On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Raymond Martin lase...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I think everyone can appreciate is when there is an issue
concerning licensing that the responsible party does not turn around
on another list/group and make it sound like the open source people
are bad guys
On Monday 03 August 2009 08:12:24 you wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Raymond Martin lase...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest that Raymond keep picking the GPL issues of Impro-Visor, till
everything is fixed. I'm not saying that Raymond should join now or that he
can't have his fork, but I
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Raymond Martin lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 03 August 2009 08:12:24 you wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Raymond Martin lase...@gmail.com
wrote:
I suggest that Raymond keep picking the GPL issues of Impro-Visor, till
everything is fixed. I'm
Ralf,
I think you have a misimpression, created by laseray (aka biophotoray
aka Raymond Martin), who apparently is trying to steal control of my
project, known as Impro-Visor.
I do want to cooperate, and will be looking into what I can do to
repair the damage he is causing. However, I need
On Monday 27 July 2009 11:12:05 Robert Keller wrote:
Ralf,
I think you have a misimpression, created by laseray (aka biophotoray
aka Raymond Martin), who apparently is trying to steal control of my
project, known as Impro-Visor.
Calling what I am doing stealing is defamation of character. I
Hi Raymond :) hi list :)
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 11:12:05 Robert Keller wrote:
Ralf,
I think you have a misimpression, created by laseray (aka biophotoray
aka Raymond Martin), who apparently is trying to steal control of my
project, known as Impro-Visor.
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
My recommendation is, that Bob forge the project within the next 3
month, that he will be the head of the project, but coders from the
community get access to the source directories, after they have shown by
some patches, that they are able to program, or what ever the
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 12:16:17 you wrote:
Hi Raymond :) hi list :)
My recommendation is, that Bob forge the project within the next 3
month, that he will be the head of the project, but coders from the
community get access to the source directories, after they
hi bob!
welcome to the linux audio developers' community, thanks for joining
this list.
i'm sorry that you are joining for rather unfortunate reasons, but
licensing issues are always controversial and have a way of attracting
hot-heads... so please don't be offended. i'll try to refrain from
On Monday 27 July 2009 14:33:30 Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
hi bob!
which means that raymond has a point. and he is also entitled to forking
your project any way he sees fit. so much for the legal part.
as to communication skills, raymond, i think you should go get a nice
cup of coffee, tone
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 14:33:30 Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
as to communication skills, raymond, i think you should go get a nice
cup of coffee, tone down a bit, see what happens. this bears all the
hallmarks of a excuse my french pissing contest, which might be
2009/7/27 Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@folkwang-hochschule.de:
which means that raymond has a point. and he is also entitled to forking
your project any way he sees fit.
It isn't necessarily the case that he is entitled to fork it. Raymond
has repeatedly said that it was distributed to him
On Monday 27 July 2009 16:02:47 Chris Cannam wrote:
2009/7/27 Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@folkwang-hochschule.de:
which means that raymond has a point. and he is also entitled to forking
your project any way he sees fit.
It isn't necessarily the case that he is entitled to fork it. Raymond
Dear Mr. Keller,
you gave your average interesting project a bad note by keeping the
source code closed. Why not open the source? Cross-fertilisation can
make it much more interesting, everybody could benefit from it and
you'll get deserved fame, even if it's shared fame. Just my 2 Cents. I'm
14 matches
Mail list logo
