Re: X-Server

2000-01-17 Thread Eric J. Korpela
I recall mention of DesqViewX allowing an X-server for a 286, but I can't say I've ever seen it. There are also versions of PC-Xview that run on 286. One under Windows 3.1 in standard mode, and one that runs under DOS. I seem to remember seeing several copies of each a Weird Stuff Warehouse

Re: Implementing vfork

1999-07-27 Thread Eric J. Korpela
: The parent process's data segment is not copied, just re-alloced, and : rather than returning to the parrent process, fork sleeps on the parents : child_wait wait queue. Let me try to remind myself of the vfork semantics Basically, rather than copying the data segment on

Re: lcc for the 8086

1999-06-08 Thread Eric J. Korpela
Someone was doing a port of lcc to the 8086/8, weren't they? Could whoever it was get in touch with me? I'm looking for something similar and was wondering if I could have a look at the .md file. That's me. Haven't touched it in years. You can get the .md files at my web site... There

Re: lcc for the 8086

1999-06-08 Thread Eric J. Korpela
Is lcc-win32 currently generating only 80386 code? Yes I looked at all the source some time ago but don't remember. Also, which distribution are you looking at as the master? lcc 4.0 Eric

Re: lcc for the 8086

1999-06-08 Thread Eric J. Korpela
Also, what object and executable file formats are currently supported? LCC doesn't support any object and executable file formats. LCC only supports assemby output formats. LCC-8086 currently has only a NASM output. NASM supports multiple object file formats.

Re: lcc for the 8086

1999-06-08 Thread Eric J. Korpela
My version of lcc-win32 doesn't require an assembler, and outputs PE format (modified COFF) executables. lcc-win32 != LCC lcc-win32 == LCC + assembler + linker + editor + other stuff LCC ends here ^ As far as I know, the authors of LCC don't consider lcc-win32 to be an LCC distribution,

Re: NanoX version 0.3 released

1999-05-15 Thread Eric J. Korpela
Well - for the first version, there's nothing from preventing a program from issuing the int10 without making the ioctl(). At some point on an 8086 we have to trust programmers not to break the rules. Without some sort of device driver lock for video, even if it's an unenforceable

Re: NanoX version 0.3 released

1999-05-11 Thread Eric J. Korpela
o MSDOS driver support. I wrote a 640x480x16 color driver in about 45 minutes. NanoX now runs on DOS! (OK, I did this only to see how portable nanoX is, and the mouse driver still isn't written) This still uses MSC graphics library. I'll have the bios int10 version driver done

Re: some questions [OT]

1999-05-10 Thread Eric J. Korpela
There was a Z80 add-on chip that could be purchased for a C64 or a C128. I think few people used it, tho... :-) The Z80 wasn't an add-on for the C128, it was there all the time. The C128 shipped with CP/M-Plus. I think using CP/M depended upon having a 1571 drive rather than the 1541.

Re: X?

1999-01-21 Thread Eric J. Korpela
OK I know this sounds really strange, but are there any plans to port X to ELKS? I know it won't run on most machines, but I guess a 286 with 2MB might be able to handle it. After all, win3.1 runs on it... Maybe just a subset of it's features, just enough to make it possible to export apps