Erik Walthinsen wrote:
>
> computer via firewire. This alone makes it pointless to do processing in
> the I/O box.
I think it should be only remote controlled system where actual data flow
doesn't go through the host computer.
Modular system with it's own bus. Something like VME & RACEway.
The
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> It would be nice to be able to use a chip that isn't single-source,
> though -- like a 7400 in the TTL world. You could argue that a 7400
> isn't open in the sense of open-source code, but its specs are
> completely open and there are myriad vendors.
I don't think there
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:42:02 -, Richard W.E. Furse wrote:
> Okay, I'll try to find time to sort this one out. Do you need it right now,
> or can I leave it for a bit? I'd prefer to do it very slightly differently
> (I'd prefer not to use so many bits plus ideally I'd also like to be able t
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > This is pretty much the design I'm working on, except using a simple
> > microcontroller, not a DSP. What would the DSPs by used for for this
> > device?
>
> To run custom effects! Reverb, EQ, Vocoder, Flanger ... - whatever.
I'm still trying to figure o
Rene Rebe writes:
> >
> > It would be nice to be able to use a chip that isn't single-source,
> > though -- like a 7400 in the TTL world. You could argue that a 7400
> > isn't open in the sense of open-source code, but its specs are
> > completely open and there are myriad vendors.
>
> E
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Steve Harris wrote:
> Late last year there was some discussion about LADSPA 1.1, the defaults
> issue still needs resolving, so can we agree on it?
>
> Paul's suggested addition to handle defaults looks like:
>
> -
Okay, I'll try to find time to sort this one out. Do you need it right now,
or can I leave it for a bit? I'd prefer to do it very slightly differently
(I'd prefer not to use so many bits plus ideally I'd also like to be able to
specify default values).
--Richard
> -Original Message-
> Fr
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Frank Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Paul's suggested addition to handle defaults looks like:
>
> [..]
>
> Just one small nitpicker here:
>
> > #define LADSPA_HINT_DEFAULT_MID0x200 /* set to min+(max-min/2) */
>
> Make that "/* set to
From: Joe Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] open-source like hardware
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:27:03 -0700
> Jussi Laako writes:
> > Paul Davis wrote:
> > >
> > > the chip design is not open source. its a proprietary device,
> > > manufactured in industrial quantit
Jussi Laako writes:
> Paul Davis wrote:
> >
> > the chip design is not open source. its a proprietary device,
> > manufactured in industrial quantities. i don't see it as at all
> > similar to the ideas discussed in this thread.
>
> It's just an interface chip. As FPGA or DSP processor di
> -Original Message-
> From: Joachim Backhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I'm living in germany / europe does that mean
> that I can ignore the US patents since we
> have a different patent system???
> (I think it's not going that way)
>
> Fuck software patents.
>
> Regards
> Joachi
"John S. Rhoades" wrote:
>
> systems, why not just use the host CPU? With dual Athlons and low
> latency patches, you have a huge number of CPU cycles per sample
Because it doesn't have enough power. Think about few biggest Creamware
Pulsars running in dual Athlon system.
> available at the dr
Paul Davis wrote:
>
> the chip design is not open source. its a proprietary device,
> manufactured in industrial quantities. i don't see it as at all
> similar to the ideas discussed in this thread.
It's just an interface chip. As FPGA or DSP processor discussed here. Nobody
was planning to make
Paul Davis wrote:
>
> there are good reasons why certain kinds of devices don't exist. the
> most common is that hardly anyone wants them. the fact that you and a
> few other people want them *a lot* doesn't do anything to balance the
> fact that very few people want them at all. companies that m
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Paul's suggested addition to handle defaults looks like:
[..]
Just one small nitpicker here:
> #define LADSPA_HINT_DEFAULT_MID0x200 /* set to min+(max-min/2) */
Make that "/* set to min+((max-min)/2) */" :-).
SCNR,
Frank
>Or pyqt? (I know Paul loves KDE so much 8-)
heh. i love it as much as i love GNOME :)
--p
Late last year there was some discussion about LADSPA 1.1, the defaults
issue still needs resolving, so can we agree on it?
Paul's suggested addition to handle defaults looks like:
--
/* Hint LADSPA_HINT_DEFAULT_* indicates that
I've hacked together a low(-ish) latency convolver for LADSPA. The are
some unusual design decisions that I'm not sure how to resolve though.
It currently runs a 3ms latency, which is good for a convolver, but lousy
comapred to a filter.
I can cut this down to 0 or 1.5ms (depending on the host's
Paul Davis wrote:
> >I would like to code up a proto of the interface though. I was
> >planning on trying to do it with python and something like wxPython.
> >Mostly because Python is my new favorite language and I need a good
> >graphics project to work on.
>
> any chance you'd consider using p
>> there are 2 excellent books on GTK+ programming (both
>> online), and an almost complete API reference manual online.
>
>Where can I find them?
>thanks
API Reference:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/api-toc.html
Havoc Pennington's book:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/GGAD/ggad.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Thats actually a good point... I guess the answer is if 2 GB is
> >enough RAM to have enough channels to overload the CPU and IO
> >bandwith of the host. Things like GigaSampler allow you to layer and
> >a bunch of instruments into one channel.
> >
> >I
I would also go for ICE1712. This chipset is started to be used in
consumer grade soundcards like Terratec 6fire, and I'm sure VIA/ICE have
something even more competitively priced stuff coming out soon to
compete with Creative and Crystal (why would they have acquired ICE in
the first place if al
>
> I'm living in germany / europe does that mean
> that I can ignore the US patents since we
> have a different patent system???
That's exactly the point now, isn't it?
Richard Smith is in the US.
Benno is in Italy.
[others maybe]
What would be the consequences for Benno coding against US pate
hiya,
you might find it useful to join the patents mailing list
http://liberte.aful.org/mailman/listinfo/patents
info is also on www.noepatents.org where you can sign the amazing
petition ;o)))
best,
m
--
__
/ \iriXx
\
From: Erik Walthinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gsmp-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] open-source like hardware
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:07:36 -0800 (PST)
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> > Building an external audio-box with multi analog input and outputs
> > containting at least on
From: Joachim Backhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Software patents ... was EVO legal status
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:34:44 +0100
> Hi,
>
> I'm living in germany / europe does that mean
> that I can ignore the US patents since we
> have a different patent system???
> (I thin
> there are 2 excellent books on GTK+ programming (both
> online), and an almost complete API reference manual online.
Where can I find them?
thanks
Marek
On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 01:20, Paul Davis wrote:
> >
> >> as i said, unix-like operating systems have done disk readahead for almost
> >> as long as unix-like operating systems have existed (and multics
> >> before them, i believe). we cannot allow nemesys/conexant to steal
> >> this technology by
On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 09:34, Joachim Backhaus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm living in germany / europe does that mean
> that I can ignore the US patents since we
> have a different patent system???
> (I think it's not going that way)
>
There are rumours floating around that the EU might want to adopt s/
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Richard Smith wrote:
>>> I have also been in contacted by Nemesis and they have indicated that
>>> if I were to do anything that infringes on thier patent(s) they
>>> _WILL_ litigate.
> I'm sure it had nothing to do with the fact that in an e-mail conversation with one
>of
Hi,
I'm living in germany / europe does that mean
that I can ignore the US patents since we
have a different patent system???
(I think it's not going that way)
Fuck software patents.
Regards
Joachim
PS: But if no one knows that I use patented technology ... ;)
Perhaps we can provide patented
31 matches
Mail list logo
