On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:54:41 -0500
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 December 2006 21:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:17:41 -0500
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The moral here is simple: x86_64 patches go through the x86_64
maintainer. Please do
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:01:40 -0500
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When will it be sent to Linus?
I cannot feasibly carry this work, the outstanding x86_64 work, the
outstanding i386 work and the outstanding ACPI work in -mm.
As the acpi patch is the one which has disrupted the
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:36:04 +0300
Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be better to replace sys_sched_yield() with cond_resched()?
I don't know, because I don't understand the dynamics of the proposed
change at all.
Again:
- How does it relate to
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:06:54 +0300
Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a patch reverted by Linus from rc6-git2 because it broke his
Compaq n620c, it refers to #5534 bug. Basically, kacpid deadlocks on
some new HP notebooks, and all incoming requests would be queued until
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:30:52 +0300
Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:06:54 +0300
Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a patch reverted by Linus from rc6-git2 because it broke his
Compaq n620c, it refers
:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
If this bug is still present in 2.6.19-rc5 could you please raise a report
at bugzilla.kernel.org?
Thanks.
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:47:24 +0200
Dalibor Straka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am often running out of memory. It looks like
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:31:28 +0100
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The scheduler on Andreas Friedrich's hyperthreading system stopped
working properly as of 2.6.18: the scheduler would never move tasks to
another CPU!
correction: the
This is with the full -mm lineup on my old Nocona Intel SDV machine:
Linux version 2.6.19-rc4-mm2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.0.2) #2 SMP
PREEMPT Wed Nov 1 23:20:15 PST 2006
Command line: root=/dev/sda3 profile=1 ro rhgb [EMAIL PROTECTED]/eth0,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/00:0D:56:C6:C6:CC
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:24:19 +0200
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static int set_lcd(int value)
+{
+ u32 hci_result;
+
+ value = value HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS_SHIFT;
+ hci_write1(HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS, value, hci_result);
+ if (hci_result != HCI_SUCCESS)
+
.
Note that with this patch and your .config, we get
arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c:91:2: warning: #warning ACPI uses CMPXCHG, i486
and later hardware
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Fixes a build problem with CONFIG_M386=y (include file dependenciers get
messy).
- Share
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:14:02 -0700
Moore, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're discussing this type of thing, I agree wholeheartedly:
static void acpi_processor_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void
*data) {
- struct acpi_processor *pr = (struct acpi_processor *)data;
+
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:56:02 -0400
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm okay applying this patch it touches the linux-specific
drivers/acpi/* files only, no ACPICA files.
Why?
Would it help if it was split into two?
How do mortals distinguish ACPICA files from Linux files?
But I don't
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:43:41 -0400
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 00:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:56:02 -0400
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm okay applying this patch it touches the linux-specific
drivers/acpi/* files only
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 03:10:56 +0200
Lennart Poettering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Lennart Poettering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A driver for the special features of MSI S270 laptops (and maybe other
MSI laptops). This driver implements a backlight device for
controlling LCD brightness
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:51:23 -0500
John Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First phase in introducing ACPI support to SN.
This:
--- gregkh-2.6.orig/include/linux/pci.h
+++ gregkh-2.6/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ extern struct bus_type pci_bus_type;
extern struct list_head
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:08:10 +0200
Alessandro Guido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make the sony_acpi use the backlight subsystem to adjust brightness value
instead of using the /proc/sony/brightness file.
(Other settings will still have a /proc/sony/... entry)
umm, OK, but now how do I adjust my
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:37:58 -0700
Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
32bit vs 64 bit issues. sizeof(sizeof) and sizeof(pointer) is variable,
but we're trying to shove it into unsigned int or u32.
...
- RSDT/XSDT length (%X) is smaller than minimum (%X),
+ RSDT/XSDT length (%X)
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:56:31 +0300
Ismail Donmez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
26 Eyl 2006 Sal 19:29 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
Andrea Gelmini a écrit :
Hi,
I've got a Sony Vaio VGN-SZ1VP (dmidecode[1] and lspci[2]).
Using default kernel (linux-image-2.6.15-27-686) of Ubuntu
cc added.
