Nick Copeland wrote:
will not sound like an Oberheim.
PS:
And there's no need to sound identically. Even if a programme should
program something absolutely new, not an emulation, the 'Prophet
*5*'-'Matrix *6*'-Effect of having less voices, could add some charm.
Btw. I never used the Alsa
VU meter: Maybe you should call it 'analogVUemu'.
Phase correlator: Yep, some people generally spilt frequencies at around
200, resp. 250 Hz before they add effects or they avoid to panorama deep
sounds. A phase correlator can be mistaken, because of some single
sounds that don't matter in the
Fraser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Knoth wrote:
Just a note: I personally don't like VUs in the digital domain.
agree, their primary purpose is a bit meaningless.
I prefer Bob Katz' K metering system (K12, K14, K20) with well
PS:
The effective value is sine wave +3dB = 0 and nothing else. Am I wrong? *Just
for dBFS*
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
TU Berlin: Lediglich bei den Rundfunkanstalten besteht wegen des
Austauschs von Programmmaterial
auch über die Landesgrenzen hinweg die Notwendigkeit von einheitlichen
Richtlinien. Da-
bei gilt in Europa ein Übernahmepegel von +18 dBu für 0 dBFS (EBU R68),
in den USA
+24 dBu (SMPTE RP155).
On
Dan Mills wrote:
The key is that every stage has to have a known calibration, which is
actually fairly common with professional cards.
Okay :) I don't know professional cards for home recording myself and
the professional studios I know have external VU meters. For my Envy24
based sound card
David Robillard wrote:
using your desktop theme which might be bad, too.
Ick! Using the desktop theme is not bad! The user chose it for a
reason!
Less atrocious and weird looking skinned UI's designed by seemingly
half-blind artistically retarded programmers, please :)
-dr
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
Really, an Atari ST is more responsive.
For me TOS is still the best OS for MIDI usage with external MIDI
equipment, but this isn't true, the Atari ST's response is very good
when using a Blitter, but very bad when not using a Blitter.
For Linux I noticed, that when
*???* Pulseaudio, 64-bit and JACK are a strange issue. I'm using 64-bit,
the proprietary flash for 64-bit and I can run JACK, use audio software,
e.g. Qtractor and at the same time watch YouTube etc.. Pulseaudio is not
installed. Am I missing something, because I don't have Pulseaudio?
Ralf
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
For me TOS is still the best OS for MIDI usage with external MIDI
equipment, but this isn't true, the Atari ST's response is very good
when using a Blitter, but very bad when not using a Blitter.
For Linux I noticed, that when
Vincent Torri wrote:
E17 looks well, but when I used it a long time ago on another machine
it was disgusting experimental ;).
well, we work hard for a release, so a lot of things has been fixed /
stabilized. Maybe you can try it again.
I'll try it again.
I can't play the OGG? Are you
Thomas Vecchione wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net mailto:ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
You are confusing Copyright and Trademark Law. Copyright law
says that yes
they can fork the project.
Trademark
Apropos wasting resources. A lot of Linux audio applications don't have
EQs by default for the channels of a mixer, we need to add 20 LADSPA EQs
to 20 channels. There might be OS X and Windows applications that come
with an EQ by default for every added channel. Do you think each time
you add
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Apropos wasting resources. A lot of Linux audio applications don't
have EQs by default for the channels of a mixer, we need to add 20
LADSPA EQs to 20 channels. There might be OS X and Windows
applications that come with an EQ by default for every added channel.
Do you
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 11:30:33AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Apropos wasting resources. A lot of Linux audio applications don't have
EQs by default for the channels of a mixer, we need to add 20 LADSPA EQs
to 20 channels. There might be OS X and Windows
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On 08/08/2009 08:10 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Apropos wasting resources. A lot of Linux audio applications don't
have EQs by default for the channels of a mixer, we need to add 20
LADSPA EQs to 20 channels. There might be OS X and Windows
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
It's not very smart to compare different OSs and applications, I'm sorry
that I tend to do this. It would be better to describe some approaches
and to describe the good and bad experiences just for Linux applications.
Yes.
This is the correct way to approach
Raymond Martin wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2009 20:53:05 Thomas Vecchione wrote:
Once again forgot to hit Reply-All.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:
I'm not interested to take sides, I only want to learn about the GPL.
Assumed
There is a reason. A scumbag company forced trademark issues to the front
even though they were doing FOSS. Trademarks in FOSS are just as bad as
software patents. Too bad most people do not get that.
