Re: [OT][linux-audio-dev] URGENT ATTENTION NEEDED

2002-09-02 Thread rm
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 06:05:48AM -0700, Mrs m mobutu Sese-seko wrote: > FROM:MRS. M SESE-SEKO > [...] just so this won't be a total waste, i submit for your amusement, http://www.xach.com/togo/index.html . it's a hilarious romp into the world of nigerian scam baiting. it contains such gems

[linux-audio-dev] URGENT ATTENTION NEEDED

2002-09-02 Thread Mrs m mobutu Sese-seko
FROM:MRS. M SESE-SEKO DEAR FRIEND, I AM MRS. SESE-SEKO WIDOW OF LATE PRESIDENT MOBUTU SESE-SEKO OF ZAIRE? NOW KNOWN AS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO (DRC). I AM MOVED TO WRITE YOU THIS LETTER, THIS WAS IN CONFIDENCE CONSIDERING MY PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCE AND SITUATION. I ESCAPED ALONG WIT

[linux-audio-dev] URGENT ATTENTION NEEDED

2002-09-02 Thread Mrs m mobutu Sese-seko
FROM:MRS. M SESE-SEKO DEAR FRIEND, I AM MRS. SESE-SEKO WIDOW OF LATE PRESIDENT MOBUTU SESE-SEKO OF ZAIRE? NOW KNOWN AS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO (DRC). I AM MOVED TO WRITE YOU THIS LETTER, THIS WAS IN CONFIDENCE CONSIDERING MY PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCE AND SITUATION. I ESCAPED ALONG WIT

[linux-audio-dev] URGENT ATTENTION NEEDED

2002-09-02 Thread Mrs m mobutu Sese-seko
FROM:MRS. M SESE-SEKO DEAR FRIEND, I AM MRS. SESE-SEKO WIDOW OF LATE PRESIDENT MOBUTU SESE-SEKO OF ZAIRE? NOW KNOWN AS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO (DRC). I AM MOVED TO WRITE YOU THIS LETTER, THIS WAS IN CONFIDENCE CONSIDERING MY PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCE AND SITUATION. I ESCAPED ALONG WIT

Re: [linux-audio-dev] managing installations from source [CVS]

2002-09-02 Thread Bob Ham
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 23:45, Vincent Touquet wrote: > How do you manage these from-source installs ? > Are there people who use stow ? stow++ -- Bob Ham: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pkl.net/~node All your rights are belong to us

Re: [linux-audio-dev] managing installations from source [CVS]

2002-09-02 Thread Conrad Parker
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:45:05AM +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote: > Hi, > > I ask this question here because I know > a lot of you manage to install lots of > applications from a fresh cvs snaphot > without troubles (I think ;). > > How do you manage these from-source installs ? > Are there peopl

[linux-audio-dev] [RFC SOURCE] rt_monitor take 2

2002-09-02 Thread Roger Larsson
With this monitor any process can request RT priorities. If those (or other) processes overloads the system. They will be returned to normal priorities. Note: * this code is still experimental. I had a complete lockup because my busy system detection did not work... (removed since it was not nece

[linux-audio-dev] managing installations from source [CVS]

2002-09-02 Thread Vincent Touquet
Hi, I ask this question here because I know a lot of you manage to install lots of applications from a fresh cvs snaphot without troubles (I think ;). How do you manage these from-source installs ? Are there people who use stow ? [cfr. http://www.gnu.org/software/stow/stow.html] Or does make i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Steve Harris
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:05:01 +0200, n++k wrote: > |> here, but i also think that o-o-p is a big performance burden in > |> most cases (otoh i seem to have a faible for aged hardware ;). > | > |I'm not to sure about the OOP comment. A few years ago I would have > > I think he meant _O_ut _O_f

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [SOURCE] rt monitor to kill runaway RT processes

