Linux-Advocacy Digest #435, Volume #34 Fri, 11 May 01 21:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: The Microsoft PATH. (GreyCloud)
Re: Linux is paralyzed before it even starts (Terry Porter)
Re: Microsoft's move away from perpetual licensing proves that the (GreyCloud)
Re: Alan Cox responds
Linux-Advocacy Digest #435, Volume #33Sat, 7 Apr 01 15:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: XP = eXPerimental (J Sloan)
Re: US Navy carrier to adopt Win2k infrastructure (Goldhammer)
Re: Is StarOffice 5.2 "compatible" w/MS Office 97/2000? ("Les Mikesell")
Re: Why do
Linux-Advocacy Digest #435, Volume #32 Fri, 23 Feb 01 17:13:05 EST
Contents:
WANT TO MAKE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS (DSpeedy7996)
Re: SSH vulnerabilities - still waiting [ was Interesting article ] (The Ghost In
The Machine)
Re: Into the abyss... (Matthew Gardiner)
Re: SSH
Linux-Advocacy Digest #435, Volume #29Tue, 3 Oct 00 21:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Corel bailed out by MS? Let the games begin! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Why should anyone prefer Linux to Win2k on the DeskTop ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (Donovan Rebb
Linux-Advocacy Digest #435, Volume #28 Wed, 16 Aug 00 13:13:09 EDT
Contents:
Re: Are Linux people illiterate? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: The dusty Linux shelves at CompUSA (Craig Kelley)
Re: OS advertising in the movies... (was Re: Microsoft MCSE) (Nathaniel Jay Lee)
Linux-Advocacy Digest #435, Volume #27Mon, 3 Jul 00 02:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Hardware: ideal budget Linux box? (Re: I'm Ready! I'm ready! I'm (Aaron
Kulkis)
Re: LIE-nux is SUPPOST to destroy data (was: Re: This is a Troll, do (Aaron Kulkis)
Re: Linsux as a desktop
Linux-Advocacy Digest #435, Volume #26 Wed, 10 May 00 05:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: Which Flavour Is Best? ("none2")
Re: This is Bullsh^%T!!! ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create software (John Poltorak)
NYC LOCAL: 10 May 2