Okay, maybe for names and logos used by FLOSS, the creative commons
should be forced as an
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
There is a reason. A scumbag company forced trademark issues to the
front
even though they were doing FOSS. Trademarks in FOSS are just as bad as
software patents. Too bad most people do not get that.
Okay, maybe for names and logos used by FLOSS, the creative commons
Something funny about confusing names. For my needs jconv can be a very
good audio application and a very useless Japanese code conversion.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Do you think a trademark is void if the thing differs by being forked
and proprietary?
Calling a gratis Cola Coca~Cola is allowed?
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Raymond Martin wrote:
That's nice, but I would like for someone to show me how this pertains to the
current line of discussion. The fact is that code does become GPL once you
mix it with other GPL code.
Hi Raymond :)
I searched the web and discussed this also off-list.
Today in the early
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:14:23AM -0400, Raymond Martin wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2009 08:56:30 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Which makes perfect sense. In a civilised society even
a convicted thief retains all the rights to his legally
acquired property. If
There are cases in the US, for instance, where people growing marijuana
for their medical conditions have had their homes seized and never returned.
No justice there. That's real police stuff.
Sometimes western civilization behaves like the Third Reich did, but for
FLOSS I never read or
Raymond Martin wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2009 09:51:05 you wrote:
On 7 Aug 2009, at 12:55, Raymond Martin wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2009 06:51:08 Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Ralf Mardorfralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
For emphasis, I just want to
Thomas Vecchione wrote:
Forgot to send to the list.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Thomas Vecchione seabla...@gmail.com
mailto:seabla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Raymond Martin lase...@gmail.com
mailto:lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all. There
Thomas Vecchione wrote:
Once again forgot to hit Reply-All.
It's weekend :D.
You are confusing Copyright and Trademark Law. Copyright law says that yes
they can fork the project.
Trademark Law however says that Miss B. is allowed to follow up legally to
prevent a trademark, which can
Arnold Krille wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 00:41:23 Esben Stien wrote:
Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net writes:
Rack mount is preferred but not essential.
What are you talking about..!?!?. Of course, it's essential;).
Some metal brackets and some screws will
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
David Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:53 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
From TFA:
--8--
Go to System-Preferences-Sound, click on the Devices tab, and check
out the pulldown menu next to ‘Sound Events’ at the
Paul Davis wrote:
2009/8/5 Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com:
Linux audio is a total mess... a normal human being can't work with pro
audio on Linux, unless he/she spent hours and hours to learn the little
tricks or he has an expert available who helps him...
What is
Malte Steiner wrote:
People are moaning about Linux Audio for a while but should look at the
other systems, pro audio simply doesnt work on any (operating) system
without some involvement. Hard- and software are now very complex
systems and with all these small problems, its still not
drew Roberts wrote:
On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:41:57 Arnold Krille wrote:
Standard contracts for employees include that the copyrights of their
productive work during company time is property of the company. And that
includes software...
Arnold
OK, but what about the copyrights
hermann wrote:
Hi
Yes, I don't understand why people mean linux audio is a mess, last
day's I have setup a new box with debian/sid and it took me a half day
to get a full featured rt audio/midi environment on the run. It's like
always in life, if you wont to use a tool, you must know how it
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
It seems to me that this attitude comes from a limited understanding
of how the open source community works.
It differs to other open source communities, I agree and this might be a
problem for me, I agree. But I don't agree that most machines can be set
up to be fine
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
It seems to me that this attitude comes from a limited understanding
of how the open source community works.
It differs to other open source communities, I agree and this might be a
problem for me, I agree. But I don't agree that most
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Many people use Linux Audio tools and infrastructure for professional
use everyday.
Yes, less than 1% of all users are using Linux and this are many people,
because for audio there are more less people than for general usage.
And more than 99% people are less than less
Malte Steiner wrote:
This is a wrong, you can be happy to have a basic windows system running
in a half hour without drivers and the important security bullshit
First: I'm not using Windows.
People who do use Windows just take one of those illegal Windows All In
One media, push a button and
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 13:22 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Pardon, my English is broken.
Which reminds me:
* What is your favourite programming language?
Assembler for different processors.
* What kind of Linux Audio project are you currently spending
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On 08/06/2009 11:24 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Btw. Patrick, please run ntpdate or sntp, it's hard to puzzle your
replies into the right order.
Gnome issue with time setting...
Thanks for pointing it out.
Phew ;) so you don't get me wrong :).
