Hi,
SuperCollider will be free:
http://www.audiosynth.com/whyfree.html
if this was Slashdot I would say: "First post!!".
ciao,
--
Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org__
[OT] How do I unsubscribe to this mailing list?
/Mikael
regarding the provision of default values in LADSPA, I totally support
Tim's suggestion -- in fact, I reckon it is brilliant for reasons I'll
outline below :)
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:25:21PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> Steve Harris wrote:
>
> >On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:21:04 +0200, Tim Goetze
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 07:20 pm, Tobias Ulbricht wrote:
> one question:
> could you do this for the unsophisticated audiophile with less Acronyms?
> > > supply. Using a computer psu is going to severely limit what you are
> ^^^ = power supply unit?
Yes.
> > decouplin
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 06:40 pm, Tim Orford wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:19:48PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> :-) bring on the flames :-)
This is a flame? Tempest in a teacup... :-)
> and good quality audio sounds better?
> this is a new one to me - i've never heard anyone
> blame it on th
one question:
could you do this for the unsophisticated audiophile with less Acronyms?
What's all that:
> > supply. Using a computer psu is going to severely limit what you are
^^^ = power supply unit?
> decoupling is done at the amplifier rails, along with 'sag' co
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 18:40, Tim Orford wrote:
> So to get back to the original point, i'm sure the cards
> you mentioned are indeed fine cards, but if cost is no object
> (ha ha!) and if quality is your objective, then you will put your
> analogue converters in a separate box with a dedicated p
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 16:19, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Hmmm. You know, a linux based broadcast compressor (on the order of an
> Omnia6 or Optimod 8400) would be an interesting project. Someone who wants
> to do serious DSP work could have a field day doing multiband limiting and
> the various other
[I may regret this... :-)]
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 01:19 pm, Tim Orford wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > Also, due to the processing typical radio stations use in the air chain,
> > in many cases the quality of playback and record hardware for on-air use
> > must be up to the top quality of a record
On Friday 24 May 2002 22:11, Paul Davis wrote:
> By my standards, anybody who puts A-D/D-A conversion inside their
> computer chassis is by definition not concerned with "the best in the
> business". The term "professional audio" for me doesn't include analog
> I/O for a computer card unless the
Hi Nicolas,
There are advantages to writing your own RTP library
customized to the application -- sfront does this in its
implementation of MWPP, the MIDI RTP packetization we're
standardizing through the IETF. You can get a sense of the
complexity involved in writing a custom RTP libra
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 10:48:28PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Properly designed balanced in and out A/D and D/A converters can be completely
> immune to the PC's internal noise. But it all goes to proper design. The
> Antex SX series of cards likewise contain internal A/D converters. I have
Hi,
As suggested by Paul Davis in the Moog VCF thread, I implemented the
biquad filters found in
http://www.harmony-central.com/Computer/Programming/Audio-EQ-Cookbook.txt
and a simple resonant lowpass by Paul Kellett as LADSPA plugins:
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mana/kalsatools-current/vcf-
Hello,
I'm working on a project about adding RTP audioports to jMax
(http://www.ircam.fr/equipes/temps-reel/jmax/fr/index.php3), in order
to be able to do real-time streaming over the net between instances of jMax.
So, I am searching for people witch have try some RTP libraries because I have
Steve Harris wrote:
>On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:21:04 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
>> so what do you think about the actual proposal? (*DataLocation =
>> default in connect_port)
>
>I don't think it gains anything over Richards original suggestion, does
>it? The problem is that it moves the definitio
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:21:04 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> so what do you think about the actual proposal? (*DataLocation =
> default in connect_port)
I don't think it gains anything over Richards original suggestion, does
it? The problem is that it moves the definition of the defualt values awa
Taybin Rutkin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > LADSPA currently makes audio+control ports orthogonal to each other. i
> > don't think there are any LADSPA hosts at this time that allow the
> > user to connect the ports "by hand" ...
>
> Doesn't GLAME let you draw lines be
17 matches
Mail list logo
