Re: [linux-audio-dev] TAP EQ problems

2005-08-05 Thread Tom Szilagyi
Hi all, just noticed the thread, I hope it's not too late to chime in. The problem is most likely due to a denormal bug. However, I have not been able to see it, in fact the machines (two not-so-new Pentium-4 and one fairly old Pentium-3) I can access for testing don't exhibit any such issue. TAP

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Libs for reading/writing midis

2005-08-05 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
> > libmidifile would be cute, is any of the existing codebases flexible > > enough so that it could be massaged into a nice lib? > > vote++ to everything you said. dunno about any existing midi code though > flexible enough to be put into a lib.. After taking a glance at > rosegarden and muse's so

Re: [linux-audio-dev] TAP EQ problems

2005-08-05 Thread Tim Goetze
[Tim Blechmann] >> Similar approach works fine here, too (flipping the sign of the >> addition constant at every sample or every block, depending on the >> algorithm in question). >> >> Inaudible (in fact barely measurable), code is branchless and simple. >> Perfect solution for a stupid litt

Re: [linux-audio-dev] TAP EQ problems

2005-08-05 Thread Tim Blechmann
> >Interesting. So again I'm inclined to think that the reported problem > >is due to denormals. > > > >I usually do a very blunt ... + 1e-20 at strategic places. So far, > >nobody has complained about the DC offset :-) > > Similar approach works fine here, too (flipping the sign of the > additio

[linux-audio-dev] NPTL hell on debian might come to an end (Fw: Bug#266507 acknowledged by developer (Bug#266507: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3))

2005-08-05 Thread Florian Schmidt
Let's hope for the best :) Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:35:40 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Florian Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#266507 acknowledged by developer (Bug#266507: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3) This is an automatic

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Libs for reading/writing midis

2005-08-05 Thread James McDermott
> It seems like every single Windows audio app has to support like 6 > different audio backends plus Rewire/Rewire2. What's up with that, is > there no single standard for interapplication audio routing like JACK? > > ;-) Ok, not *every* query about Linux audio has to be answered by pointing out

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Libs for reading/writing midis

2005-08-05 Thread Florian Schmidt
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 11:52:44 +0200 Mario Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reusability of code is a quite valid point, and I thought the OP's > question was quite interesting. > > We shouldn't define ourselves in terms of what windows does. Frankly, I don't > care anymore, its now 8 years since

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Libs for reading/writing midis

2005-08-05 Thread Mario Lang
Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 16:56 +, Will Woodruff wrote: >> It seems like every single linux midi app has it's own code for >> reading/writing midi files. What's up with that? Are there no quality >> libraries? > > It seems like every single Windows audio ap