. I haven't looked up the specs on how this works...
---Matt
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Louis P. Santillan wrote:
> BTW, what kind of machine was used for the first Palm Pilot Port? Wasn't
> it a 256K machine? The 83+ are 128K machines and I think 92+ are 256K
> machines? Hmmm...I should look it up.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> "It's not about the money...It's about the rules. Without rules,
> we might as well be tree climbers flinging crap at each other."
> - Red Foreman of That '70s Show
>
> On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, mundy matthew wrote:
>
> > Actually the Flash upgradeable RAM is in the 83+(Z80), and the 89 and the
> > 92+(maybe the 92 also) which both(all) run m68k processors.
> > ---Matt
> > On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Alistair Riddoch wrote:
> >
> > > Louis P. Santillan writes:
> > > >
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Any word on someone trying to port ELKS to the new "upgradable" TI's, like
> > > > the 83 and 85/86 (not sure which)? That would be cool. They are called
> > > > the plus series I believe.
> > > >
> > >
> > > >From TIs web site it looks as though these machines have Z80 processors,
> > > and as far as I know there is no Z80 port of Linux yet. In any case it us
> > > unlikely that any unix like system will run on a machine with this little
> > > RAM and no storage.
> > >
> > > Al
> > >
> >
> >
>
