On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 23:25, Pete Bessman wrote:
> At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:54:41 +,
> Bob Ham wrote:
> > Just to let you know I decided on LASH, which stands for 'LASH Audio
>
> w00t. I take all the credit, because I rule.
>
> /me hides
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 00:09, Dave Robillard wrote:
> L
At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:54:41 +,
Bob Ham wrote:
> Just to let you know I decided on LASH, which stands for 'LASH Audio
w00t. I take all the credit, because I rule.
/me hides
> Session Handler'. The recursive 'L' is because I've never felt
> particularly bound to linux *cough*hurd*cough*. A
Marek Peteraj wrote:
Suddenly you're now speaking as the representative of the whole Linux
audio community. But you're not. Neither am I. The only true
representatives of the Linux Audio community are the Linux Audio
Developers.
ehh??
where's the logic in that??
as a composer, i say: what good is
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 11:54, Matthias Nagorni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after I noticed that polyphony was completely broken in ams < 1.7.2
> I rapidly fixed it (thanks to Fons Adriaensen for valueable hints).
Very cool; my apologies for not getting the promised test cases in
quickly, I was away for t
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Doug Wellington wrote:
>> The big difference is that when the job is done, the result is
>> *really* yours to keep. You won't find yourself forced to move to a
>> new environment a few years later, just because someone decides it's
>
> Heehee... I know plenty of people still
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 16:04, Doug Wellington wrote:
> old thing...? Heck, no technology is immune to the "obsolesence due
> to latest and greatest" syndrome. Look at my Waldorf Microwave XT...
> Sigh...
>
Survey says---bzt. It's immune right up until something in the
hardware b
Previously:
>> Reminds me of that old saying, "Linux is only free if your time
>> isn't worth anything"...
>
> True, sort of, but you have to remember that "there's no such thing
> as a free lunch."
TANSTAAFL - exactly! There's always a price. Either you do it
yourself, or you have someone else
Just to let you know I decided on LASH, which stands for 'LASH Audio
Session Handler'. The recursive 'L' is because I've never felt
particularly bound to linux *cough*hurd*cough*. API, website and
mailing list changes to follow (at some point :)
Cheers all,
Bob
--
Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Previously:
>> So, are you saying this thing can compete with a $100,000 Alsihad
>> rig?
>
> No, but then I've not tried either. Realistically, I'd expect the
> service level to be very different. For US $0.1m I'd expect a lot of
> hand holding.
Heehee, for $12k I would still want a lot of handhol
Steve Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:55:54 +, Simon Jenkins wrote:
This will 'work', AFAICS, but with one cycle delay.
One or two cycles, depending on whether the client containing A and B
guesses
correctly that A comes before B in the overall graph. (It doesn't know).
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 11:11, Daniel James wrote:
> > > The article is also on the SoS website, but it is only available
> > > to subscribers for the first six months.
> > >
> > > http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb04/articles/mirrorimage.htm
> >
> > i would very much like to have a copy of this art
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 11:01, Daniel James wrote:
> > > there are people /other/ than linux audio developers who will be
> > > on the stand at Sounds Expo. its not just an audio development
> > > forum.
> >
> > such as?
>
> Users and musicians. I'm no developer - never claimed to be.
...
>
> > >
Dear list,
I can't believe I am chiming in on this because I know nothing about the
project or the individuals involved. So consider this an "outside the
beltway opinion" from Joe Sixpack (politics are in the air here) ---
ignore it at your discretion... but LASH says "to cut with a whip" to
me. O
Hello,
after I noticed that polyphony was completely broken in ams < 1.7.2
I rapidly fixed it (thanks to Fons Adriaensen for valueable hints).
Some of the patches used for the sound examples published by german
Keyboards magazine are now available for download as well.
You might also enjoy th
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 15.44, Doug Wellington wrote:
[...]
> Reminds me of that old saying, "Linux is only free if your time
> isn't worth anything"...
True, sort of, but you have to remember that "there's no such thing as
a free lunch."
The big difference is that when the job is done, the r
http://plugin.org.uk/timemachine/
* Now uses GTK, instead of SDL to draw the window, hopefully a bit
more friendly on maintainers.
