>please read the subject line!
>it's about the new-session-management move to jackaudio.org and only.
>it is NOT about the merits, technical or otherwise, of session managers in
>general nor NSM in particular.
Then let me rephrase:
Why should NSM not be hosted under jackaudio, since it is the ses
On 04/04/21 21:31, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>Although I still don't understand what jackaudio.org has to do with the
>new(er)-session-management (aka "NSM fork") and why it is now moved from
>linuxaudio.org to jackaudio.org.
I am paraphrasing my answer from the LinuxMusiciansForum. I copied that