On Wednesday 15 October 2003 11:51, Paul Davis wrote:
> >How about docs for the mixer interfaces? or a simple HOWTO.
>
> the mixer interface is a problem. OSS glosses over this by hiding 90%
> of the capabilities of most hardware mixers and stuffing it into an
> incredibly simplified model that the
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 03:19, Paul Davis wrote:
> >> OSS is dead. You should not be writing apps with
> >
> >OSS.
> >
> >Well, at least OSS has a programmer's guide (PDF
> >file):
> >http://www.opensound.com/pguide/oss.pdf
>
> For ALSA
>
>
> Initial HOWTO's:
>
> http://www.suse.de
On Friday 26 September 2003 10:42, Paul Davis wrote:
> amazing that these guys have the guts to show the screenshot ..
>
> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2003/Symbolic-Comp-5-Mod-Win.htlm
>
> looks like OpenMusic to me. i guess we're still waiting for the
> official release for linux from irc
On Thursday 14 August 2003 17:12, Paul Winkler wrote:
> Hi folks, your friendly temporary list-admin here.
> (Joern's on vacation and I'm filling in.)
>
> We seem to be getting quite a lot of spam lately.
> Currently the list is "open" - non-members can post.
>
> I'd like to take an informal poll:
Hello,
This is to announce a web forum dedicated to Linux and recording.
http://www.recording.org/cgi-local/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi
Come and join the fun!
neral public.
> --p
>
>
> ---
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> ___
> Alsa-devel mailing list
time to answer your questions because we too
> **DAMN BUSY** trying to get software to the point where non-coders can
> use it with satisfaction and ease, well ... go get products & support
> from companies that will happily take your money for both of
> them. There are plenty of good
1/17/2003 7:55:29 PM, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:30:48PM -0800, Paul Winkler wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:07:40AM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote:
>> > Check this out:
>> >
>> > - http://www.opnlabs.com/
>
>I've written them with a couple of basic que
don't want to have to resample the input, as it seems a waste of cpu, and as
a musician... blasphamy.
Any hints, or suggestions would be welcomed.
thanks,
ljp
--
My cat's a debugger
Potter, Lorn, "ljp"
core member / Web Administrator
Project OPIE- the Open Palmtop In
t bad :) I don't know about you studio
> people with all your "low latency, 10 in, 10 out, 24/96" gubbins, but my
> AWE has served me well :)
>
> Bob
It's not the equipment you have that really counts.. it's what you do with it!
--
My cat&#
At 02:06 PM 7/16/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Greetings:
>
> I've been traveling quite a lot lately, so I have not updated the
>Linux soundapps site for a couple of months. I'll be posting an update
>later this week, I promise. (!)
>
> Meanwhile, I'm happy to announce that my publisher has requeste
Sweet!
That means it'll also run on the Sharp Zaurus!
ljp
At 07:09 PM 3/7/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>I just finished porting ecasound to Compaq's iPAQ 3600, running the
>Familiar v0.5.1 Linux distribution. This is probably the first multitrack
>recording suite running on a PDA.
hello,
Is there any irc channels associated with this list? Or perhaps a channel
where audio dev programmers hang?
(added for grins) is the PCM_192,000_24bit_stereo file.
It was HUGE, so it's really short time-wise!
Like anybody is really going to use that sample rate! (yet)
:)
No other 32 bit files were available.
I even kept them under 100k bytes.
ljp
8
MS ADPCM
MS G.723.1
mp3
PCM
which ones do you want? What length?
Can't do multi channel
ljp
On Saturday 20 October 2001 11:06 am, you wrote:
> Didn't see anything about Linux there.
>
> Was this a joke?
no, go here.
to the linux forum..
http://www.recording.org/ubb/dawworld/ultimatebb.php?ubb=forum&f=26
Hear ye! Hear ye!! Come one! Come all!
Announcing a linux audio web forum at:
http://www.recording.org/cgi-local/ubb/dawworld/ultimatebb.cgi
ljp
On Sunday 30 September 2001 12:55 pm, you wrote:
> I've been happily using the commercial OSS driver (
> http://www.4front-tech.com ).
>
Ditto here. I'd rather spend my time recording/playing music than
compiling/configuring a sound card.
OSS commercial is rather painless.
ljp
27;t
point their fingers at when they themselves screw things up and not back up.
But, I'd hate to spend 36 hours rendering anything that turns out crappy
because of defects in the software.
If they outlaw open source, then only outlaws will have open source, and
they can pry my gnu compiler from my cold, dead harddrive.
ljp
At 14:33 9/7/2001 +0300, you wrote:
>Peter Surda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What's VST? I've contributed some stuff to the avifile project and we are
> > planning to integrate more binary codecs (QT, RealMedia), but it isn't top
> > priority now, so if "VST" is something interesting I could
At 11:36 8/21/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>1) How do you most typically use Cool Edit, i.e., what routines do you
>most commonly access ?
Noise reduction, DirectX plugins, FET Filter, Amplitude- dynamics, amplify,
and normalize.
>2) What do you consider CE's greatest strength as a soundfile editor
s tar balls. I have gotten to the point where if/when
I install a dist, I forget about installing anything X, or dev from them, and
just install from tarballs.
I guess thats a unix tradition, having several different incompatible distributions
available. I was hoping linux could overcome this, but it isn't happening.
ljp
7/26/2001 19:59:58, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ljp writes, in response to two criticisms of GNOME dependency:
>
>>To me, music is more important than any library ideologies. I wouldn't give
>>a rats ass if software was made with QBASIC, as long as
y
easily (not alot of excessive library inclusion that I have to install
every libtom-libdick-and-libharry libs just to compile it- because there no
binaries available), functions well, and serves the purpose that I use it
for. I'm willing to check out glame. I'll let ya know what I think about it.
ljp
24 matches
Mail list logo