* Meters.
* Now records up to 8 channels (use the -c flag).
* Can set the output directory/file prefix (-p flag).
* Hiting the window close i
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 16.53, Martijn Sipkema wrote:
[...]
> > The driver is supposed to just clip at 2048x2048. Some tester
> > concluded it does on Windoze, but I haven't tried it on the Linux
> > drivers. (Though they even have the same bugs as the Windows
> > drivers, so I'd guess they're p
> So, are you saying this thing can
> compete with a $100,000 Alsihad rig?
No, but then I've not tried either. Realistically, I'd expect the
service level to be very different. For US $0.1m I'd expect a lot of
hand holding.
> I actually HAVE developed my own rig.
Me too. It's clearly not aime
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:53:54PM +0100, Martijn Sipkema wrote:
> I know SGI hardware supports multiple pixel formats in one framebuffer,
> but I'm not sure it is possible to render to more than visual at a time; I
> doubt
> it.
So does Sun hardware and some matrox's (I think thats what some chea
> [...]
> > > Right, but resolution is just a matter of RAMDAC parameters. All
> > > I want is a 3856x1536 framebuffer with one RAMDAC displaying a
> > > 2048x1536 window and the other displaying a 1808x1356 window. I
> > > don't care about one tiny MB of VRAM being invisible.
> >
> > True, this sh
Previously:
>That might seem expensive compared to the cost of the hardware, but
>it's a complete system. Whether this is good value depends on how
>much you value your time, because you could spend a couple of years
>developing your own. Custom Pro Tools rigs can cost up to US$100,000.
I appre
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 09.57, Martijn Sipkema wrote:
[...]
> > Right, but resolution is just a matter of RAMDAC parameters. All
> > I want is a 3856x1536 framebuffer with one RAMDAC displaying a
> > 2048x1536 window and the other displaying a 1808x1356 window. I
> > don't care about one tiny MB
> > I'm not sure how keen they would be on this, as it is featured as
> > the top 'eSub' (online-only subscription) item on the homepage at
> > the moment:
>
> Actually, that list is randomly generated, hit reload :)
It stays the same for me - perhaps that's a quirk of my Squid cache.
At least th
> My local sales guy was at NAMM looking at the Mediastation X-76 for
> me. Have you seen the price of this thing??? M.S.R.P
> $12,000.00!!!
That might seem expensive compared to the cost of the hardware, but
it's a complete system. Whether this is good value depends on how
much you value your
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:11:49 +, Daniel James wrote:
> I'm not sure how keen they would be on this, as it is featured as the
> top 'eSub' (online-only subscription) item on the homepage at the
> moment:
Actually, that list is randomly generated, hit reload :)
- Steve
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:55:54 +, Simon Jenkins wrote:
> >This will 'work', AFAICS, but with one cycle delay.
> >
> One or two cycles, depending on whether the client containing A and B
> guesses
> correctly that A comes before B in the overall graph. (It doesn't know).
No, its always 1, th
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Daniel James wrote:
> > > The article is also on the SoS website, but it is only available
> > > to subscribers for the first six months.
> > >
> > > http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb04/articles/mirrorimage.htm
> >
> > i would very much like to have a copy of this article fo
> > The article is also on the SoS website, but it is only available
> > to subscribers for the first six months.
> >
> > http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb04/articles/mirrorimage.htm
>
> i would very much like to have a copy of this article for the LAD
> page. i'm rewriting it, and i want to add
> > there are people /other/ than linux audio developers who will be
> > on the stand at Sounds Expo. its not just an audio development
> > forum.
>
> such as?
Users and musicians. I'm no developer - never claimed to be.
> > > I propose the following - on sounds expo we should promote LAD
> > >
++LASH.
It is a real word, short and sweet, with a meaning that is relevant to
its purpose. I rather like it.
[pb]
[...]
> > > There is another mode, where a single buffer forms a big desktop,
> > > of which each RAMDAC displays a part. Seems like stupid driver
> > > limitations restrict this mode to using the same resolution for
> > > both heads, but I'm not sure.
> >
> > It is to be expected that a single ren
31 matches
Mail list logo
