This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc3 compared to 2.6.18
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
Quoting r. Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: T60 stops triggering any ACPI events
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/4/425
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/16/262
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7408
> Submitter : "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[E
Hi Michael,
> 2.6.19-rc3 without reverting
> d7dd8fd9557840162b724a8ac1366dd78a12dff stops receiving ACPI events after some
> use (sometimes after suspend/resume, sometimes after kernel build stress).
Now,
> what does this tell us? Andrew, any idea?
The code is related to bd_claim_by_disk whic
Quoting r. Jun'ichi Nomura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3)
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > 2.6.19-rc3 without reverting
> > d7dd8fd9557840162b724a8ac1366dd78a12dff stops receiving ACPI events after
> some
> > us
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
>
> The code is related to bd_claim_by_disk which is called when
> device-mapper or md tries to mark the underlying devices
> for exclusive use and creates symlinks from/to the devices
> in sysfs. The patch added error handlings which weren't in
> the
Hi Michael,
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
The code is related to bd_claim_by_disk which is called when
device-mapper or md tries to mark the underlying devices
for exclusive use and creates symlinks from/to the devices
in sysfs. The patch added error handlings which weren't in
the original code.
I
Hi Linus,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Actually, looking closer at the code, the patch seems to add _incorrect_
error handling.
For example, look at bd_claim_by_kobject(): if the "bd_claim()" inside of
it succeeds, we used to always return success. Now, we don't necessarily
do that: we may have don
Quoting r. Jun'ichi Nomura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3)
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> The code is related to bd_claim_by_disk which is called when
> >> device-mapper or md t
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
>
> Please revert the patch. I'll fix the wrong error handling.
>
> I'm not sure reverting the patch solves the ACPI problem
> because Michael's kernel seems not having any user of
> bd_claim_by_kobject.
Yeah, doing a grep does seem to imply that the
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:16:34AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>...
> I assume that "compile the kernel" just triggers some magic ACPI event
> (probably fan-related due to heat), and I wonder if the bisection faked
> you out because once you get "close enough" the differences are small
> enough
Quoting r. Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3)
>
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> >
> > Please revert the patch. I'll fix the wrong error handling.
> >
> > I
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Martin's original bug report stated "now I loose ACPI events after
> suspend/resume. not every time, but roughly 3 out of 4 times."
> This seems to support your theory.
>
> But considering that two people have independently reported this as a
> 2.6.19
Quoting r. Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Martin, Michael, can you send complete "dmesg -s 100" for both
> 2.6.18.1 and a non-working 2.6.19-rc kernel after resume?
> I don't have high hopes, but perhaps looking at the dmesg and/or
> diff'ing them might give a hint.
OK, I'll try to go ba
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:35:22PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:16:34AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[...]
> Martin, Michael, can you send complete "dmesg -s 100" for both
> 2.6.18.1 and a non-working 2.6.19-rc kernel after resume?
> I don't have high hopes, but perha
Quoting r. Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3)
>
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> >
> > Please revert the patch. I'll fix the wrong error handling.
> >
> > I
15 matches
Mail list logo
