On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:06:24 +0200 Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On 08/11/14 05:47, D. Sen wrote:
> > I was advised by Paul Davis to inquire on this list whether there has
> > been or is likely to be any activity in developing ALSA drivers for the
> > RME Madiface XT device. Its a USB device and as such ma
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:11:33PM +0100, Will Godfrey wrote:
> A long time ago ... in a land far away :)
> I did some assembler programming on the Acorn Archimedes (ARM 2/3) and worked
> out a series of additions and subtractions that would perform very fast
> multiplication of awkward numbers by
On 08/18/2014 07:11 PM, Will Godfrey wrote:
A long time ago ... in a land far away :)
I did some assembler programming on the Acorn Archimedes (ARM 2/3) and worked
out a series of additions and subtractions that would perform very fast
multiplication of awkward numbers by known amounts.
Is there
A long time ago ... in a land far away :)
I did some assembler programming on the Acorn Archimedes (ARM 2/3) and worked
out a series of additions and subtractions that would perform very fast
multiplication of awkward numbers by known amounts.
Is there any point in doing this for C programs, or ar
On 08/18/2014 10:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Qtractor the fader for synth plugins is pre everything ;), that's bad
design, but I guess not the audio stream is controlled, but the synth
volume.
while on midi tracks, qtractor mixer/track faders simply deals midi
channel volume (cc#7) and panning
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> I would think ((Gain+54)/64)*7f uses a lot less CPU time than a real
> (proper) log. Think 8 fingers (plus thumbs?) fading around 80 steps in a
> small time. Remember that this calculation has to be done at both ends too
> and the receiv
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 11:00 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 17:44 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> > On a DAW, we sort of do this already by recording using the fader (and
> > audio device gain) for trim and then mixing down using the fader for fine
> > tuning. However, as I commented
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 17:44 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> On a DAW, we sort of do this already by recording using the fader (and
> audio device gain) for trim and then mixing down using the fader for fine
> tuning. However, as I commented earlier, sometimes a harsh effect can
> introduce the need to
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 08:24 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 09:45 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> >> A quick thought on fineness of control. It is true that 127 levels
> >> tends to "zipper". However, 127 levels is more than enough for static
