Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-28 Thread delire
- Original Message - From: "Paul Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 29 July 2001 5:50 Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name > > I still like "JACK", "API" and "LAAGA". "ALBA" is not bad but I agree > that its a bit to close to ALSA for comfortable di

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-28 Thread Iain Sandoe
> I still like "JACK", "API" and "LAAGA". "ALBA" is not bad but I agree > that its a bit to close to ALSA for comfortable distinction between > the two (should that be necessary). drinking LAAGA until ALBA makes JACK 'API ... eh? my vote is for "Jack". Iain.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-28 Thread Joshua Haberman
* Paul Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >I think it's a better idea to include configure in CVS. Some macros only > >exist in certain versions of autoconf, and other variables may enter into > >play that make building it on the fly problematic. > > Thats precisely why I don't think it should b

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-28 Thread Joshua Haberman
* To [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Paul Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > First, you need to generate the autoconf scripts and Makefiles, since > > these are not stored in CVS: > > > > cd $AD/quasimodo/libs > > sh autogen.sh > > --

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-28 Thread Paul Davis
>Reasonable people differ here. For example, the autoconf authors >(http://subversions.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/autoconf/). One of the simplest and least-dependent configure.in files you'll find :) >I think it's a better idea to include configure in CVS. Some macros only >exist in certain versions

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-28 Thread Joshua Haberman
* Paul Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > First, you need to generate the autoconf scripts and Makefiles, since > these are not stored in CVS: > > cd $AD/quasimodo/libs > sh autogen.sh > -- > > This is standard CVS p

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-28 Thread Paul Davis
The ardour-dev list would really be the right place for this, but since its been raised here ... [ ... Adam's problems trying to build ardour ] >1. sourceforge CVS page never says which module (ardour) to download >Seems obvious, but without it ever being mentioned on the page... I'll fix that.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-28 Thread Paul Davis
>How about this one: >PAUL - Paul's Audio Universal Linker. >Incorporate's the name of the inventor and is (sort of) recursive. I'm not the inventor. LAAGA represents the accumulation of 2 years of LAD discussions, with strong input from Kai, David Olofson, Benno, Richard Furse, Abramo and many

Re: Re[4]: [linux-audio-dev] modifiers was - what's wrong with glame

2001-07-28 Thread n++k
[Rick Burnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] | | The problem is getting to that point. I just don't want to put the | effort into emacs since vim does what I need better. Not saying that | the whole 'vi' interface was any easier. [...] | Having remappable keys is part of the issue, the second part is a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-28 Thread Adam Zygmunt
I realize that this particular topic has pretty well driven into the ground the other day, and I don't want this to be seen as part of a Paul Davis bashing session, but I thought what I'd do is document what problems and annoyances I ran into in yet another unsuccessful attempt to compile Ardour.

Re[4]: [linux-audio-dev] modifiers was - what's wrong with glame

2001-07-28 Thread Rick Burnett
The problem is getting to that point. I just don't want to put the effort into emacs since vim does what I need better. Not saying that the whole 'vi' interface was any easier. I know people who use emacs and are incredible with it. I think you missed part of my point. Having remappable keys i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-28 Thread delire
- Original Message - From: "David G Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, 28 July 2001 11:09 Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name > How about this one: > PAUL - Paul's Audio Universal Linker. > Incorporate's the name of the inventor and is (sort of)

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-28 Thread delire
> > My suggestion: > > > > LAD - Linux Audio Developers > > SPA - Simple Plugin Api > > LAP - Linux Audio Patchbay > > LADIES - Linux Audio Developers Intuitive Editing Suite hmmm lads and lap dancing ladies...what are we doing again? ahh that's right LAAGAlager oh god, it's doomed de|

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-28 Thread David G Matthews
How about this one: PAUL - Paul's Audio Universal Linker. Incorporate's the name of the inventor and is (sort of) recursive. On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > My suggestion: > > LAD - Linux Audio Developers > SPA - Simple Plugin Api > LAP - Linux Audio Patchbay > LADIES - Linux Au

Re: [linux-audio-dev] modifiers was - what's wrong with glame

2001-07-28 Thread Richard Dobson
Out of interest, what is the minimum or standard keyboard spec assumed by Linux these days? I have twelve F-keys on my standard PC keyboard, which with the usual Alt/Ctrl modifiers, gives me 34 command options (F1 always reserved for Help). VC++ uses these a lot, mirroring primary menu commands, a

[linux-audio-dev] linux-kernel info: 2.4 Performance bug in read ahead

2001-07-28 Thread Roger Larsson
Hi, I have for some time wondered why reading two big (and identical) files simultaneously (diff) takes the double time of reading them sequentially... today I found the cause :-) Linux limits the read ahead to 1+31 pages (รก 4096 bytes = 128 kB) with modern HD this is read quickly (4.3 ms, with

Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] modifiers was - what's wrong with glame

2001-07-28 Thread n++k
[Rick Burnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] | I like the idea of completely remapable hot-keys. My example because [...] | I also disagree that great effort should have to be put into using the | UI, thats why I refuse to use emacs and framemaker period, they are the funny part being that emacs featur

Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] modifiers was - what's wrong with glame

2001-07-28 Thread Rick Burnett
I like the idea of completely remapable hot-keys. My example because of a lack of any better would be quake/unreal/tribes, all of which have remapable keys. If you ever watch people who play these games (as I do) you will see an incredible amount of diversity in keystrokes. I watch some people