On Wednesday 05 May 2004 09:04 am, Steve Harris wrote:
> Actaully I think the flash language and protocol are open, its just the
> shockwave implementation thats closed. I could be wrong though.
I remember downloading and reading the specs a few years ago, so they are
definitely open. At th
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 02:18 pm, Cournapeau David wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Beginning to play with some code in linux plateform for audio, I
> face a major problem: I have a very weak understanding of thread
> programming. I know the basic concepts (thread principle, mutex and
> lock), but fai
On Thursday 26 February 2004 09:04 am, Paul Davis wrote:
> the problem is that in a typical DAW session, you can potentially
> freeze most tracks most of the time. so how can you tell what the user
> wants frozen and what they don't?
I want my plug-ins frozen the instant I close the parameter
On Thursday 26 February 2004 10:25 am, Paul Davis wrote:
> > I want my plug-ins frozen the instant I close the parameter editor.
> > ;)
>
> oh, you don't want to do any graphical editing of plugin parameter
> automation? :))
Well then - as soon as I stop editing the automation data ;)
>
On Thursday 26 February 2004 12:26 pm, Paul Davis wrote:
> >A bit more seriously, offline rendering in a tree graph works for 3d
> > editing, and has worked for a number of years. I think it's a natural
> > progression to try the same concepts on audio.
>
> with the greatest respect, this is how au
On Thursday 26 February 2004 12:22 pm, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> torsdagen den 26 februari 2004 17.54 skrev Benjamin Flaming:
> > ... and Tinara is what I want ;)
>
> I want that too, are you a mind reader? :-o
Yes, and I knew you were going to ask
In all honesty,
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 01:52 pm, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2004 20.25, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Recently Logic 6's Freeze feature was mentioned here, and Freeze
> > is mentioned in a new interview at Emagic's webpage:
> >
> > Q: Any other favorite f
On Monday 09 February 2004 09:57 pm, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> On tis, 2004-02-10 at 03:45, Benjamin Flaming wrote:
> > On Monday 09 February 2004 05:58 pm, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:50, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> > > > jack works with intel83
On Monday 09 February 2004 05:58 pm, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:50, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> > jack works with intel830 DRI
>
> Hmm.. I only have Radeon's, so I'm a bit out of luck as far as testing
> other cards I guess.
>
> Anyone else have a positive/negative experience?
No
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 01:53 pm, Stefan Nitschke wrote:
> Its not my intention to blame Linux or the Linux-Community but it is
> in consequence the only way to prevent such postings in the future.
It would seem to me that your behavior will *encourage* such postings in
the future. The
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 08:08 pm, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> > Just to say that obviously the consortium is not entirely made up of
> > corporate "wolves"who don't know or don't care about freedom
> > (honestly I don't see how one could reach this conclusion looking at
> > the curren
On Saturday 17 January 2004 04:52 am, Steve Harris wrote:
> Yes, yes, yes. Personally I would be very temped to do the rendering with
> OpenGL, you have to do a bit more work yourself, but if you start with
> something like GTK you will do a lot of overrinding and defining your own
> behaviours any
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 11:54 am, Fernando Ramirez wrote:
> Hi. I need to know if there exists or if someone have coded a device driver
> that may split one stereo source input (/dev/dsp0) to two pseudo devices
> (something like /dev/dsp0L for left channel and /dev/dsp0R for right
> channel)
On Friday 28 November 2003 11:54 am, David Olofson wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 15.07, Stonekeeper wrote:
[...]
> However, I think the proper solution is to install things so that you
> never have dependencies in the wrong direction. It makes some sense
> that libs in /usr shouldn't depend
On Friday 28 November 2003 08:07 am, Stonekeeper wrote:
> It was much simpler than that: The Open source philosophy (or lack of)
> wouldn't be the primary concern for musicians "jumping ship". Most
> (IMHO) would simply move out of cost (I hate to think how much all those
> LADSPA plugins would co
On Thursday 27 November 2003 03:04 am, Stonekeeper wrote:
> Do you think a port of Sonar or Nuendo to linux would be a good thing?
No.
> If so, and it happened, i promise you it would not be open source. These
> people need to make a living. I believe it _would_ talk to JACK, LADSPA,
> etc (it wo
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 08:55 pm, Thomas Webb wrote:
> > As a general rule, musicians who don't care about
> > proprietary vs. open source
> > won't be running Linux to begin with.
>
> I hope this won't always be true. It if it, Linux has
> no future.
I must respectfully disagree. I do
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 09:23 pm, Ken Locarnini wrote:
> Unfortunately this world runs on money. People need it to survive and I
> think that there is only so much time in a persons life, so if choosing
> between having some money and getting paid for one's time, that "need" will
> drive one
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 08:42 pm, Billy Biggs wrote:
> Benjamin Flaming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > [...] but I'm puzzled by your mention of authors being "unable" to
> > release their code. [...]
>
> I have seen these cases specifically:
>
> 1. Win
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 07:35 pm, Billy Biggs wrote:
> Hi Lea,
>
> Stonekeeper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 19:01, Juan Linietsky wrote:
> > > It's not bad, but it's not really free (OpenSource),
> >
> > Generally, musicians don't give a toss whether something is
> > free(
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 03:01 pm, Iain Duncan wrote:
> - if I do POSIX pthreads or multiple processes, will the code be an easy
> port to MacOSX? And what about windows, would one be able to run it under
> Cygwin or something?
I don't know anything about the other questions you asked in your p
On Thursday 20 November 2003 02:05 am, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> Thursday 20 November 2003 05.08 skrev Paul Davis:
> > http://www.fxfreeze.com/product.html
>
> Yeah. The idea that you could forget about "poliphony" is perhaps most
> important though ;).
>
> Actually, I've been thinking about similar
I'm not entirely sure whether this is the right place to be posting this or
not. I've been having some strange issues with the OSS emulation in the 2.6
kernel. With each new kernel release, programs which use OSS have taken
progressively longer to start up. Audacity now take about 20 seconds.
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:17:41 +0200
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, if heared many good stuff about PortAudio where is the homepage ?
http://www.portaudio.com/
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:18:22 +0200
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, will be new drivers available for oss ? And will alsa-drivers be ported ?
The 2.6.0-test5 kernel lists OSS as "(DEPRECATED)", hinting that it probably won't be
around at some time in the future. This would certainly suggest t
25 matches
Mail list logo
