Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Thanks! This really helped me see straight again :-).
However this brings up one interesting point/problem. Due to GPL nature
of Linux software, many of our efforts will seamlessly bleed into OS X
world since there are no restrictions as to which platform this software
is run o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 21 Juin 2003 19:53, Ivica Bukvic a écrit :
> For instance, I would love to see KDE drop the ugly artsd and use either
> Jackd or alsa's dmix plugin, but that is not going to happen because
> they believe that artsd is better (for whatever odd reas
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 20:22:37 -0400, "Ivica Bukvic" wrote:
>Thanks! This really helped me see straight again :-).
>
>However this brings up one interesting point/problem. Due to GPL nature
>of Linux software, many of our efforts will seamlessly bleed into OS X
>world since there are no restrictions
> I wouldn't decline this idea so fast, i think he made a valid point.
> If you watch todays software market, especially the battle between the
> OSes, you can see Apple as well as M$ aquiring so-called
> "Killer-Applications" which shall force people who need that Apps to
> move to their OS. Espec
> I really don't see this as a problem.
Do you mind saying why?
The way I see it is it could be possibly because it feels good for a
developer to see that the interest in their creation is increasing
beyond the confines of the original platform, which certainly is good
for the developer as an ind
Am Son, 2003-06-22 um 02.46 schrieb Tim Hockin:
> > In the end, we will not reap what we have sown. Users on the OS X will
> > be theoretically able to run Ardour as much as we will, especially now
> > that jackd has been ported to OS X. To me, this does not seem right.
>
> I guess I don't see it
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 20:22:37 -0400
"Ivica Bukvic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks! This really helped me see straight again :-).
>
> However this brings up one interesting point/problem. Due to GPL nature
> of Linux software, many of our efforts will seamlessly bleed into OS X
> world since t
The problem I had with osx was that there wasn't enough good audio
freeware. Pd works well, and so does csound and soundhack, but I use a lot
of midi and find the lack of a free app like muse or rosegarden4 is not so
nice, given logic audio costs $750. What I did was go back to os9 on my
one machin
> In the end, we will not reap what we have sown. Users on the OS X will
> be theoretically able to run Ardour as much as we will, especially now
> that jackd has been ported to OS X. To me, this does not seem right.
I guess I don't see it as a problem. Forcing people to use this or that
software
> Perhaps we should make a mended version of GPL that would have exact
> permissions like the original GPL license, but in addition would ask
> that the software cannot be run on top of proprietary OS. This way, we
Sorry, meant to say commercial OS since obviously one could run such
software on OS
Thanks! This really helped me see straight again :-).
However this brings up one interesting point/problem. Due to GPL nature
of Linux software, many of our efforts will seamlessly bleed into OS X
world since there are no restrictions as to which platform this software
is run on, and Apple made an
> If you really believe a GNU/Linux system if a better choice because of
its
> open architecture, then hack some user-friendly tools, or ask someone
> else to do it.
I am. Check my website. But I am also running out of steam (or maybe I
am simply exhausted by the end-of-school-year syndrome, so ev
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 19:34:28 -0400
"Ivica Bukvic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although if I ended up running Linux on it I would be paying a lot more
> for (at best) comparable hardware shrink-wrapped in the pretty box. If
> that is all, then I guess I feel rehabilitated :-).
I have a 500Mhz G3
Although if I ended up running Linux on it I would be paying a lot more
for (at best) comparable hardware shrink-wrapped in the pretty box. If
that is all, then I guess I feel rehabilitated :-).
I am really thinking here whether OS X is worth the stab, or will I feel
caged once I abandon the freed
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:53:52 -0400
"Ivica Bukvic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just heard the news (rumors) of new Macs that are going to hit the
> streets on Monday. Seems like Apple is finally going to catch-up with
> the PC world: there's talk of using IBM's PowerPC 970 64-bit CPU'
> "Ivica Bukvic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Anyone care to comment or (please) dissuade me from potentially
> making a costly mistake? ;-)
I don't think it needs to be either/or -- I run sfront under Linux
at work doing real-time things, and I run sfront at home using OS X
doing real-time thi
Hi,
lördagen den 21 juni 2003 09.18 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Wanted to post a quick success story with the 2.5 kernel series:
> Machine
> processor VIA C3 Ezra
> cpu MHz : 932.918
> bogomips: 1843.20
> 256MB ram
>
> Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 AC97
Hi Ivica,
I'll rant on this for awhile.
I guess it all depends on what you require. There's
little doubt in my mind that the alternatives to linux
based audio production will have to take very serious
measures to compete with a looming problem. That being
pro audio tools that are free from moneta
a word of warning:
i just completely and utterly trashed my filesystems with 2.5.72-bk2 and
reiserfs. there are metric shitloads of errors on journal replay and i
end up in repair mode. did a couple of --rebuild-tree's, but new errors
cropped up after every reboot.
happens both on scsi and ide
> Hi all,
>
>[snip - mac news - ]
>
> Please don't get me wrong. I am still in favor of Linux, obviously due
> to its open architecture. But at the same time I am becoming a bit weary
> of having to "hack" my advanced audio settings rather than use
> user-friendly tools. That, coupled with still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 21 Juin 2003 11:53, Ivica Bukvic a écrit :
> Please don't get me wrong. I am still in favor of Linux, obviously due
> to its open architecture. But at the same time I am becoming a bit
> weary of having to "hack" my advanced audio settings rather th
Hi all,
Just heard the news (rumors) of new Macs that are going to hit the
streets on Monday. Seems like Apple is finally going to catch-up with
the PC world: there's talk of using IBM's PowerPC 970 64-bit CPU's.
Makes me wonder what repercussions this will have on the whole LAD/LAU
community, con
Wanted to post a quick success story with the 2.5 kernel series:
Machine
processor VIA C3 Ezra
cpu MHz : 932.918
bogomips: 1843.20
256MB ram
Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 AC97 Audio
Controller (rev 50)
Debian unstable.
This is the little VIA mini-itx
23 matches
Mail list logo
