Re: [linux-audio-dev] W64 file format

2001-10-24 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
It really blew my mind when Juhana Sadeharju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >From:Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >I am currently adding support for Sonic Foundry's 64 bit wave files to > >libsndfile: > [ ... ] > >I currently have one example of this file format and I need mor

Re: [linux-audio-dev] W64 file format

2001-10-24 Thread Juhana Sadeharju
>From: Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I am currently adding support for Sonic Foundry's 64 bit wave files to >libsndfile: [ ... ] >I currently have one example of this file format and I need more. Could you or anybody else just install a demo version and generate the test files? (My

Re: [linux-audio-dev] W64 file format

2001-10-24 Thread ljp
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 02:08 am, you wrote: [snip] IEEE float was only available in the format provided 48_32bit_stereo http://llornkcor.com/w64/w64.html My ftp site is having problems, so http is it. If you need any more, or need bigger files, or have questions, email me. My favorite (a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] alsa latency statistics

2001-10-24 Thread Josh Green
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:15, Roger Larsson wrote: > On Wednesday 24 October 2001 03:54, dave willis wrote: > > - - - > > latencytest was ran as follows: > > ./latencytest -t alsa -d hw -q none 3 256 > > ./latencytest -t oss -q none 3 256 > > Question is, what did you do while this did run? > * Co

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ecamegapedal catches up

2001-10-24 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > PS Reasons for using standard ecasound syntax instead of xml in >the preset files are a) consistency (-> man ecasound(1)), and >b) to avoid dependency to a xml-parser library (main ecasound >only requires libc and libstdc++). Kai, I shoul

Re: [linux-audio-dev] alsa latency statistics

2001-10-24 Thread Roger Larsson
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 03:54, dave willis wrote: > - - - > latencytest was ran as follows: > ./latencytest -t alsa -d hw -q none 3 256 > ./latencytest -t oss -q none 3 256 Question is, what did you do while this did run? * Compile the kernel? * run x11perf? There are lots of testcases inclu

Re: [linux-audio-dev] W64 file format

2001-10-24 Thread Bill Schottstaedt
> If anybody wishes to help this Free Software project by supplying examples files > I would be very pleased to hear from them. Me too, if possible. There's a tarball of many of my test sound files: sf.tar.gz at ccrma-ftp.

[linux-audio-dev] [ADMIN][Fwd: BOUNCE linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu: Admin request of type /\buns\w*b/i at line 3]

2001-10-24 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
this mail from frank barknecht got eaten by majordomo's braindead administration command filter. sorry for the hassle. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > STEFFL, ERIK *Internet* (SBCSI) hat gesagt: // STEFFL, ERIK *Internet* (SBCSI) wrote: > > > on a debian unstable: > > > > jojda:~>locate sstream