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:47:24 +0200
Dalibor Straka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am often running out of memory. It looks like an ACPI code is guilty:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep -i acpi /proc/slabinfo
Acpi-Operand3076 3127 64 591 : tunables 120 60 8 :
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 10:10:57 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 September 2006 21:25, Miles Lane wrote:
Ping...
I just reproduced this ACPI error with 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes +
a crypto patch from Herbert + two nodemgr patched from Stefan + a max
trace
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:55:11 +0200
Maciej Rutecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bjorn Helgaas napisał(a):
This ACPI unknown exception code problem is the same one reported here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-acpi%40vger.kernel.org/msg02873.html
Basically, we just need to revert
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:07:00 +0200
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Drivers should default to n.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.18-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/Kconfig.old 2006-09-07
00:49:37.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:00:47 +0200
Matthias Hentges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.6.18-rc5-mm1 oopses on an Asus P5W DH Deluxe board, full dmesg
attached.
This did not happen in 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
printing eip:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:56:09 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
PCI: If a device doesn't work, try pci=routeirq. If it helps, post a report
ACPI Error (utglobal-0125): Unknown exception code: 0xFFEA [20060707]
[dump_trace+100/418]
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:20:57 +0200
Maciej Rutecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton napisał(a):
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc4/2.6.18-rc4-mm2/
I have this entry in dmesg:
[ 23.701949] ACPI Error (utglobal-0125): Unknown exception
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:30:26 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6997
Could someone please take a look at this bug from an ACPI POV? I _think_
what's happened is that APCI decided to move his tg3 NIC onto a different
interrupt, causing it to collide with
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:01:42 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 14:30, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
It looks like the CMOS clock gets corrupted during the suspend to disk
on i386. I've observed this on 2 different boxes. Moreover, one of them
I have an old machine which doesn't use ACPI. During a reboot (sysrq-B)
I get
ACPI Warning (evxfevnt-0115): No FADT information present! [20060707]
It shouldn't print that if ACPI has disabled itself.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:58:52 +0800
Yu, Luming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what kernel you are using?
Is it due to a patch to reboot box with ACPI FADT reset register?
Actually, it's due to your patch ;)
See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6655
---
: Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/ac.c |2 ++
drivers/acpi/battery.c |3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff -puN drivers/acpi/ac.c~acpi-fix-boot-with-acpi=off drivers/acpi/ac.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/ac.c~acpi-fix-boot
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 23:22:14 +1200
Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/07/2006 9:11 p.m., Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc1/2.6.18-rc1-mm1/
- We're getting a relatively large number of crash reports coming out
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:33:12 -0700
Randy.Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
0: 258266 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
4:355 0 IO-APIC-edge serial
6: 5 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/executer/exmutex.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN
drivers/acpi/executer/exmutex.c~acpi-do-not-abort-method-execution-if-asked-to-release
drivers
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:10:08 -0400
Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the following on my laptop w/ 2.6.18-rc1.
thanks
-john
Stopping tasks:
===|
pnp: Device 00:0b disabled.
ACPI: PCI
) allowing people (I am probably the only one who tested this) with
W3000 to run kmilo.
Cc: Karol Kozimor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.c | 17 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/acpi
Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- work-mm7.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c 2006-06-30
11:52:18.0 -0600
+++ work-mm7/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c 2006-06-30 12:18:41.0
-0600
pnpacpi confuses me. Who maintains it? Is it considered an APCI thing, or
a
Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pnpacpi confuses me. Who maintains it? Is it considered an
APCI thing, or a PNP thing or a Bjorn thing?
PNP is Adam's generic Linux PNP layer.
It has drivers underneath is, such as pnp-isa, and pnp-bios
Shaohua invented pnp-acpi as a driver to
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:13:26 -0400
Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
Thanks for forwarding this series to Linus.
btw, this is, by my count, the seventh time I've sent this patch.
what is your point?
That when someone sends someone else a patch, it's a request that it be
merged.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 02:30:13 -0400
Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NAK, per Shaohua's comments in the bug report.
...
This patch fixes bug 6292
(http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6292).
Sigh. Uwe is available to test patches, should any happen to get written.
-
To
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:53:22 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Do you have CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y?
