On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 20:11 +, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
[snip]
are you saying that this suil api will get it implicit and integrated
into slv2? in a matter of days? i've looked into the suil.h and it
makes perfect sense...
I've done this now[1]. The half-baked collection API in Suil as of my
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 04:19:05 -0500, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 20:11 +, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
[snip]
are you saying that this suil api will get it implicit and
integrated
into slv2? in a matter of days? i've looked into the suil.h and it
makes perfect
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:40:01AM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:01 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/23 Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com:
On 2/22/11, David Robillard wrote:
Before I totally forget about it... I think it might be a very
On 23 February 2011 23:55, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net wrote:
They're all in my LAD meta-repository:
Ah, externals.
LGPL I see -- I've no problem with that in principle, but it would
complicate matters a bit (both Dataquay and Redland being BSD).
if you're just interested in Turtle +
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:41:56PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
and to answer that question: what happened was huge great
boatloads of data that need to be shovelled around between all the
relevant components, complicated synchronization in both the backend
models and the user interfaces of all
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:11:33PM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
Entirely Redland free. I hand-wrote a Turtle parser and serialiser.
In short, it's been a PITA for everyone in numerous ways since day one.
Congratulations. I mean it. This is probably the best move in the entire
history of
Stefano wanted to know whether someone was starting something he was
interested in because he might want to contribute, if I understood him
correctly.
But I don't think it is really common practice (or even good form?, but
that's very debatable) to announce something if you are not ready to
On 02/24/2011 12:43 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
It's also foolish to suggest that the 'all inclusive universal
DAW' will cater for those needs - just ignore what you don't
use etc. It most definitely does *not* because it's by no means
as universal as you may think, but rather the reflection of
On 02/24/2011 12:43 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Spending some money on Protools is not really different to doing
the same for a kilometer of microphone cable or some XLR plugs.
imnsho, this simile only holds if you intend to hang yourself with the
microphone cable.
On 02/24/2011 12:47 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:11:33PM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
Entirely Redland free. I hand-wrote a Turtle parser and serialiser.
In short, it's been a PITA for everyone in numerous ways since day one.
Congratulations. I mean it.
seconded.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:41:56PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
and to answer that question: what happened was huge great
boatloads of data that need to be shovelled around between all the
relevant components, complicated
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
There's no doubt that many users or potential users want the
'all integrated' DAW combining audio, sequencing, invasive
effects, etc. required to produce a particular type of music
(and some other content, e.g. ads) that happens to have
On 02/23/2011 11:16 PM, David Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 20:05 +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
Note: all posts to LAA are being moderated. Once they make it through
moderation, the message will get on the linuxaudio.org front-page and is
automatically added to planet LAD. If you prefer
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/02/the-79-virtual-analog-console-now-on-both-mac-and-linux-harrison-mixbus/
Coming from the rarified world of high-end audio systems, we
recognized a lot of the same
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:07:41PM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
There's no doubt that many users or potential users want the
'all integrated' DAW combining audio, sequencing, invasive
effects, etc. required to produce a
Hello Robin,
On 02/23/2011 08:28 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:22 AM, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
Hi,
On 02/17/2011 10:53 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us
kernel-source/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:02:21AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
i don't agree with you that its about a type of music. it is about the
difference between some different ways of producing music, and not
just two of them. there are certainly approaches to making music that
are not well served by a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:02:21AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
i don't agree with you that its about a type of music. it is about the
difference between some different ways of producing music, and not
just two of them.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:17:17AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:02:21AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
Well, I could pay or I could offer my time as a developer. During
the last five years I have
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:28 AM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:17:17AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:02:21AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
Well, I could pay or I could
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 09:39 +, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 04:19:05 -0500, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 20:11 +, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
[snip]
are you saying that this suil api will get it implicit and
integrated
into slv2? in
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:17:17AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
what you don't know (because you're not on IRC) is the question of
N-point editing comes up a lot. i (and others) have argued (in my
opinion quite successfully) that four point editing is a relic of an
older workflow. others who have
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:48 +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On 23 February 2011 23:55, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net wrote:
They're all in my LAD meta-repository:
Ah, externals.
LGPL I see -- I've no problem with that in principle, but it would
complicate matters a bit (both Dataquay and
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 11:47 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:11:33PM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
Entirely Redland free. I hand-wrote a Turtle parser and serialiser.
In short, it's been a PITA for everyone in numerous ways since day one.
