jack_capture is a small program to capture whatever
sound is going out to your speakers into a file without
every having to patch jack connections, fiddle around with
fileformats, or set options on the argument line.
This is the program I always wanted to have for jack, but no
one made. So her
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 00:21 +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This weekend I've discovered a (serious) kernel scheduling latency issue
> with the current ieee1394 kernel drivers. Before I submit something
> about this to lkml, I'd like some more tests. I've been able to
> reproduce thi
Hi all,
This weekend I've discovered a (serious) kernel scheduling latency issue
with the current ieee1394 kernel drivers. Before I submit something
about this to lkml, I'd like some more tests. I've been able to
reproduce this on two different machines, so I suspect that this is a
more gener
svn should once again have working (better than before the libsndfile
changes) support for tape tracks. what a total pain this has been, but i
think the end result is worth it - a standard library shared with other
apps. let me know if you have issues with it. it may not work with
existing sessions
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 02:46:37 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > Let's just standardize an extension for latency ports after the release
> > of LV2. And let's do it FAST, so that most plugin writers will be
> > porting their plugins with the extension in place.
>
> I think this should be included
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 21:37 +0300, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:58 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:26 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:39:30 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > > I can make the plugin validating host check the la
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:58 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:26 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:39:30 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > I can make the plugin validating host check the latency primitively (eg
> > > run a single sample through the buffer)
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:58 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:26 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:39:30 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > I can make the plugin validating host check the latency primitively (eg
> > > run a single sample through the buffer)
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:26 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:39:30 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > I can make the plugin validating host check the latency primitively (eg
> > run a single sample through the buffer) and fail if it isn't reported
> > correctly, so we're sure t
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:26 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:39:30 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > I can make the plugin validating host check the latency primitively (eg
> > run a single sample through the buffer) and fail if it isn't reported
> > correctly, so we're sure t
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:39:30 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> I can make the plugin validating host check the latency primitively (eg
> run a single sample through the buffer) and fail if it isn't reported
> correctly, so we're sure the LADSPA latency woes are gone.
What if it's a delay line? I
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 08:51 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> There's been little news on the LV2 front here recently, all the disucssion
> seems to have taken place on IRC, so a quick update:
>
> Theres now a website: http://lv2plug.in/ as of a couple od days ago,
> thanks to Thorsten Wilms which has
I thought it might be of interest to other plugin developers to learn what
my experiences were of porting my LADSPA plugins to the LV2 draft.
As some of you may know the primary source for my plugins is a wierd XML
format, so porting that was fiddly, but didn't involve much manual effort,
"just" c
There's been little news on the LV2 front here recently, all the disucssion
seems to have taken place on IRC, so a quick update:
Theres now a website: http://lv2plug.in/ as of a couple od days ago,
thanks to Thorsten Wilms which has links to drafts of the C header file
and RDF/Turtle schema. Pleas
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:05:33 +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
> Because people actually use them in Om, because people actually use Om
> unlike certain other modulars. volt per octave is pretty damn obscure
> in a computer program If i wanted to have a cutoff at concert A
> what the hell is that
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:57:43 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > :somePort lv2:unit unit:octavePitch ;
> > lv2:baseFreq 264.0 .
> >
> > It's not beyond the realms of the possible to describe the mathematical
> > relationship between the octave pitch unit and Hz, but it's probably
> > e
16 matches
Mail list logo