I rebuilt with all the PCI hotplug stuff enabled.
dmesg output suggests I don't have this hardware:
pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
fakephp: Fake PCI
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 03:40:36 -0400
Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing jumps out at me as incorrect above, so
at this point it looks like a CONFIG_LOCKDEP artifact --
but lets ask the experts:-)
Yes, lockdep uses the callsite of spin_lock_init() to detect
the type of
a lock.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:52:08 +0100
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:32:51PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Disable ACPI on some Phoenix BIOS, or the system will freeze.
Yeah, this was a quick workaround. I think we'd probably be better off
figuring out /why/
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:28:56 -0400
Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like an ACPI problem.
Thanks for the note, and the .config, I reproduced it here.
CONFIG_LOCKDEP complains about this sequence:
...
presumed previous acquire/release acpi_gbl_hardware_lock
...
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:14:22 +0100
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some VIA southbridges contain a flag in the ACPI register space that
indicates whether an abnormal poweroff has occured, presumably with the
intention that it can be cleared on clean shutdown. Some BIOSes check
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:54:29 +0100
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP might be a better choice than CONFIG_ACPI,
yes.
OK, I diddled the diff to use CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Bongani Hlope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -342,7 +341,10 @@ static int acpi_ec_poll_read(union acpi_
return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(ec-poll.lock, flags);
+ if (down_interruptible(ec
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:00:43 -0700
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[UBUNTU:acpi] Add IBM R60E laptop to proc-idle blacklist.
Reference:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/38228
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:54:36 +0200
From: Ojciec Rydzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-kernel linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Several errors in kernel
Hello!
I have compiled new kernel to my laptop and I found several errors.
Please help me to solve them:
*
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:32:17 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure whether this is an error that needs following up on.
My machine is a HP dv1240us (Pavillion laptop). I ran dmesg | grep -i acpi:
BIOS-e820: 3dee - 3deec000 (ACPI data)
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 21:58:29 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
include/asm/semaphore.h:9 9
in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1
[c0104851] show_trace+0xd/0x10
[c010486b] dump_stack+0x17/0x1c
[c011448c] __might_sleep+0x93/0x9d
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 22:23:24 -0700
Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't send word-wrapped emails.
[ 355.081000] swsusp: Need to copy 59004 pages
[ 355.081000] Intel machine check architecture supported.
[ 355.081000] Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
[
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:36:01 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ACPI: RSDP (v000 COMPAQ) @ 0x000f4fd0
ERROR: Invalid checksum
...
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20050902
ACPI: Interpreter disabled.
Looks like ACPI doesn't like your BIOS tables. After that ACPI
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 12:09:14 -0700
Moore, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will not always be the case, in fact we are about to expand the use
of the spinlock interfaces.
Sure, but this function is absolutely crackers. All it does is to
dynamically allocate and initialise a spinlock. But
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 11:31:11 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Possible kernel memory leaks
Hi,
There are some possible kernel memory leaks discovered by kmemleak. I
didn't have time for investigating them.
Sergio Monteiro Basto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok here it goes the state of applying this 16 patches against 2.6.17-rc4
Patches
1 2 out of date (n out of m hunks FAILED)
3 4 ok
5 out of date
6 ok
7 8 9 10 out of date
11 12 13 ok
14 out of date
15 16 ok
Thanks, but I
]
- make pm_idle_save, nocst and bm_history __read_mostly
- static first_run is initialized to 0 by default already
Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |8
1
The latest
git+ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git#test
kills my very vanilla P4 box.
Without:
Linux Plug and Play Support v0.97 (c) Adam Belay
pnp: PnP ACPI init
pnp: PnP ACPI: found 15 devices
PnPBIOS: Disabled by ACPI PNP
SCSI subsystem initialized
PCI:
Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:10:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
The above bug appears to trigger a scsi or sym2 bug. With git-acpi.patch
present I get
sym0: 895 rev 0x2 at pci :02:0c.0 irq 9
sym0: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-40, SE, parity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6519
Guys, there's some mystification as to what subsystem could have caused
this person's CPU Disconnect Control to break. Andi thinks perhaps ACPI.
Can someone please confirm that and if so, assign the report?
Thanks.
-
Kristen Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Create a driver which lives in the acpi subsystem to handle dock events.
