The 89 has even more(about 512), but it's divided between "unarchived" and
"archived" memory.  I haven't looked up the specs on how this works...
                ---Matt

On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Louis P. Santillan wrote:

> BTW, what kind of machine was used for the first Palm Pilot Port?  Wasn't
> it a 256K machine?  The 83+ are 128K machines and I think 92+ are 256K
> machines?  Hmmm...I should look it up.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> "It's not about the money...It's about the rules.  Without rules,
>    we might as well be tree climbers flinging crap at each other."
>                           - Red Foreman of That '70s Show
> 
> On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, mundy matthew wrote:
> 
> > Actually the Flash upgradeable RAM is in the 83+(Z80), and the 89 and the
> > 92+(maybe the 92 also) which both(all) run m68k processors.
> >                     ---Matt
> > On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Alistair Riddoch wrote:
> > 
> > > Louis P. Santillan writes:
> > > > 
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > 
> > > > Any word on someone trying to port ELKS to the new "upgradable" TI's, like
> > > > the 83 and 85/86 (not sure which)?  That would be cool.  They are called
> > > > the plus series I believe.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > >From TIs web site it looks as though these machines have Z80 processors,
> > > and as far as I know there is no Z80 port of Linux yet. In any case it us
> > > unlikely that any unix like system will run on a machine with this little
> > > RAM and no storage.
> > > 
> > > Al
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to