that it has N voices on at all times. Hmm. Still, VOICE_ALLOC is
akin to note_on.
Well, if a voice can be started and still actually both silent and
physically deactivated (that is, acting as or being a dump control
tracker) - then yes.
I personally find this notion bizarre and
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 04:46:19PM -0800, Josh Green wrote:
(cut)
I remember something similar being discussed on LAD a while back (but I
think it was about networking of Linux Audio prefessionals for contracts
and jobs, correct me if I'm wrong), perhaps this idea could be added to
that same
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:12:47PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
[cut]
The way I read Paul's note they are not restricted, therefore they are
public. Wouldn't want to drive that far and find out differently.
[cut]
Not sure whether this fits in here,
but I thought it might be interesting.
I
Commercial Software vendor tend to look for pratical solutions for the
problems at hand (even if sometimes it makes them really overlook some
technical and political point). I would be astonished to see Steinberg
Emagic Digidesign Cakewalk and the others agree on a solution that doesn't
solves
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:49:19 +0100, Sebastien Metrot wrote:
Commercial Software vendor tend to look for pratical solutions for the
problems at hand (even if sometimes it makes them really overlook some
technical and political point). I would be astonished to see Steinberg
Emagic Digidesign
The problem being that vstgui really stinks, most windows/mac people have no
idea about how powerful a gui toolkit can be compared to the native API.
Most people here seem to be used to much more powerful libs like gtk/Qt.
Good point about Gimp though :).
Sebastien
- Original Message -
Commercial Software vendor tend to look for pratical solutions for the
problems at hand (even if sometimes it makes them really overlook some
technical and political point). I would be astonished to see Steinberg
Emagic Digidesign Cakewalk and the others agree on a solution that doesn't
solves
Needless to say, this would be great for us if it has an FS compatible
licence. Do you know if theyre planning ot look at UI issues too, or just
the DSP code?
Why wait to look at this issue? Seems pertinent to linux-audio-dev
to discuss this now ...
From my standpoint, I'd love to see DSP
i made a small mistake in forwarding the message about the UAPA
meeting. it was not intended for public dissemination, even though the
meeting is open to the public. my bad, as they say.
--p
there are some people in the original To: list for the message i
forwarded who are talking about some related ideas. i can't say more
than that at this time.
--p
Why not? Shouldn't these sorts of discussions be wide open, Paul?
Or is it just a matter of it being too soon, and thus there
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:00:41 +0100, Jay Vaughan wrote:
From my standpoint, I'd love to see DSP processes written to a UAPA
have a completely text-based interface - stream in XML data, stream
it out, over a socket (what platform doesn't support this?).
Converting between ASCII and IEEE
Paul Davis wrote:
i made a small mistake in forwarding the message about the UAPA
meeting. it was not intended for public dissemination, even though the
meeting is open to the public. my bad, as they say.
As it's public, where's the problem? I didn't know about it, and I feel
informed when you
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:34:13 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
Its not an insurmountable problem, becasue a generic UI library would most
likely me somewwhat like libvstgui, which defines an API that pligins use
to provide controls (in theory). There is an implemntation of libvstgui
for IRIX + X
On Thursday 09 January 2003 10.17, Tim Hockin wrote:
that it has N voices on at all times. Hmm. Still, VOICE_ALLOC
is akin to note_on.
Well, if a voice can be started and still actually both silent
and physically deactivated (that is, acting as or being a dump
control tracker) -
Why not? Shouldn't these sorts of discussions be wide open, Paul?
Or is it just a matter of it being too soon, and thus there being
nothing to talk about?
The discussions will of course be wide open, most likely held on an email
listserv, once one gets set up. To encourage more
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 08:37, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Anyone remember the project mentioned on LAD before about an online
Linux Audio tech database? Cheers.
That was me.
http://www.djcj.org
I will be working on improving the functionality soon. I have been
overloaded recently actually
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:24:38AM -0800, Josh Green wrote:
Its really just an idea that I've been kicking around. I really like the
thought of meeting other Linux audio developers in person. Perhaps just
adding a couple check buttons to the database:
[X] Available for professional Linux
I personally find this notion bizarre and counter-intuitive. The
idea that the note is turned on by some random control is just
awkward. I'm willing to concede it, but I just want to be on the
record that I find it bizarre.
The way I see it, this random control that triggers a note is
18 matches
Mail list logo
