On ons, 2004-09-01 at 21:26, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 07:48, martin rumori wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:31:01AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:03:18 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> > > > so if I'm writing a osc sequencer, is the best plan to
Hallo,
Dave Robillard hat gesagt: // Dave Robillard wrote:
> Imagine a sequencer where, instead of little straight bars representing
> notes, the 'piano roll' just allowed you to draw a line to represent
> frequency.. with any angle, straight or curved (bezier), etc. Wow..
>
> Control could be li
Dave Robillard:
> On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 07:48, martin rumori wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:31:01AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:03:18 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
>> > > so if I'm writing a osc sequencer, is the best plan to leave the
>> > > mapping open for the
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 04:38, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 03:21:17PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 04:52, Steve Harris wrote:
> > > I dont really think OSC needs to replace MIDI, if your doing 12 tone,
> > > limited polyphony, bandwisth etc. stuff, which mo
OSC over bluetooth is interesting. Any comments on it? How easy is the
hardware to build? I know you can wire PICs to USB easily, but I dont know
much about bluetooth.
Would it be worth adding a bluetooth transport to liblo?
i never was able to get below a latency nelow 15-20 ms and spikes here
an
Hi guys,
I'm coding a software implementation of a buffer for PIO-DA16 (icpdas).
I'd like to know what a stream of stereo PCM data looks like
and how a Digital-toAnalog-Converter understands, which
part of data belongs to which channel in a stereo PCM stream.
Rgds,
Anton
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:24:11PM +0200, Artem Baguinski wrote:
> it wasn't maintained since around piksel gathering (nov 2003)... oh, and
> i'm afraid i have fixed some bugs on artist's offline machine and never
> brought the sources back to piksel site. the fixes made it compatible
> with Max
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 03:21:17PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 04:52, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I dont really think OSC needs to replace MIDI, if your doing 12 tone,
> > limited polyphony, bandwisth etc. stuff, which most people are, its fine.
> >
> > - Steve
>
> Sure, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Albert Graef) writes:
> Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> Has anyone else looked at O'Caml? :
>> http://www.ocaml.org/
>> I've been coding in it for about 6 weeks and I'm REALLY enjoying
>> it. Its the most fun I've had coding in ages.
>
> Yes, those modern functional languages
