On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:50:05 +0800 Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Oliver,
Thanks for your comments,
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 18:45 +0800, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Montag 20 August 2007 schrieb Zhang Rui:
Files name must be unique in the same directory.
Bug is reported here:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:29:18 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8995
Summary: /proc/acpi/alarm worked; update to 2.6.22.2 and
/sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm don't
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:59:50 +0200 Lionel Landwerlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Three weeks, no responses.
I'm using 2.6.22.1 on my macbook (32bits). I had got this trace a few
hours after a suspend to disk. I never got this kind of trace without
suspend. I will try to reproduce with
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
This is presently assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should it
be assigned to acpi instead?
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:27:25 +0200
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 22.08.2007 11:06 schrieb Andrew Morton:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc3/2.6.23-rc3-mm1/
After applying Matthew Wilcox' patch to include/linux/isa.h
which patch
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:47:59 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 25.08.2007 02:07 schrieb Andrew Morton:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:27:25 +0200
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 22.08.2007 11:06 schrieb Andrew Morton:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:33:48 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8919
Summary: Broken hotkeys on ASUS A6Km notebook with 2.6.23-rc3.
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.23-rc3
Platform:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:39:30 +0300 (EEST) Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I noticed that v2.6.23-rc1 locks up during boot, same thing happens now
with the latest linus' tree (+net-2.6.24 and tcp-2.6 tree stuff on top
of it; in -rc1 test they weren't though). The exact location of
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:15:51 +0300 (EEST) Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:46 +0300 (EEST) Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:39:30 +0300
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:24:48 -0400
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
---
kacpid/53 is trying to acquire lock:
(ec-lock){--..}, at: [c03031a7] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:40:40 +0300 (EEST)
Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID ACPI: EC: Handler for query 0x57 is not found!
And similar message on IBM Thinkpad X20:
ACPI: EC: Handler for query 0x2e is not found!
(cc's restored - please don't alter them)
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:05:02 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following error occurs:
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xb2f9): In function `acpi_pci_choose_state':
pci-acpi.c: undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x3269d): In function
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:24:44 -0400
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best time to do this would be late(ish) in the 2.6.24 merge
window.
Can we do it then?
Sure. I never know what the right time is. Would that be after
2.6.23
has come out,
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:27:57 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Run PNP files through Lindent. These patches are all completely
independent and contain no functional changes. Object files before
and after are identical.
These are against current upstream. If you prefer a different base
or
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:39:57 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 23 July 2007 04:08:52 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:27:57 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Run PNP files through Lindent. These patches are all completely
independent and contain
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:53:21 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 23 July 2007 04:49:09 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:39:57 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 23 July 2007 04:08:52 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
eep, this is the worst
It's quite sad that this uses GFP_ATOMIC. Because GFP_ATOMIC is quite
unreliable.
Is it just not possible to use GFP_KERNEL here?
If _any_ of the callers of this function could have used GFP_KERNEL then we
could at least pass the gfp_t into this function to allow it to use the
stronger form
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 13:55:24 +0200 Patrizio Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With linux 2.6.21 and 22 i cannot get cpufreq working anymore while it
worked in previous versions
ACPI Exception (processor_core-0781): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is
not present [20070126]
ACPI Exception
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:40:06 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the future some drivers may need to use ACPI to determine the low power
states in which to place their devices, but to provide the drivers with this
information the
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:47:08 -0400 Ryan Hope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that this message goes away if I reboot my computer... So a
fresh boot it errors, on reboot it does not error.
On 7/10/07, Ryan Hope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 I have been seeing these
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:25:48 -0700 Ravikiran G Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paper over 'select' inadequacies.
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/x86_64/Kconfig
===
use attachments, use text/plain, not application/octet-stream
- Format code to remain within 80 columns.
- Don't do if(. Do if (
Oh well. Good to hear that the oops got fixed, thanks.
From: Luming Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:00:17 +0100 Andy Whitcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Getting this on a bigger x86_64 (bl6-13):
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at RIP:
[8037898b] acpi_processor_throttling_seq_show+0xa7/0xd6
PGD 2d77067 PUD 34c3067 PMD 0
initcall 0x8066281b: rtc_init+0x0/0x1aa() returned 0.
initcall 0x8066281b ran for 0 msecs: rtc_init+0x0/0x1aa()
Calling initcall 0x806629c5: hpet_init+0x0/0x69()
hpet_resources: 0xfed0 is busy
ACPI Error (utglobal-0126): Unknown exception code: 0xFFF0 [20070126]
On Sun, 20 May 2007 15:14:08 +0900 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:04:13AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2007 15:48:29 +0900 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:22:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri
On Sat, 19 May 2007 15:48:29 +0900 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:22:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:15:24 +0900 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
After finally catching fw-{ohci,core} to be problematic
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:15:24 +0900 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
After finally catching fw-{ohci,core} to be problematic during resume,
I'm now experiencing an immediate resume after suspending.
