Re: [linux-audio-dev] sampler instrument definition standard needed

2006-11-22 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 18:41 +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Hey, don't throw such words at me! A committee usually involves exclusion of > people (and is often a playground for people with profile neurosis). That > mailing list was public though and without any pseudo "official" attitude.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] sampler instrument definition standard needed

2006-11-22 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 14:17 +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > so i suppose the best way would be to reimplement sf2 as some kind of > > xsfz format, write a forth-back conversion library/utility and release > > the whole work under a bsd licence to make it easy for free and > > commercial dev

Re: [linux-audio-dev] sampler instrument definition standard needed

2006-11-22 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
... On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 10:27 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:30:10AM +0100, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote: > > hi everybody, > > > > i'm looking for a sampler instrument file format similar to .nki, .sf2 > > or akai instruments. is there a

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [Freebob-devel] [ANN] FreeBoB 1.0 released - Firewire Audio for Linux

2006-10-18 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Ger

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA2" naming redux

2006-05-05 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
g. do something irrational please. :) -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays changes to "LADSPA2" strawman

2006-04-28 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
;m sure we can put in more! -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA2" name

2006-04-27 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
ok, here's my vote. openplux>plux>ladspa2 On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 11:36 -0700, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: > I vote for "LADSPA" as well. > -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA2" name

2006-04-27 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:37 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > May be Plux ? say like plux is plugin llibrary Your search - openplux - did not match any documents. > > Uwe > > -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Todays changes to "LADSPA2" strawman

2006-04-27 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
logarithmic. if it's not fit-for-purpose as specified then > we can specify it differently. it's in ladspa 1 :) its however really causing headaches on the host side. the default host lib should provide some means to convert linear/logarithmic properly. > > -DR- >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-27 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
> > - Steve -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 04:55 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > SLAP - Simpler Linux Audio Plugin i like that :D > -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 04:55 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > > > > > What about SHAG: Steve Harris' Audio Gear > > actually, now that i think about it "AudioGear" would be a fancy name, no? > -- -- l

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
uper, Second, Sophisticated, System, Steve, Sourcecode, Syntax, > Structure, Success, Superb, Superior. To name a few, well, I'm sure there > are better alternatives. What about SHAG: Steve Harris' Audio Gear -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
nd it will refuse, but if through some miracle > ladspa:InputControPort becomes ladspa:OutputControlPort then all kinds of > crazy shit will go down. segfaults will only be ok as long as there are no security advisories. beware the rdf exploits. :) -- -- leonard "paniq" ritt

Re: [linux-audio-dev] "LADSPA 2" name

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
)? GO FAP! FAP FAP FAP! i also would like CLAP. :) > -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
ng instantiated? > > Thats likely to cause all manner of excitement. the erotic kind of excitement? ;) -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-25 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 19:59 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 01:23 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 18:46 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > Plugins must be able to refuse hosts and hosts must be able to refuse > >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-25 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
> This, like most everything else, is in the data file. You really need > to read more than the header before commenting further ;) the trusty header should be all documentation required... there was also no reference to additional documents in it. how about adding it? :o) > > -DR- > -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-25 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
> If we ever have an ABI change in the future then the LADSPA 1 > pseudo-compatibility will be lost anyway. there is a difference between fixing and recompiling code ;) -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-25 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
irable anyway. With some of the (potential) new > capbilities there are less ugly ways to do some of the things DSSI does, > DSSI 2 should be much less complex that 1. > how are parameter boundaries determined now? are all parameters clamped to 0..1 (as vst does)? if yes, shouldnt this b

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-25 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
host with ease (yes, people do not like to fix orphaned code and recompile binaries, imagine!). furthermore, DSSI builds upon ladspa. a ladspa 2 enforces also a DSSI 2. again, looking at the slight changes that ladspa underwent, i dont see what the big fuzz is about. grumpily yours, -- -- leon

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Update to LADSPA 2 strawman

2006-04-25 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
Their constant. > > But that's what I was trying to avoid, the current sitatuion is that all > LADSPA plugins speak only IEEE floats, and that's really nice. > > You can end up burning a lot of memory bandwidth and cpu just doing > pointless PCM conversions. > > - Steve -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

[linux-audio-dev] all-purpose xplatform audio decoding library?

2006-04-25 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
a-nerd.com/libsndfile/ no ogg support only support for wav files i'm not fond of adding separate libs with different apis to access different audio codecs -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: python and jack, performance report

2006-03-23 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
entually call > malloc, which is explicitly discouraged in jack api doculentation. i'm aware of that. but that only means its not good for production code, but its fine for prototyping, as i already stated. -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org

[linux-audio-dev] python and jack, performance report

2005-12-11 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
est client contained for those who are interested. its not entirely wrapped and lacks some functionality. -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org import sys import ctypes import _ctypes from ctypes import c_uint, \ c_int, \ c_float, \ CFUNCT

[linux-audio-dev] python and jack, performance report

2005-12-11 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
some functionality. -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org import sys import ctypes import _ctypes from ctypes import c_uint, \ c_int, \ c_float, \ CFUNCTYPE, \ c_char_p, \ POINTER, \ byref, \ c_char, \ c_double,

[linux-audio-dev] reminder: LAD AI Composer Competition

2005-08-13 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
agh, sorry, wrong reply-to ;) http://www.paniq.org/index.php/AI_Composer_Competition -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.paniq.org -- http://www.mjoo.org

[linux-audio-dev] reminder: LAD AI Composer Competition

2005-08-13 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
http://www.paniq.org/index.php/AI_Composer_Competition -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.paniq.org -- http://www.mjoo.org

[linux-audio-dev] AI Composer Competition

2005-07-27 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
http://www.paniq.org/index.php/AI_Composer_Competition -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.paniq.org -- http://www.mjoo.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ogg vs mp3 fame discussion

2005-07-23 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
g very very successful, while "mozilla" isn't. i think one of the major reasons why firefox catched on is that the name sounds a lot better and that it came with a cute logo. simply by finding a good name, you can already save a lot of energy that you'd waste with hyping and marketing. i'll try to contact the vorbis people. maybe they can try a spin off :) -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.paniq.org -- http://www.mjoo.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] please help: enumerating library requirements

2005-07-23 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
is terrible, but its still possible to get it to run. ;) -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.paniq.org -- http://www.mjoo.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] please help: enumerating library requirements

2005-07-23 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
le. its still living off this fame. there has not been a real reason to switch to anything else because it was and still is "good enough". ogg vorbis is, in terms of quality, only "marginally" better. the problem is the name. it does not at all suggest that ogg vorbis is the new mp3. it's as simple as that. no marketing, no world domination. -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.paniq.org -- http://www.mjoo.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] please help: enumerating library requirements

2005-07-23 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
you have to chop up and merge the blocks that the lib gives you. if a lib guarantees to always mix as many samples as i require, it is out-of-the-box ready for blockwise streaming, even with small blocks of data. -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.paniq.org -- http://www.mjoo.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] please help: enumerating library requirements

2005-07-23 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:20, Lars Luthman wrote: > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 13:39 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > > if fraunhofer restricts the widespread use of its codec, mp3 will die. > > ogg vorbis is the better alternative, and the only reason why it hasn

Re: [linux-audio-dev] please help: enumerating library requirements

2005-07-23 Thread Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter
n to put mp3 to the grave. :D -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.paniq.org -- http://www.mjoo.org