On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:57 AM, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 03:19 -0400, Jeremy Salwen wrote:
My concept with GMPI (not everyone agreed) was that MIDI was
not required
*in* the plugin.
[...]
This is almost exactly what I
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 05:38 -0400, Jeremy Salwen wrote:
[...]
You emphasized the current state of lilv, saying Lilv doesn't really
do anything like this related to run time, and didn't speak further
on the possibilities. To me, this statement coupled with the further
silence on the topic
My concept with GMPI (not everyone agreed) was that MIDI was not required
*in* the plugin.
For example take your MIDI keyboard's Modulation Wheel. Imagine the
function that parses the MIDI bytes, decides what type of MIDI message it
is
and typically converts that 7-bit controller to a
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 03:19 -0400, Jeremy Salwen wrote:
My concept with GMPI (not everyone agreed) was that MIDI was
not required
*in* the plugin.
[...]
This is almost exactly what I proposed as an LV2 extension in this
previous thread:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 20:26 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 00:43 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
[...]
I'm a bit concerned about your stance towards portability of LV2.
[...]
I have heard nothing about this situation. However my implementation,
lilv[1] (along with its
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 10:10 +1200, Jeff McClintock wrote:
I think you are in error considering these things mutually exclusive.
Yes, hosts dealing with MIDI binding is how things should be done, but
crippling a plugin API to not be able to handle MIDI is just that:
crippling. Maybe I want
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 10:59 +1200, Jeff McClintock wrote:
I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a
comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html
For historical interest. I did complete the GMPI prototype.
Now running on Windows (GUI + DSP
For historical interest. I did complete the GMPI prototype.
I don't suppose the code for those modular synthesis plugins is
available? :)
I release as many as possible open source. Unfortunately before I used
plugins I coded everything as part of my application, so a most of the good
On 07/31/2012 10:13 PM, David Robillard wrote:
I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a
comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html
Great job!
Besides dynamic ports, most interesting to me seems to be the
Instruments section,
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:45 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On 07/31/2012 10:13 PM, David Robillard wrote:
I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a
comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html
Great job!
Besides dynamic ports, most interesting
I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a
comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html
For historical interest. I did complete the GMPI prototype.
Now running on Windows (GUI + DSP support) and Mac/Linux (DSP support). We
have over 1000 plugins
I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a
comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html
A couple of nonsense baroque ideas aside, most of the requirements are
met, though there are still important gaps. I mention it here in case
anyone has an
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:13 AM, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net wrote:
I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a
comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html
Excuse my curiosity, but whose government's permit to dig on the site
of GMPI did you
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 00:43 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:13 AM, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net wrote:
I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a
comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html
Excuse my curiosity,
14 matches
Mail list logo