2.6.21-rc7-mm* didn't even suspend, my last known suspend-and-resuming
On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:37:01 +0200
Christian Leber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
i hit a problem with suspend to ram and especially resume.
Hardware: Dell Latitude D810 (some Intel 915 with Intel Pentium M)
With 2.6.19.7 suspend to ram works reliable, but with 2.6.20-rc4
it stopped
On Sun, 13 May 2007 18:12:50 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 02:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Still hangs in the same fashion, sorry.
It's peculiar that the hang happens when acpi_evaluate_object() hits its
return statement. Any theories
On Sat, 12 May 2007 22:10:07 +0200 Lukas Hejtmanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why the attached patch is still not included in mainline kernel? It fixes boot
problems after suspend to RAM.
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
[reboot.patch text/x-diff (564B)]
--- arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c.old
On Sun, 13 May 2007 18:48:07 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 10:07 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Can you send me your .config please ?
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-sony.txt
No luck.
I'm making progress. After fiddling with
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:07:39 +0200 Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I expect quite a few people will start seeing that. iirc it was
triggered by a couple of changes: a local_irq_save/local_irq_restore
in sched_clock() and a change
On Fri, 11 May 2007 23:09:15 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hm, Fedora don't seem to want to give me an RPM which contains acpidump
and
all the yum servers are featuring scrogged checksums. I could build it, I
guess, but there's a principle involved ;)
On Sat, 12 May 2007 10:46:03 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 23:56 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 23:09:15 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hm, Fedora don't seem to want to give me an RPM which contains
On Sat, 12 May 2007 11:18:09 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's peculiar that the hang happens when acpi_evaluate_object() hits its
return statement. Any theories there?
Only stack or memory corruption come into mind, but I have no clue how
this is related to the resume
On Sat, 12 May 2007 13:44:13 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lockdep complains about the lock nesting of clocksource and watchdog
lock in the resume path. Move watchdog resume out of the clocksource
lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 21:56:10 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 10:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
The broken-out queue should turn up at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/
in a few minutes.
Sigh. I can't reproduce your lockdep problem
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:12:07 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday, 10 May 2007 11:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 02:18 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
If that patch makes the problem go away, then we should have a quite
good hint what we need
On Fri, 11 May 2007 22:10:24 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Index: linux-2.6.21/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
===
--- linux-2.6.21.orig/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
+++
On Wed, 09 May 2007 23:26:22 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
can you test the alternative replacement patch for
clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
It does not touch the interrupt controller, it does the PIT restart
different. That's a patch from
On Tue, 8 May 2007 22:59:20 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:03:03 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixup the existing
On Wed, 09 May 2007 10:18:17 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 00:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
find an updated patch below. It fixes the problem on Ingo's
VAIO-of-fun-emulator and I got confirmation from several other affected
users
On Wed, 9 May 2007 01:22:57 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2007 10:18:17 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 00:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
find an updated patch below. It fixes the problem on Ingo's
VAIO-of-fun
On Wed, 9 May 2007 14:52:07 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew, could you please apply the appended patch and see if that
helps (should apply to -mm2)?
Argh, sorry. This needs yet another patch (sent for review to linux-pm) to
be applied. The following one is
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:43:33 - Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The local apic timer stop in C2 resp. C3 states is coupled with the
stop of the TSC. When the local apic timer is marked stable in C2
on the kernel commandline, then keep the TSC marked stable in C2 as well.
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:42:43 +0200 Maciej Rutecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUG: at kernel/kthread.c:166 kthread_bind()
[c01465ac] _cpu_down+0x16c/0x250
[c0146890] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x60/0xf0
[c014cd67] pm_suspend_disk+0x177/0x2c0
[c014b645] enter_state+0xb5/0x200
[c014b84d]
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:02:33 -0400 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
This batch mostly updates the platform-specific drivers that use ACPI.
The EC and sbs changes are primarily cleanups.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:04:58 +0200
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:39:19AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
2.6.21-rc6 boots up fine. Both rc6 and rc7 has a different problem -
the machine tends to hang after some
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:39:19 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Kosina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
2.6.21-rc6 boots up fine. Both rc6 and rc7 has a different problem -
the machine tends to hang after some minutes work in X. That hang is
unusual in that moving
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:33:52 +0530 Sunil Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I did compile 2.6.21-rc7 for a P-III machine. Here is the ACPI part in
the dmesg:-
ACPI Error (psargs-0355): [PRSE] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:00:42 -0500
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Vladimir Lebedev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/proc exports _BST in a single file, and _BST is re-evaulated
whenever that file is read.
