Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Robin Gareus hat gesagt: // Robin Gareus wrote:
historically Karlsruhe Thu/Fri vs. Sat/Sun - this year was different:
Berlin weekdays vs. Berlin weekend - with a smaller audience on the last
two days ;-)
what is the location in Cologne like? - will there be Studen
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
I know it's not really what you mean, but it seems to me that duplicating
the current methodologies and replacing every "professional" costly
application with an exact free software counterpart that happens to
Steve Harris wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007, at 16:01, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of Live, but it's
not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
use it anyways unless it gets opens
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:27:11PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Linux didn't stay an "amateuer" platform in other areas, why should
> free software not be professionally used in the audio world as well?
There is no good reason why free software shouldn't be used, but not
everything required in
On 3/28/07, Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hallo,
Robin Gareus hat gesagt: // Robin Gareus wrote:
> historically Karlsruhe Thu/Fri vs. Sat/Sun - this year was different:
> Berlin weekdays vs. Berlin weekend - with a smaller audience on the last
> two days ;-)
>
> what is the location
Hallo,
Robin Gareus hat gesagt: // Robin Gareus wrote:
> historically Karlsruhe Thu/Fri vs. Sat/Sun - this year was different:
> Berlin weekdays vs. Berlin weekend - with a smaller audience on the last
> two days ;-)
>
> what is the location in Cologne like? - will there be Students lingering
> d
Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
>> We are, as we have been always, quite on our own in this little pocket
>> universe of ours.
>
> I think this issue is amplified by the fact that the conference also targets
> by and large the same crowd.
what's the difference between Linux-Audio-Developer meeting and
Hallo,
nescivi hat gesagt: // nescivi wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:25, Malte Steiner wrote:
> > so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or newspages, neither on
> > Linux related nor electronic music ones.
>
> For what it's worth:
> the TU PR did actually quite a good job at promo
Hallo,
Fons Adriaensen hat gesagt: // Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> > Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of Live, but it's
> > not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
> > use it anyways unless it gets op
>From the "debug OSC during lecture talks" dept.
* dump UDP data from a port to stdout
* forward/relay UDP data to one or more UDP ports.
- C source attached - no compile flags needed
The "hacked in Berlin's U-bahn" dept. pre-releases
jplay2 (formerly jadio) - jack-plays-it-all
http://mi
nescivi wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 27 March 2007 17:01, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> If you have made some nice pictures they can be added here as well.
>> Please send them to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> we mean of course: lac2006 _at_ robin.kgw.tu-berlin.de
>
hmm, isn't that supposed to be lac2007 _at_ ro
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
>
> I know it's not really what you mean, but it seems to me that duplicating
> the current methodologies and replacing every "professional" costly
> application with an exact free software counterpart that happens to run
> under linu
GMIDImonitor is GTK+ application that shows MIDI events.
New in this release:
* Fix bug causing stalled midi events after burst followed by silence
* Decode jack midi reset message (by Edward Tomasz Napierala)
* Add some instructions about using GMIDImonitor.
Project site:
https://gmidimonitor
Hi all,
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 17:01, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> If you have made some nice pictures they can be added here as well.
> Please send them to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we mean of course: lac2006 _at_ robin.kgw.tu-berlin.de
and we mean of course: send us a link to the tarball to download.
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>> Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of Live, but it's
>> not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
>> use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
>
> There are probably many of us thinking the same wa
Hi all,
*the 5th International Linux Audio Conference *is *over.* The lac
organization team 2007 had a busy but good time and we hope you enjoyed
your stay in Berlin too. *As always many thanks to all participants,
speakers, artists, partners and helpers! *This great event would not
have been
On 27 Mar 2007, at 16:01, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of Live, but it's
not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
There are
Hiho,
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:25, Malte Steiner wrote:
> so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or newspages, neither on
> Linux related nor electronic music ones.
For what it's worth:
the TU PR did actually quite a good job at promoting the conference.
I did not get a complete overv
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Dave Phillips wrote:
LJ didn't think it worthy enough to fund a reporter's trip.
FWIW, LWN would have been (or would be) more than interested in coverage
from this conference. And, yes, we can pay for it - as long as you're
not looking to get rich. There's a
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Maybe one day there will be a Linux version of Live, but it's
> not something I particularily look forward to, as I wouldn't
> use it anyways unless it gets opensource'd.
There are probably many of us thinking the same way.
But
Hallo,
Pieter Palmers hat gesagt: // Pieter Palmers wrote:
> They didn't express anything special during the conference. One of their
> founders (at least I think he is) was there, and apparently he's an old
> student of TU-Berlin, and TU-Berlin just asked.
>
> During the panel discussion he ba
Pieter Palmers wrote:
Dave Phillips wrote:
Lars Luthman wrote:
Wasn't this years LAC sponsored by Ableton though?
They are listed as one of the partners. AFAIK they've shown no public
interest in Linux, nor have they announced any intention to port
their products to Linux. Perhaps they ma
On Tuesday 27 Mar 2007 14:08, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> During the panel discussion he basically said that the "sell
> shrinkwrapped boxes" model works pretty fine for them and that he
> doesn't see any reasons for them to change. And I think he also said
> that he didn't see any opportunities for op
Dave Phillips wrote:
Lars Luthman wrote:
Wasn't this years LAC sponsored by Ableton though?
They are listed as one of the partners. AFAIK they've shown no public
interest in Linux, nor have they announced any intention to port their
products to Linux. Perhaps they made some statement at th
> We are, as we have been always, quite on our own in this little pocket
> universe of ours.
I think this issue is amplified by the fact that the conference also targets
by and large the same crowd. I am also not convinced that we would not be
able to find some software allies provided we begin ca
They are listed as one of the partners. AFAIK they've shown no public
interest in Linux, nor have they announced any intention to port their
products to Linux. Perhaps they made some statement at the conference ?
Anyone know exactly what their interest in Linux amounts to ?
Nothing particula
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
For next year, how about sending a press-release to:
http://www.harmony-central.com/news_submissions.html
They appear to me as being fairly Linux friendly?
Not that I can tell (and I do like Harmony Central, I recommend it to my
students).
They have an outdated p
I agree that not many people that aren't directly involved with Linux
audio software care about it, but the Slashdot crowd is hardly
representative for most Linux and free software users. I hope.
There are some other blogs which should be notified, e.g.
createdigitalmusic.com
http://www.pro-l
Lars Luthman wrote:
I agree that not many people that aren't directly involved with Linux
audio software care about it, but the Slashdot crowd is hardly
representative for most Linux and free software users. I hope.
It's not the crowd that's at issue, it's the fact that a great many /.
reade
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:46 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Malte Steiner wrote:
>
> > so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or newspages, neither
> > on Linux related nor electronic music ones.
>
> Nope, they're generally not interested. [...]
For next year, how about sending a press-
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:46 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Malte Steiner wrote:
>
> > so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or newspages, neither
> > on Linux related nor electronic music ones.
>
> Nope, they're generally not interested. The last time I notified
> Slashdot about the c
Malte Steiner wrote:
so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or newspages, neither
on Linux related nor electronic music ones.
Nope, they're generally not interested. The last time I notified
Slashdot about the conference they put it in their Linux section and it
got little response
Hello,
so far I cant find reports on LAC 2007 on Blogs or newspages, neither on
Linux related nor electronic music ones. Tonight I want blog myself some
(subjective) impression and would like to gather some nice photos, I
have only done some crappy images with my mobile. Then I would start to
33 matches
Mail list logo
