Hi,
On Wednesday, 11 July 2007 05:14, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:59:48 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:39:37AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, that is a bit confusing. At the moment, I'm doing the suspend to
ram
platform
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 20:09:04 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 July 2007 05:14, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:59:48 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:39:37AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, that is a bit confusing. At the
On Wednesday, 11 July 2007 12:14, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 20:09:04 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 July 2007 05:14, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:59:48 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:39:37AM +1000, Nigel
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, the bit I consider to be ugly is opening the files from within the
kernel, but it seemed to be necessary in order to provide the functionality
without having to rely on userspace or do some sort of messy work to figure
out how to access
Hi.
On Thursday 12 July 2007 02:04:33 David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, the bit I consider to be ugly is opening the files from within the
kernel, but it seemed to be necessary in order to provide the
functionality
without having to rely on
On Monday 09 July 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:26:32 David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 07:44:03PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Better a /sys/power/wakeup_event (or whatever) that's more
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 02:51:03 David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:26:32 David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 07:44:03PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:16:40AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, the bit I consider to be ugly is opening the files from within the
kernel, but it seemed to be necessary in order to provide the functionality
without having to rely on userspace or do some sort of messy work to figure
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 10:45:50 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:16:40AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, the bit I consider to be ugly is opening the files from within the
kernel, but it seemed to be necessary in order to provide the
functionality
without
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:53:35AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 10:45:50 Matthew Garrett wrote:
How are you going to shift into suspend to disk without going via
userspace? It's quite plausible that people will want different
configuration at that point (or,
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:23:02 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:53:35AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 10:45:50 Matthew Garrett wrote:
How are you going to shift into suspend to disk without going via
userspace? It's quite plausible
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:39:37AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, that is a bit confusing. At the moment, I'm doing the suspend to ram
platform dependent preparation and cleanup in this scenario. That's
definitely the right thing to do in the case where we write an image, then
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:59:48 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:39:37AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, that is a bit confusing. At the moment, I'm doing the suspend to ram
platform dependent preparation and cleanup in this scenario. That's
definitely the
Hi.
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:26:32 David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 07:44:03PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Better a /sys/power/wakeup_event (or whatever) that's more easily
found. It could link to the device issuing the
14 matches
Mail list logo
