on laptops is to weak to get
any further than half a meter
Any ideas or advice appreciated
mimo
://mimo.gn.apc.org/quickwav/quickwav-0.1.tar.gz
The tarball contains source and binary version. It requires at least qt3,
libsndfile, jack.
On Saturday 04 June 2005 14:43, mimo wrote:
After my initial problems with jack I must say I have come to like jack.
Especially together with muse. Now I wonder
Hi James,
James McDermott wrote:
hi mimo,
are you thinking of something like buzz (or maybe max/msp) where audio
can be routed in a free-form network from sources (generators) to sink
(master output)? i'm a big fan of this idea.
You got me! I am a long term buzz user, used it for live gigs
Walco wrote:
Hi Mimo,
PS.: the paper is here http://mimo.gn.apc.org/mux/
First of all: nice initiative. But...
...why create a new modular audio framework, if you could
improve, harden and extend an existing one? Think of all that hairy GUI
code that you don't have to write and debug...
Well
Dave Phillips wrote:
Btw, mimo: Have you tried using Buzz under Linux ? I've had it working
quite nicely, it's a very impressive program, lots of fun. A native Buzz
would be most welcome.
I guess you mean under wine. I have but wasnt impressed with performance
(maybe I really should get
someone elses project :)
mimo
--
Please note that this account is being filtered using anti UCE systems.
If you send email to this account make sure that it could not be
mistaken as UCE.
Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 02:00:24 +, mimo wrote:
Paul Davis wrote:
complaining. But my experiences with jack are negative. First time I
started looking at it I had huge expectations after all that I had read.
First problems, after a couple of second of running without any
h/w are we talking about?
The only time I have heard of this happening is when people do something
stupid like trying to run JACK with an emu10k1 at 44100KHz.
No, happened with rme96 at 44.1kHz -- will try to reproduce tonight and
send you details.
mimo
Lee
--
Please note that this account
code too if that helps and would be grateful for any help.
Thanks
mimo
or the other form. After recent (non-rme, non-audio related)
frustrations I think there are even good reasons to form some sort of
platform or organisation for this. Something like a lobbying group but I
am probably reinventing the wheel and that already exists.
mimo
rme96 user
Marek Peteraj wrote
Hi,
I haven't looked at the latest versions of Fruity for a while but started
working on something that is quite similiar to your description in the
beginning of this year. I have now reached a certain level where the core
signaling engine becomes usable.
I don't know if you have ever worked
11 matches
Mail list logo