2002-09-02 Thread Roger Larsson
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18.50, Paul Davis wrote: > [I wrote:] > >The only thing the sound servers need to be able to handle > >RT audio are: > >* one of the RT scheduling methods. > >* locked memory. (Not protected at the moment - hard limits?) > > >This can be archived with a wrapper that dr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread n++k
/wrote Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:27:50 +0100] |On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 06:22:33 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote: |> i think that Jack and its quick adoption shows the potential is |> here, but i also think that o-o-p is a big performance burden in |> most cases (otoh i seem t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Steve Harris
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 06:22:33 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote: > i think that Jack and its quick adoption shows the potential is > here, but i also think that o-o-p is a big performance burden in > most cases (otoh i seem to have a faible for aged hardware ;). I'm not to sure about the OOP comment.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Steve Harris
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 06:22:33 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote: > i believe that with patience and prudence 'lad' may be capable of > producing an interface definition capable of connecting all our > audio/MIDI apps and libraries in style, without deriving from CA > or VST. I agree. Entirely. But I ha

Re: [linux-audio-dev] 'nix Rt sampler

2002-09-02 Thread Brian Redfern
Take a look at the sourcecode for soundtracker (I didn't write it, of course), its got the midi-sample playback you're interested in. Also look at iiwusynth, which plays back soundfonts, and swami, which is used to edit soundfonts and uses iiwusynth for its playback engine. All of these are midi c

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Brian Redfern
Things may not actually bode that well for apple, most musicians I know are still on os9, using protools or cubase and have thousands of dollars invested in their plug-ins. The beauty of ladspa is that all you invest is time. I think apple is screwed in the long run because Verizon and the other m

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Tim Goetze
Paul Davis wrote: >steinberg; CoreAudio comes *with* OS X, and so they have no >distribution issues to worry about - its part of the same overall >license as the OS. i presume that means that implementing a version of >the API for a different OS is completely legal. header files? not >sure. that

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Question regarding network coding

2002-09-02 Thread Kjetil S. Matheussen
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Ivica Bukvic wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a quick question and am in a kind of a time crunch, so I'd > appreciate any help I can get (except for the RTFM-like comments :-). > > I am working on an app where I'll need some networking done. Basically, > I just need the applicat

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Steve Harris
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:41:10 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > my impression from reading the AudioUnits docs of late last year was > that there was no mention of graphics at all in the API. thats why it > seemed hard to figure out if they are in-process or o-o-p. otoh, i Yes, the API doc I found af

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Paul Davis
>> http://www.emagic.de/english/news/2002/osx3.html >> http://www.emagic.de/german/news/2002/osx3.html > >OK, so the inevitable question. do we know how 'free' the spec is giong to >be? Is it a good candidate for LADPA? > >I get the impression that the graphics API is tied to the DSP API, whic

[linux-audio-dev] 'nix Rt sampler

2002-09-02 Thread [3]
Hey guys, i was just wondering are/have any of you guys developed/tried developed/planning to develop a realtime software sampler fror linux... Any details on previous applications/attempts would be greatly appreciated... So would any advice on problems i'm likely to encounter.. I'm looking to dev

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-09-02 Thread Werner Schweer
On Friday 30 August 2002 20:41, Charles Read wrote: > Hi folks, > > is there a music notation program for linux that really does the job > well - you play your MIDI keyboard and a reasonable approximation to a > score appears on your screen? I've tried "rosegarden" but the editing > facilitie

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Steve Harris
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:23:36 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > http://www.emagic.de/english/news/2002/osx3.html > http://www.emagic.de/german/news/2002/osx3.html For those, like me who have no idea about the API, there are some docs at: http://qtj.apple.com/pub/audio/docs/com/apple/audio/un

Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

2002-09-02 Thread Steve Harris
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:23:36 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > http://www.emagic.de/english/news/2002/osx3.html > http://www.emagic.de/german/news/2002/osx3.html OK, so the inevitable question. do we know how 'free' the spec is giong to be? Is it a good candidate for LADPA? I get the impre