Arnold Krille wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 00:41:23 Esben Stien wrote:
Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net writes:
Rack mount is preferred but not essential.
What are you talking about..!?!?. Of course, it's essential;).
Some metal brackets and some screws will
On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:58:30 you wrote:
Arnold Krille wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 00:41:23 Esben Stien wrote:
Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net writes:
Rack mount is preferred but not essential.
What are you talking about..!?!?. Of course, it's essential;).
Some metal
On Thursday 06 August 2009 05:33:58 Arnold Krille wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:58:30 you wrote:
Arnold Krille wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 00:41:23 Esben Stien wrote:
Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net writes:
Rack mount is preferred but not essential.
What are you
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:52 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
What would you recommend to look at ?
For a four-way, I would - because of cache issues and bandwidth
considerations - recommend NOT to look at Core2.
Nehalem looks like the platform of choice at this point in time.
/j
TIA,
On 8/5/09, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:39 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Hi,
I have been using an asus board with intel core quad cpu q6600 for about
a year now with no hassles.
Ditto. Same CPU on a Asus P5E-VM HDMI
-dr
Ditto,
Q6600 on recent high
Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net writes:
I'm looking for a high performance (e.g. quad core) machine to be used
for audio processing (and running Linux of course).
There's six cores available now, btw.
For serious boards, there's really only Tyan and iWill. There's also
supermicro in that
Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@folkwang-hochschule.de writes:
if noise is not a problem, no problem. if it is, check the silent boxes
from thomas-krenn.com
If noise or dust is a problem, which of course, it is, you'd go for
water cooling.
On Thursday 06 August 2009 00:41:23 Esben Stien wrote:
Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net writes:
Rack mount is preferred but not essential.
What are you talking about..!?!?. Of course, it's essential;).
Some metal brackets and some screws will do nicely. No need to pay some
vendors
Hello all,
I'm looking for a high performance (e.g. quad core)
machine to be used for audio processing (and running
Linux of course). Rack mount is preferred but not
essential.
What would you recommend to look at ?
TIA,
--
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking for a high performance (e.g. quad core)
machine to be used for audio processing (and running
Linux of course). Rack mount is preferred but not
essential.
What would you recommend to look at ?
if noise is not a problem, no problem. if it is,
Hi,
I have been using an asus board with intel core quad cpu q6600 for about
a year now with no hassles.
Does have a fairly noisy fan but I haven't actually looked into
replacing it with a quieter system.
I have found asus boards to be very compatible with Linux and especially
my audio needs
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 17:52:23 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking for a high performance (e.g. quad core)
machine to be used for audio processing (and running
Linux of course). Rack mount is preferred but not
essential.
What would you recommend to look at ?
I had been
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:39 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Hi,
I have been using an asus board with intel core quad cpu q6600 for about
a year now with no hassles.
Ditto. Same CPU on a Asus P5E-VM HDMI
-dr
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo