On Monday 28 Oct 2002 14:20, Steve Harris wrote:
> Recorded in an anechoic chamber at 44.1/16, stored by octave and
> modulation.
>
> http://theremin.music.uiowa.edu/MIS.html
>
> "Please feel free to use these samples in your research or music projects
> without restriction. You may also cite as a
On Thursday 24 Oct 2002 18:32, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > I don't want to have to learn about DSPs and stuff to be able to identify
> > a _good_ sound card. I've currently got a shortlist for my ne
On Wednesday 23 Oct 2002 19:52, Eric Pouech wrote:
> - port routing will not be easily solved. for example, it will be hard
> to
> match dynamic aspect of JACK port creation/deletion (unless we break
> away from windows API)
Just to jump on this one point :-)... How does Windows handle hot plu
On Tuesday 22 Oct 2002 22:10, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> > When I run latencytest0.42-png from [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get about 99%
> > sub 2ms latency. But jack still complains of xruns of about 50ms.
> > There's something
On Tuesday 22 Oct 2002 23:22, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> >
> > Heh. Now, one of these I have in my machine ((PII vintage) Celeron 400)
> > already. The other would set me back £150. Your comment makes me think
> > there's li
On Tuesday 22 Oct 2002 22:07, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
Kai,
Many thanks for the reply.
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> > I don't want to have to learn about DSPs and stuff to be able to identify
> > a _good_ sound card. I've currently got a shortlist for my ne
On Tuesday 22 Oct 2002 20:27, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> >All these things just make life _easier_. I want to get on with
> >developing code, not wondering why my hardware isn't performing. I
> >don't _want_ to have to learn _that_ part of the system. Because I'll
> >only need to d
On Tuesday 22 Oct 2002 12:55, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
[snip]
> > JACK is not yet finished, and it has some definite usability issues
> > that need to be resolved. but it is not, and i hope will never be
> > (primarily) a general purpose sound server.
>
> In other words, development&testing help is welc
On Tuesday 22 Oct 2002 17:42, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:14:52AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I can't answer this properly, but there is some issue to with mmap mode I
> > believe. It is a very small number of cards that dont work.
>
> We should compile a list of them, and m
On Sunday 20 Oct 2002 21:38, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> > I also want to be able to do this on my current machine, a Celeron
> > 400. Jack won't run - my machine's too slow. MPlayer won't run - my
> > machine'
On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 21:49, nick wrote:
> Hi
>
> IMO running each synth in its own thread with many synths going is
> definitely _not_ the way forward. The host should definitely be the only
> process, much how VST, DXi, pro tools et. al. work.
>
> No, there is no real "instrument" or "synth" pl
On Thursday 10 Oct 2002 23:21, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
[snip]
> alsaplayer dies after i insert the second or third meter instance, but
> then i'm running 2.5.41 right now, and it seems to have some scheduling
> problems (i'm not even sure i correctly selected kernel pre-emption, so
> ignore me)
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 19:47, Peter L Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 17:44, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Fri, 27 Sep 2002 22:57:15 +0100,
> >
Argh - I meant to send this to Takashi not the list!
Sorry :-(
-- Peter
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 17:44, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 27 Sep 2002 22:57:15 +0100,
>
> Peter L Jones wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've tried to subscribe to Eric A Walsh's TiMidity mailing list but it
> > doesn't appear to be working... (
Hi all,
I've tried to subscribe to Eric A Walsh's TiMidity mailing list but it doesn't
appear to be working... (or there's too little latency in my patience...)
So... would anyone be even vaguely interested in...
a) an aRtsd patch (trivial, really)
b) an extension to the "order=o" soundfont
On Thursday 19 Sep 2002 04:10, Likai Liu wrote:
> I've been playing with TiMidity++ for a while, and hacked it a bit as
> well. For what I think, given the complexity of internals, it is not
> worth making TiMidity++ an LADSPA host and having to add some TiMidity++
> specific MIDI controller event
On Wednesday 18 Sep 2002 02:41, John Lazzaro wrote:
[snip]
> Identity Request/Identity Reply returns enough information
> for a patch editor to know what Manufacturer SysEx commands
> the device understands. Although a major undertaking, it is
> probably is in the realm of the doable to:
[...]
> I
On Wednesday 18 Sep 2002 07:26, Richard Bown wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 September 2002 01:50, David Olofson wrote:
> > I was thinking about CCs, Program Change and stuff. Is there a
> > standard way of asking a synth for the names of it's patches, or
> > which CCs are assigned to what, for example?
On Tuesday 17 Sep 2002 23:23, David Olofson wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 September 2002 20.33, Peter L Jones wrote:
[snip]
>
> > I was thinking it might be fun to have a midi sequencer with a
> > rather large library of MIDI controllers. I was thinking of using
> > Non-Regist
On Tuesday 17 Sep 2002 23:23, David Olofson wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 September 2002 20.33, Peter L Jones wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Do you (or the list) happen to know if anyone has considered making
> > TiMidity++ a LADSPA host?
>
> Can't remember hearing
Hi there,
Do you (or the list) happen to know if anyone has considered making TiMidity++
a LADSPA host?
I was thinking it might be fun to have a midi sequencer with a rather large
library of MIDI controllers. I was thinking of using Non-Registered
Parameters - one to select the LADSPA plug i
21 matches
Mail list logo
