Re: [linux-audio-dev] IRC

2002-06-22 Thread Vincent Touquet
Nope, not yet, I'm on my way though to join you :) Not everyone likes irc though, and that's ok :) regards Vini On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 02:59:30PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote: >I've been looking around for IRC channels populated by lad people but to >no avail. Have I missed a place, or is there none?

Re: [linux-audio-dev] the gibson patent

2002-06-22 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 02:39:18PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote: (cut) >And by the by, what on earth is going on with this? What's going on to >do something about this situation? It seems many people are aware of >the USPTO's idiocy, yet they are still allowed to carry on being >idiots. Why are people

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-22 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:13:43AM +0200, David Olofson wrote: >Well, I'll try to get started before you get bored... ;-) ;-) Well, I read all the stuff you wrote and I agree. Especially the idea of logical vertices and lines is a good one and most of the time, though not always beautiful ideas

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-22 Thread David Olofson
On Saturday 22 June 2002 15.38, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, David Olofson wrote: > > Actually, I have to agree, although it's not as simple as "XMMS > > is bad". There are two parts; the GUI and the window management. > > XMMS messes with *both*, for no good reason, and it doesn't

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-22 Thread David Olofson
On Friday 21 June 2002 21.30, nick wrote: > On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 18:40, Michael Toomim wrote: > > Why don't you just use Evas? It was designed for just what > > you're talking about. > > > > http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/evas.html > > Ive been thinking of using that myself. hardware acceler

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-22 Thread David Olofson
On Friday 21 June 2002 19.40, Michael Toomim wrote: > David Olofson wrote: > > * Fast, high quality rendering with OpenGL style > > blending effects and the like. (In fact, I'll > > probably use OpenGL for the first implementation. > > I've been messing a bit with 2D-on-OpenG

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-22 Thread David Olofson
On Friday 21 June 2002 19.29, Vincent Touquet wrote: [...] > On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 11:20:20PM +0200, David Olofson wrote: > >The design I have in mind could be implemented inside any toolkit > >that provides access to the underlying "drawing toolkit" - or > >directly on top of the rendering targ

[linux-audio-dev] IRC

2002-06-22 Thread Bob Ham
I've been looking around for IRC channels populated by lad people but to no avail. Have I missed a place, or is there none? Assuming the latter is the case, I've taken the liberty of registering #lad on irc.openprojects.net. Bob -- Bob Ham: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pkl.net/~node/ My music:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] using LADSPA under cygwin?

2002-06-22 Thread Peter Hanappe
I'm not sure I have the solution to your question, but maybe this gives you a hint. I guess dlopen in CygWin will try to load .dll files and not .so files. If that's indeed the case you'll need to convert from one to the other. You might want to check out http://www.nanotech.wisc.edu/~khan/softwa

Re: [linux-audio-dev] the gibson patent

2002-06-22 Thread Bob Ham
"To overcome the limitations and weaknesses of existing analog and digital technologies in the musical performance environment, applicant has invented a system that will allow..." Invent? I can't see how anyone would call protocol development 'inventing'. But then, this is the USPTO, whose idio

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-22 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, David Olofson wrote: > Actually, I have to agree, although it's not as simple as "XMMS is > bad". There are two parts; the GUI and the window management. XMMS > messes with *both*, for no good reason, and it doesn't even result in > a good user interface. The bypassing of