On 03/12/2013 04:23 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
Hi, I need some advice, clear up some confusion:
I noticed our app uses this pan formula:
vol_L = volume * (1.0 - pan);
vol_R = volume * (1.0 + pan);
where volume is the fader value, pan is the pan knob value
which ranges between -
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:23:02AM -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:
> I noticed our app uses this pan formula:
>
> vol_L = volume * (1.0 - pan);
> vol_R = volume * (1.0 + pan);
>
> where volume is the fader value, pan is the pan knob value
> which ranges between -1.0 and 1.0, and vol_L a
On March 12, 2013 08:41:01 PM you wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 04:23 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
> > Hi, I need some advice, clear up some confusion:
> >
> > I noticed our app uses this pan formula:
> > vol_L = volume * (1.0 - pan);
> > vol_R = volume * (1.0 + pan);
> >
> > where volume is the
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
> lance, but slightly different levels, but not a true 'stereo pan'.
>
> But having said that, yes I'm wondering about a true 'stereo pan' feature.
>
first, terminology. just as when describing track or bus I/O configuration,
"mono" and 'stereo
On March 12, 2013 03:08:18 PM Tim E. Real wrote:
> On March 12, 2013 08:41:01 PM you wrote:
> > On 03/12/2013 04:23 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
> > > Hi, I need some advice, clear up some confusion:
> > >
> > > I noticed our app uses this pan formula:
> > > vol_L = volume * (1.0 - pan);
> > > vol_R
On March 12, 2013 03:13:44 PM you wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
lance, but slightly different levels, but not a true 'stereo pan'.
But having said that, yes I'm wondering about a true 'stereo pan' feature.
first, terminology. just as when describing track or bu
On March 12, 2013 09:56:15 AM Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:23:02AM -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:
> > I noticed our app uses this pan formula:
> > vol_L = volume * (1.0 - pan);
> > vol_R = volume * (1.0 + pan);
> >
> > where volume is the fader value, pan is the pan
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
>
> I will look at having separate pan controls for each channel on one strip,
> as I'm reminded from talking to Paul that Ardour has this :)
>
not anymore ...
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-
On March 12, 2013 04:28:19 PM you wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
I will look at having separate pan controls for each channel on one strip,
as I'm reminded from talking to Paul that Ardour has this :)
not anymore ...
Oh wow, haven't tried A3 yet.
[Looks at,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:24:49PM -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:
> Interesting about the crossover bit.
> Wow, I considered adding selectable pan laws but didn't realize crossovers.
The rationale behind this is that at LF the L and R signals will add more
or less in phase, while at HF the phases a
10 matches
Mail list logo