Now I should write
Hi Alex :)
I'll take the next bus and will reply to this mail only because of the
68000 issue.
alex stone wrote:
[snip]
I owned several variations of boxes including
an Amiga (best midi timing on the planet), and my much cherished but
now dead Fairlight.
I started with the C64 and then
Raymond Martin wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 09:59:39 Chris Cannam wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:23 PM, drew Robertsz...@100jamz.com wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 03:51:30 you wrote:
The second question becomes broadly irrelevant here if we are
prepared to accept
entrance examination? :)
I subscribed to the list, because I needed some information when I tried
to program for Linux audio. I guess you want people to learn how to
program for Linux audio. What you're looking for is an attitude test,
not a test about programming knowledge. I've got
Raymond Martin wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 13:06:01 drew Roberts wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:05:17 Raymond Martin wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 08:59:31 drew Roberts wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 21:26:19 Raymond Martin wrote:
This was all in the context
Chris Cannam wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Raymond Martinlase...@gmail.com wrote:
What possible counter-argument can there be left?
http://lwn.net/Articles/61292/ (same guy you just cited, explaining
why you're wrong)
Chris
The claim that a GPL violation could lead to
What we're looking for is less completely irrelevant noise like this.
Particularly in response to jokes (blatant smileys and all).
Honestly...
There's a difference between scorn and joke.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
[snip]
all this means that if somebody uses GPL'd code without releasing under
GPL him/herself, s/he is in breach of contract with the original
author(s). it *does* *not* *mean* that you can now assume the entire
package is up for grabs under the terms of the GPL.
Paul Davis wrote:
2009/8/6 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
[snip]
all this means that if somebody uses GPL'd code without releasing under
GPL him/herself, s/he is in breach of contract with the original
author(s). it *does* *not* *mean* that you
PS:
Paul Davis wrote:
2009/8/6 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
[snip]
all this means that if somebody uses GPL'd code without releasing
under
GPL him/herself, s/he is in breach of contract with the original
author(s). it *does* *not* *mean
drew Roberts wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 20:34:37 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
because of a similar copyright law
that someone from the list described and it seems to be the same for the
USA and nearly every country,
If I understood what I have read in the past correctly and am
victor wrote:
I note, interestingly, that even though in Linux circles (at LAC for
instance), people keep mentioning MS Windows as a rival OS,
for us it's really Apple and OSX that constitutes competition these
days from the proprietary side of things.
A lot of professional studios
Steve Harris wrote:
On 5 Aug 2009, at 10:57, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
victor wrote:
I note, interestingly, that even though in Linux circles (at LAC for
instance), people keep mentioning MS Windows as a rival OS,
for us it's really Apple and OSX that constitutes competition these
days from
Florian Schirmer wrote:
For OSX the top three are Logic, Live and ProTools. For Windows the
top two are Cubase and Live. Overall there are more OSX than Windows
users, since the switch to Intel based OSX systems the gap is steadily
increasing. Again this depends on which user group and
Ray Rashif wrote:
Woohoo..I'm safe. Saffire Pro 10 working well.
FireWire (IEEE 1394): Ricoh Co Ltd R5C832 IEEE 1394 Controller
Good news :). Dunno, but maybe BIOS versions and other issues might have
an effect to this. If so, this might be interesting for
David Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 20:49 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
Actually the most free software development happens in a Do-cracy: The one
who
does the job (or the biggest part of it) gets to decide.
and the rest complain on mailing lists :)
Please try to
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
No, Steinburg wouldn't be held to the GPL... your user would.
How can a user comply with the GPL or violate the GPL? A user is just
using applications.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Arnold Krille wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 21:23:20 Sampo Savolainen wrote:
I can modify a piece of GPL'd code to my hearts content, link it to my
proprietary code, use it for years, all without violating the GPL. A
violation would be if I distribute the combination as
alex stone wrote:
Call me cynical, and the plugin authors certainly have the last say,
but there seems to be a rather large dose of hypocrisy going on
here
In the last days we simply became wiser. Learning isn't Pecksniffery.
___
keller wrote:
The students leave and usually cease their contributions after the
money runs out.
Hi Bob :)
IIUC the students get paid? This is seldom for coders that program
FLOSS. Unusual approaches by doing FLOSS and the way of how things work
on faculties as a rule, let me have a
Robert Keller wrote:
On Aug 1, 2009, at 4:04 PM, nescivi wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2009 13:36:20 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2009 11:32:24 nescivi wrote:
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 00:49:09 David Robillard wrote:
[snip]
On another related
PS:
Even if you changed headers
original done by other authors for more than 50% of the code, it must be
noticeable who was the original author and that you changed it. There's
a stipulation: a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent
notices stating that you changed the
Robert Keller wrote:
[snip] the code has been through thousands of versions and multiple
repositories.