Sometimes user-space reads this file frequently, and on some
systems _BST takes a long
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:04:35 +0200 (CEST)
Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -706,6 +718,8 @@ static int get_lcd_state(void)
{
int lcd = 0;
+ BUG_ON(!hotk-methods-lcd_status);
mutter. We could just warn-and-bale here.
Hopefully this is just an is-jiri-sane assertion and
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:37:03 +0200
Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
Side note, as Danny wrote, there is an asus-laptop driver sitting in -mm,
which supersedes this one -- if you plan to push it upstream in the near
future, don't bother with this patch.
Hmm,
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:13:55 -0400 (EDT)
Walter Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After hibernating, the CPU0 thermal zone never updates. It will stay at 59C
forever for example.
I've tried making the thermal driver a module and unloading it before
hibernating and it didn't help, also went
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Walter Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:13:55 -0400 (EDT)
Walter Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After hibernating, the CPU0 thermal zone never updates. It will stay at
59C
forever for example.
Yeah, John spotted a
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:03:38 +0200 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:32:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:36:47 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
0009-add-sonypi
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:02:03 -0700
Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64/acpi: make kernel to be compiled when CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA is set
and power management with acpi is not enabled
when CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA is set, and power management with acpi is not used. the
kernel can not be
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:33:36 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an old bug. It has been happening forever, but I'd love to
know how I can help get this tracked down and fixed.
Yes, I've been hitting something like that in the past 3-4 weeks. We
started to diagnose it but I got
I assume this is an acpi table bug.
Is there any way in which we can get a workaround in place to fix this for real?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:00:34 +0300 (EEST)
From: Mikko Tiihonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa [EMAIL
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:00:45 -0700 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/28/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:55:54 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My laptop (HP dv1240us) is always showing that my laptop is plugged
into AC power, even
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:55:54 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My laptop (HP dv1240us) is always showing that my laptop is plugged
into AC power, even when it is running off of the battery. When I
plug into the AC after running on the battery, the machine immediately
locks up. Also,
It looks like the cpuidle patches are doing incorrect things
with their kobject protocol.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:24:38 -0700
From: Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LKML linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:18:45 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8249
Summary: NMI watchdog detected LOCKUP when plugging USB devices
with acpi=off
Kernel Version: 2.6.21-rc4
Status: NEW
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:56:24 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/03/07 at 08:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:18:45 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8249
Summary: NMI watchdog detected LOCKUP
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:49:58 -0500
Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I configure 'CPU Idle PM Support' on my HP dv2125nr notebook with a
Turion X64 X2 processor and
X86_64 architecture selected, the computer freezes on bootup. I have included
a portion the
configuration file and
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:53:18 +0100 Antonio Mignolli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a slackware 10.2 on a HP/Compaq nx5000.
With kernels = 2.6.17.3 I didn't have problems.
Starting from 2.6.19 if I close the notebook's video,
or if I press the lid switch,
after a couple of
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:51:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8190
Summary: ehci_hcd can't reinitialize scanner after suspendresume
Kernel Version: 2.6.20, 2.6.21-rc3-gbe521466
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Guys, is this an acpi thing?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:01:12 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8193] New: Asus Notebooks only have full power off
the dc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8193
Summary:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:36:29 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8136
Let's take this to email.
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-06 15:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=10631)
--
it work as expected.
If there was some hidden reason why that was set to ACPI_D0, then perhaps a
config option for some ICH4 or HP laptops is called for.
Signed-off-by: Tommi Kyntola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi
I always get stuff like this coming out when I boot my x86_64 machine:
asus_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_unregister
asus_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_register
ibm_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_unregister
ibm_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_register
toshiba_acpi:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:43:12 -0500 Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:30:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
I always get stuff like this coming out when I boot my x86_64 machine:
asus_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_unregister
asus_acpi: Unknown
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:07:55 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:59:02 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming there is exactly 1 event for each press,
then the kernel part of this is healthy.
Assuming the failure is that the lid event
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:35:50 - (GMT) Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
2.6.21-rc1 fails to boot on my machine. As soon as I switch
from grub the screen turns and remains black with no sign
of Tux or any output.
I've run a git-bisect between 2.6.20 (which works fine) and
2.6.21-rc1
I'm starting to think that big acpi merge came a bit too soon.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:29:42 +0200 (EET)
From: Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux Kernel list linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ata-piix ACPI errors
Testbooted 2.6.21-rc1+todays git on a PC
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:38:03 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tested this:
commit 9654640d0af8f2de40ff3807d3695109d3463f54
and see 2 issues:
1. After suspend to RAM, system wakes up but no screen.
I can log in through ssh though.
dmesg output at this point below.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:59:02 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming there is exactly 1 event for each press,
then the kernel part of this is healthy.
