[LAD] Re: Status of Pipewire

2023-02-10 Thread Len Ovens
On 2023-02-08 04:03, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: I recently reinstalled my uses Manjaro (Arch-based) and I see I _do_ have a 'pipewire' package installed, but it looks like I'm actually running pulseaudio (?) and am able to run jack and use my jack-pulseaudio sink _if_ needed - as I have usually done

[LAD] Re: Status of Pipewire - Ryzen 5

2023-02-10 Thread Will Godfrey
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 20:18:59 + John Rigg wrote: >On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:33:18PM +, Will Godfrey wrote: >> >> Something that may (or may not be related) >> There seems to be something odd with Linux image 6.1 preempt >> >> On a Ryzen 5, Rosegarden keeps randomly losing the transport t

[LAD] Re: Status of Pipewire

2023-02-10 Thread Len Ovens
I think it is too bad that pipewire does not just use the system libjack and allow setting server name. Then both could run as separate jack servers. Building a Jack->jack bridge with SRC would not be too hard either. For many people, leaving pw server to default would just work but for others

[LAD] Re: Status of Pipewire - Ryzen 5

2023-02-10 Thread John Rigg
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 06:32:36PM +, Will Godfrey wrote: > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 20:18:59 + > John Rigg wrote: > >Have you turned off hyperthreading on the Ryzen system (usually called SMT in > >BIOS settings on AMD)? I keep SMT turned off on my Ryzen systems to avoid > >possible scheduling

[LAD] Re: Status of Pipewire

2023-02-10 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Wim Taymans wrote: > real JACK is more mature and does things differently (mostly device > wakeup with IRQ instead of timers) The real difference between the two methods is 'sample count' versus 'time' as the source of the event that starts a period. I a