If you take care to name the original authors and the authors who did
modifications and the dates of the modifications, it also will help you
always to know exactly how you build your own
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
DISCLAIMER
I don't want to discuss the merits of any particular
case. If I refer to Prof. Keller it is only by way of
example, and not to suggest he should justify himself
on this list. Of course I'm still interested in his
views on these matters.
END DISCLAIMER
Arnout Engelen wrote:
I'm not quite sure whether I understand you correctly, but it seems you're
not entirely right here.
If you don't have the copyright to a piece of code you wrote, for example
because you wrote it for your employer, then this means you are *not allowed*
to distribute this
Dave Phillips wrote:
Greetings,
Just out of curiosity, how many participants in this discussion are
copyright holders ? How many of you have published works under copyright ?
Best,
dp
I programmed free software without using any code of other people, in
Germany I automatically have the
Arnold Krille wrote:
If you didn't sign a contract and work on a project, the
copyright is still yours
Are you sure? I guess (and I'm not sure) that if you did some kind of
work, e.g. being a developer for a company, it implies that the employer
will take on the copyright and that you aren't
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 02:20:15PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
As I have written before, less college tuitions are similar to being paid.
Absolutely not.
If you run a business and I am your customer I am in no
way bound by any deals you make with suppliers
Arnout Engelen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 02:20:15PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Arnout Engelen wrote:
If you don't have the copyright to a piece of code you wrote, for example
because you wrote it for your employer, then this means you are *not
allowed*
to distribute this code
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On 08/02/2009 08:14 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Arnold Krille wrote:
If you didn't sign a contract and work on a project, the
copyright is still yours
Are you sure? I guess (and I'm not sure) that if you did some kind of
work, e.g. being a developer
Arnout Engelen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 08:25:19AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
Just out of curiosity, how many participants in this discussion are
copyright holders ? How many of you have published works under copyright ?
At least in the Netherlands (and i believe this goes
Arnold Krille wrote:
On Sunday 02 August 2009 18:22:56 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On 08/02/2009 08:14 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Arnold Krille wrote:
If you didn't sign a contract and work on a project, the
copyright is still yours
Are you sure? I guess (and I'm not sure
David Robillard wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Dunno what's called trademark and what's called copyright
Then you probably shouldn't be attempting to discuss copyright law
-dr
As I've written, a logo in Germany can be a trademark, but you need
Forest Bond wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 10:18:20AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Even if you changed headers original done by other authors for more
than 50% of the code, it must be noticeable who was the original author
and that you changed it. There's a stipulation: a) You must
Arnold Krille wrote:
On Sunday 02 August 2009 15:40:33 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On the other hand, if a company pays you a regular salary and the job is
named developer, it might include that a copyright will subrogate to
the employer, even if there isn't any stipulation saying this. Here I'm
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 01:12:48PM -0700, keller wrote:
If anyone has a recommendation for a substitute for install4j, I'd
appreciate hearing about it.
There's Raymond's post claiming that this tool is actually
freely available - I don't know.
On sourceforge
jaromil wrote:
re all,
the GNU GPL agile copyright registration aimed at freedom helps us
little fishes survive despite the marauding giants - institutions,
corporations, etc. as in a student - university relationship can be.
a common situation of attribution of authorship in
Sometimes, the process of installation is not facilitated by scripts,
but by some other means (such as executable programs). The GPL text only
mentions the word scripts. But when reading and interpreting the
license, it is clearly understood that the license doesn't specifically
only mean
The question here is: Which ones are the broken ones and which ones the
good ones?
I wouldn't know where to look for that info, do you?
I would never trust any list for hardware that should be fine with
Linux, ensures there will be some revision that isn't fine. I guess you
need to
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
hi everybody!
just a passing remark: it is very easy to filter out a troll. it is
however close to impossible to filter responses to trolling by people
whose mail i appreciate in general.
best,
jörn
Okay, a last not to the list, to avoid that somebody else
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
You should be able to empathize Bob's emotions, if not you are just
(a) liar(s)!
Oops, Raymonds emotions :D ...
okay, Bob's too, but I was talking about Raymond's undertsandable emotions.
Sorry.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure the majority of these people, as well as a large portion
of the general population, are easily manipulated by narcissists.