Assuming the failure is that the lid event fails
to trigger the STD after a few iterations,
and you did this after the failure
Standard FC5 RH install, it is set up to suspend to disk when I close the
lid.
With git-acpi.patch applied, this just stops working on the second or third
attempt. It's like acpid just didn't see the lid close at all. Closing
the lid causes no kernel messages at all.
Any suggestions as to how
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:25:07 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 17 February 2007 01:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
Standard FC5 RH install, it is set up to suspend to disk when I close the
lid.
With git-acpi.patch applied, this just stops working on the second or third
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:50:35 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, I don't have a Sony laptop so I can't test this.
I'd like to see successful test feedback from Andrew,
Luming, and other Sony owners before we push it.
Seems to work. At least, I can still alter the brightness -
]
Since the bay driver depends on the dock driver for proper notification,
make
this driver depend on the dock driver.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/Kconfig |1 +
1 file changed, 1
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:56:02 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I acked this before, but I guess since it came back
that you're looking for me to check it in and somebody else
is handling the rest of your rtc patch series.
As it is ifdef'd so can't break anything if it goes in
This looks like something which needs attention prior to merging the new ACPI
code?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 04:57:01 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7958] New: AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT is beyond end of
object
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:22:06 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew,
This bug seem to be duplicate of 7907, which in turn seem to be caused
by latest libata patches.
Oh. Surprised. Let's tell Jeff about it.
Thanks,
Alex.
Andrew Morton wrote:
This looks like
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:07:34 -0800
David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way ... in case I was unclear about this, this does need to _follow_
the
patch defining the rtc-cmos driver and its platform data. Which I'm sure it
does in the MM tree, as it does in my own patchsets. :)
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:10:32 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CC arch/i386/kernel/traps.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/irq.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/time.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/ioport.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/ldt.o
CC
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:18:42 +0100
Maciej Rutecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton napisa__(a):
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm3/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:16:43 +0100
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 30.01.2007 23:18 schrieb Maciej Rutecki:
Second problem, power button doesn't work. When I pressed it, I has this
error:
ACPI Error (evevent-0305): No installed handler for fixed event
[0002] [20070126]
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 04:29:57 -0500
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 26 January 2007 20:24, Andrew Morton wrote:
The new stuff which just landed in Len's tree caused a huge mess in
arch/x86_64/kernel/genapic.c:clustered_apic_check() when applying
ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub
The new stuff which just landed in Len's tree caused a huge mess in
arch/x86_64/kernel/genapic.c:clustered_apic_check() when applying
ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/always-use-physical-delivery-mode-on-8-cpus
on top of it.
In fact the ACPI change has trashed a fair slice of
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:24:54 -0600
John Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add SN platform support for running with an ACPI
capable PROM that defines PCI devices in SSDT
tables. There is a SSDT table for every occupied
slot on a root bus, containing info for every
PPB and/or device on the bus.
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 20:15:12 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 11:09:44AM +0100, Stelian Pop wrote:
Le jeudi 04 janvier 2007 __ 00:24 -0500, Len Brown a __crit :
I'd like to keep this driver out-of-tree
until we prove that we can't enhance the
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:18:30 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The place to start (please) is the patches in -mm:
2.6-sony_acpi4.patch
sony_apci-resume.patch
sony_apci-resume-fix.patch
acpi-add-backlight-support-to-the-sony_acpi.patch
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:36:23 +0100
Stelian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added acpi_bus_generate event for forwarding Fn-keys pressed to acpi
subsystem,
and made correspondent necessary changes for this to work.
neato.
err, how does one use this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:54:32 +0100
Stelian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 04 janvier 2007 à 15:44 -0800, Andrew Morton a écrit :
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:36:23 +0100
Stelian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added acpi_bus_generate event for forwarding Fn-keys pressed to acpi
-off-by: Matthew C Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.c | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.c~asus_acpi-add-support-for-asus-z81sp
drivers/acpi
, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c~acpi-clear-gpe-before-disabling-it
drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c
):
acpi_ns_map_handle_to_node
acpi_ns_convert_entry_to_handle
acpi_ns_get_next_node
Signed-off-by: Aaron Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Luck, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have problems here. A large update has recently gone into the acpi devel
tree which trashes a lot of the acpi patches which I have thus far been
unable to get Len to pay attention to. It also trashes a large number of
x86_64 patches which I have thus far been unable to get Andi to pay
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:17:41 -0500
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The moral here is simple: x86_64 patches go through the x86_64 maintainer.
Please do not attempt to maintain foreign patches in the acpi tree.
Huh? What x86_64 patches are in the acpi tree?
I dunno. This:
101 - 200 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