Congratulations. I
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 13:08 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On 02/24/2011 12:43 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
It's also foolish to suggest that the 'all inclusive universal
DAW' will cater for those needs - just ignore what you don't
use etc. It most definitely does *not* because it's by no
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:17:17AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
what you don't know (because you're not on IRC) is the question of
N-point editing comes up a lot. i (and others) have argued (in my
opinion quite
On 02/24/2011 06:39 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
well, panners in a3 are now plugins, of a fashion (they are a bit
different from normal plugin APIs for a variety of reasons, primarily
the fact that they never do in-place processing). its quite likely
that at least the simplest of your ambi LADSPA
On 02/24/2011 03:59 PM, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
Hello Robin,
Now, say I'm only focusing on playback now. Is there something wrong with
calling a blocking output API from a realtime thread as I ask below?
mmh. it depends on how the blocking is done. If it is a spin-lock it
will consume CPU
On Thursday 24 February 2011 18:09:19 David Robillard wrote:
To resolve this situation, we now have an exciting new Clippy inspired
assistant that hops around your screen begging you to add MIDI tracks
constantly.
Will you call it ardourino?
If, after 20 minutes, you have still not created a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de
You couldn't get the rights to use the amen-break for this?
dude we don't use no breaks unless its when the levee breaks, is
that clear? problem is, jimmy and the boys in zep wouldn't clear the
sample for us, so ...
we're
The amen break has no rights attached to it. It was a gift from the gods. Now
whether or not those gods love or hate us is another matter...
Michael
- Original Message
From: Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de
To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Sent: Thu, February 24, 2011
On 02/24/2011 07:01 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 02/24/2011 03:59 PM, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
Hello Robin,
Now, say I'm only focusing on playback now. Is there something wrong with
calling a blocking output API from a realtime thread as I ask below?
mmh. it depends on how the blocking is
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Michael Bechard gothma...@yahoo.comwrote:
The amen break has no rights attached to it. It was a gift from the gods.
Now
whether or not those gods love or hate us is another matter...
As far as I know the Winstons own the copyright (well... used to anyway, it
Heh, yeah, I know. I was more commenting on how every DJ on the planet has
treated that sample. :)
Michael
From: Harry Van Haaren harryhaa...@gmail.com
To: Michael Bechard gothma...@yahoo.com
Cc: Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de;
On Thursday 24 February 2011 12:09:19 David Robillard wrote:
This is, of course, a big problem in terms of our greater mission
to provide software that caters to the needs of precisely nobody while
irritating everybody else.
To resolve this situation, we now have an exciting new Clippy
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:39:04PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
the position that i take with N-point editing is not that there is
some other way to do the following. There isn't. its that the way of
approaching the task that leads to needing to do the following is
rooted in an older way of
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:39:04PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
the position that i take with N-point editing is not that there is
some other way to do the following. There isn't. its that the way of
approaching the task
On 2/24/11, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
the position that i take with N-point editing is not that there is
some other way to do the following. There isn't. its that the way of
approaching the task that leads to needing to do the following is
rooted in an older way of thinking about the overall
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:20:44AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
You know, I find this kind of attitude quite dangerous.
What attitude ?
JAMin developers not having clue,
Didn't write that.
Ardour developers not having and clue
About one very specfic issue.
This is an error that
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:12:58PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:39:04PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
the position that i take with N-point editing is not that there is
some other way to do the
You are full of even more shit than I am - can you just f-off and write your
own
DAW? Or at least go and write apps for an OS that has other developer lists.
we have to make sure that old fag [Fons] does disappear”.
Jim Wong, president of IT products, Acer
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:58:12
On 2/25/11, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
You know, I find this kind of attitude quite dangerous.
What attitude ?
See below.
JAMin developers not having clue,
Didn't write that.
*sigh*
Really?
'True. After all those years none of the 'DSP experts' developing Jamin
has noticed anything wrong
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:05:03AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
'True. After all those years none of the 'DSP experts' developing Jamin
has noticed anything wrong when listening to it (it's quite obvious
actually), let alone done a simple measurement that could have revealed
this
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:39 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:20:44AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
[...]
This is an error that any DSP student is allowed to make once.
This is absolutely true for the one I referred to.
As absolutely true as when I say the
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:47:10PM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:39 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:20:44AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
[...]
This is an error that any DSP student is allowed to make once.
This is absolutely true
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 00:34 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
I learned that 'ingen' is Swedish for 'no, nobody, nothing' or
similar...
Nobody it is.
--
Brand new stockings
http://mx44.linux.dk/notturno/brand_new_stockings.mp3
___
Linux-audio-dev
46 matches
Mail list logo