This
driver is not an acpi driver, because acpi drivers require that the object
be present when the driver is loaded.
...
+/**
+ * add_dock_dependent_device - associate a
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting the following compile error with CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y:
-- snip --
...
CC drivers/acpi/numa.o
drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function 'acpi_numa_init':
drivers/acpi/numa.c:231: error: 'NR_NODE_MEMBLKS' undeclared (first use in
this
Yasunori Goto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/* Proximity bitmap length */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NR_NODES_CHANGABLE
+#define MAX_PXM_DOMAINS CONFIG_NR_NODES
+#else
+#define MAX_PXM_DOMAINS (256)
+#endif
I don't think we need CONFIG_NR_NODES_CHANGABLE (it is spelled
changeable, btw).
If the
Yasunori Goto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING: remove_memory [drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.ko] undefined!
WARNING: add_memory [drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.ko] undefined!
WARNING: acpi_os_allocate [drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.ko] undefined!
Does it actually make sense to load
Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Biscani napsal(a):
Hello,
sometimes at boot I get the following from the logs:
ACPI: write EC, IB not empty
ACPI Exception (evregion-0409): AE_TIME, Returned by Handler for
WARNING: remove_memory [drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.ko] undefined!
WARNING: add_memory [drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.ko] undefined!
WARNING: acpi_os_allocate [drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.ko] undefined!
Does it actually make sense to load acpi_memhotplug.ko as a module? Will
it all work?
-
To
Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonder if this is related to rc6's oops?
gcc 4.0.3
CC [M] arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.o
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c: In function
'centrino_target':
include/linux/bitmap.h:170: warning:
]
check_acpi_pci() is called from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c even if
CONFIG_ACPI is not defined, but the code in include/asm/acpi.h doesn't
provide it in this case.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/asm/acpi.h | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff
Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:45:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew! Folks!
check_acpi_pci() is called form arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
even if CONFIG_ACPI is not defined, but the code
Kenji Kaneshige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch fixes a serious bug in ACPI based CPU hotplug code. Because
of this bug, ACPI based CPU hotplug will always fail if NR_CPUS is
equal to or more than 255.
Looks rather similar to
I seem to have a lot of stuff saved up here. As usual, please either merge
them, or ask the originators to change them, or nack them with reason,
thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ACPI should depend on, not select PCI.
It's surprising that there's any such linkage, actually. Is it
impossible for a non-PCI system to have ACPI?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
/processor_core.c:483: warning: comparison is always false due to
limited range of data type
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 10
Jean-Marc Valin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A while ago I reported a regression (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/21/290)
in suspend to RAM that happened with kernel 2.6.12 on my Dell D600
laptop. After several months of testing (this is my work machine and the
bug takes time to reproduce), I
The ec-burst thing seems to be causing quite a lot of problems out there.
Is there something we can do for 2.6.16?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:58:09 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6111] New: Acpi defunct -- buttons, battery
Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is that it that on the grand scale of bugs serious enough
to have an effect on the course of 2.6.16, this one doesn't qualify
unless the same issue is seen on other systems.
I think we can assume that it will be seen there. 2.6.16 is going into
of the region, not _MAX - _MIN + 1.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/hpet.c |5 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/char/hpet.c~hpet-fix-acpi-memory-range-length-handling
drivers
Joerg Sommrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a processor idle module for AMD SMP 760MP(X) based systems.
The patch was originally written by Tony Lindgren and has been around
since 2002. It enables C2 mode on AMD SMP systems and thus saves
about 70 - 90 W of energy in the idle mode
Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/01/2006 1:21 a.m., Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.15/2.6.15-mm3/
- New config options (VMSPLIT_*) to permit non-standard user/kernel
splitting on x86. Needs testing please
Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) acpi-cpufreq does not load either, returns ENODEV too. It's probably
git-acpi. I tried to revert it but there are lots of other patches
depending on it, so I finally gave up
Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) acpi-cpufreq does not load either, returns ENODEV too. It's probably
git-acpi. I tried to revert it but there are lots of other patches
depending on it, so I finally gave up.
OK, let me try to reproduce this. acpi and cpufreq are fully merged up, so
201 - 280 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
