RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)

1999-10-06 Thread Thomas Stewart
> > * wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS > > : > > : How much faster is this thing? Useable? > > > > > > It's definitely faster, and it works. I use it for the ELKS port, > > which runs on _slow_ systems. > >The old one was abismal even on my 386. Is the flickering/poor mouse >movement

RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)

1999-10-06 Thread Luke (boo) Farrar
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Greg Haerr wrote: > * wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS > : > : How much faster is this thing? Useable? > > > It's definitely faster, and it works. I use it for the ELKS port, > which runs on _slow_ systems. The old one was abismal even on my 386. Is the

Re: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)

1999-10-06 Thread Thomas Stewart
> > * wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS > >How much faster is this thing? Useable? > It works, it is kind of useble on a 386SX 16Mhz, the optimized hline definately speeds it up. tom __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.ho

RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)

1999-10-05 Thread Greg Haerr
* wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS : : How much faster is this thing? Useable? It's definitely faster, and it works. I use it for the ELKS port, which runs on _slow_ systems. Greg

Re: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)

1999-10-05 Thread Luke (boo) Farrar
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Greg Haerr wrote: > > The major changes in this release are: > > * wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS How much faster is this thing? Useable? Luke(Boo) Farrar.

RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows

1999-10-05 Thread Greg Haerr
: Speaking of projects .. I have few questions regarding 0.84 release of : mwin. : : 1: nano-x won't compile here with -O switch. It has to be some sort of : copt error (it does compile actually but doesn't assemble/link). This : can be solved by calling bcc without -O for nanox/srvfunc.c to be :

RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows

1999-10-04 Thread David Murn
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Greg Haerr wrote: > On Monday, October 04, 1999 1:32 PM, Araujo, Isaque G. >[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > : Would be nice if you had some screenshots of nano-X/microwindows running ! > : > Yes, it would be. Sometime ago this was discussed on this list, > and IIRC,

RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows

1999-10-04 Thread Greg Haerr
On Monday, October 04, 1999 1:32 PM, Araujo, Isaque G. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: : Would be nice if you had some screenshots of nano-X/microwindows running ! : Yes, it would be. Sometime ago this was discussed on this list, and IIRC, all that had to be done was that /dev/fb0 was re

RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows

1999-10-04 Thread Araujo, Isaque G.
Would be nice if you had some screenshots of nano-X/microwindows running ! /H\j HPLX SG70900338[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=U=) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 55-11-3741-3510 '-' C/C++ PL/SQL Sistema Empresa / SIAL 2000 > -Original Message- > From: G

Re: new version of nano-X/microwindows

1999-10-04 Thread Bradley D. LaRonde
Excellent! I will look at it right away. Thanks Greg. Regards, Brad - Original Message - From: Greg Haerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 1:26 PM Subject: new version of nano-X/microwindows > I've completed another ver