I became what psychology is defame as a borderline personality, because
I need to survive my childhood living with malignant
Okay, hopefully this will be my last mail :(. You are wrong.
David Robillard wrote:
P.S. The commentators and peanut gallery really do not help either ;)
Bob Keller subscribed to the list because of what you call The
commentators and peanut gallery, please read the whole thread.
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Eckert wrote:
I'm currently playing with some code that sends SysEx data to ALSA using
RtMidi¹. I get an error reported by the latter one as soon as the
size of the
message exceeds 16355 bytes. Unfortunately, I
Hi Raymond :) hi list :)
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 11:12:05 Robert Keller wrote:
Ralf,
I think you have a misimpression, created by laseray (aka biophotoray
aka Raymond Martin), who apparently is trying to steal control of my
project, known as Impro-Visor.
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 12:16:17 you wrote:
Hi Raymond :) hi list :)
My recommendation is, that Bob forge the project within the next 3
month, that he will be the head of the project, but coders from the
community get access to the source directories, after they
. Am
I wrong?
Cheers,
Ralf
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi Bob :)
Robert Keller wrote:
However, I don't feel that I
am obligated to accept every suggestion that someone makes about
software that is my own.
You used GPL
Robert Keller wrote:
I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
visor/ for Impro-Visor, which is its correct name. I will populate the
source later today, as I need time to get acquainted with their
system, but I have to be off right now to another important
This is not against Fons, but I wonder that there's no understanding for
passion by several people. Sending this private massage is also adding
fuel to the fire. I guess Fons, there are a lot of mails in several
lists where you in a more distinguished kind said something similar. Are
the words
Dave Phillips wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 19 July 2009, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
If anybody is interested, I have decompiled the latest Impro-visor version,
which has only been provide as a binary (in contradiction to the terms of
the GPL). So if you want the source
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted to cooperate with people, but it was just too difficult for them to
admit being wrong.
Hardened fronts needs to calm down and then to find a way out the tight
corner. Everybody needs a chance, otherwise he might do everything
without publishing anything and
also fine if the source will kept closed. Please excuse my broken
English and my frankness.
Regards,
Ralf Mardorf
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Pardon Raymond :)
only now I visited http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~keller/jazz/improvisor/. This
looks like nice but not very interesting software
Arnout Engelen wrote:
How do you like it?
IMHO both layouts are fine :). Ralf
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
I haven't counted them, but I see practically the same thing at work where I
use Ubuntu 9.04.
For Ubuntu Hardy (64 Studio 3.0-beta3) exact 62 from around 170 threads
are /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon at the moment on my system. Around 170
threads, because I have
Renato Budinich wrote:
Thank you very much, this is interesting, I'll have a look into RtMidi
and your program. Being that the little I know is C, is it much more
difficult outputting notes using the alsa api?
Since there is a driver for it, you should be able to use it as an
alsa midi
I wrote:
Subject: Re: [LAD] help on creating MIDI from linux input events
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:11:35 +0200
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: Renato Budinich
CC: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Renato Budinich wrote:
Thank you very much, this is interesting, I'll
Renato Budinich wrote:
I'm not a Linux, neither a C/C++ coder, but the answer here is very
simple, if the MIDI events (I guess this is what you mean by keyboard
events)
nope sorry, i meant EV_KEY events as in linux/input.h - they are
certainly not MIDI events.
OT a very stupid
I asked:
Renato Budinich wrote:
I'm not a Linux, neither a C/C++ coder, but the answer here is very
simple, if the MIDI events (I guess this is what you mean by keyboard
events)
nope sorry, i meant EV_KEY events as in linux/input.h - they are
certainly not MIDI events.
Miguel Morales wrote:
Hmm, so you're saying that the device sends keyboard events. How did
you find out which kind of data it sends out?
Sending out midi note events is easy with RTMidi, check out the
section on midi out section. It contains a section on MIDI note output.
I don't have
Renato Budinich wrote:
It might be an overkill, but something like this is very easily done with
SuperCollider (or Chuck or Pd for that matter).
hey, i have just started using sc! I'll ask on the sc list for some
code. Thank you!
In the meanwhile i found pyrtmidi - python bindings for
Jeff McClintock wrote:
On Windows XP, many people run as administrator
Definitive!
I don't know about LADSPA..but the latest Cubase uses C:\Program
Files\Common Files\Steinberg\VST2 for 3rd party plugins.
On my machine it's '/media/disk/Programme/Steinberg/VstPlugins', resp.
801 - 900 of 960 matches
Mail list logo
