On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:07:08AM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>Es geschah am Montag, 5. April 2004 23:33 als Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
>> Well me. I've been working on this since the start of the year, but
>> been thinking about the problem for over 10 years.
>
>Which brings me to the q
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:15:05PM +, J_Zar wrote:
>Mmmm... Could be a very improvement for the sound streching. I've some
>problem with SoundTouch (compiling and latency issues)... So I'm
>interested... but from what I can see from the project page, there is a
>"donate" form but no CVS or c
I see this machine has an ENE cardbus controller, for which
problems have been reported in the RME support newsgroup
@ nntp://news.x-networks.de/rme-audio
I do not know the full details of the problem, and I don't know
if your particular setup is affected, but there were at least some
cases report
Anyone else experiencing a mail loop with the latest
cross posted messages to LAD and LAU by Steve and Chris ?
regards,
v
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 03:24:05PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
>Matrox have just release a card designed for audio that has no fans (due
>to downclocked 3d processor) and lots of acceleration on all heads.
Which one ? :)
>Right, well in the meantime im doing it as optional - eg. I have an alpha
>v
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:14:53PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
>Hear hear. I think that GL accelration is a (potentially) important
>optimisation for audio apps - it saves a lot of cache and memory bandwidth
>that can be better used number-crunching audio.
Right.
>Paul is right that its a kludge,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:57:17PM -0500, Jesse Chappell wrote:
>BTW, i just ran JACK realtime on a T41p with the firegl T2 128MB,
>using the ati 3.7.0 drivers on a 2.4.22 PE/LL kernel with no problems.
>Alsa 0.9.8 using the builtin audio (snd-intel8x0). the machine
>itself has 512MB of RAM.
Grea
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:31:10AM -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Machine is an 800 MHz AMD w. 512 MB RAM, system is Planet CCRMA RH 9.
>Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated. I haven't had this
>kind of noise problem before now, I'd certainly like to get rid of it,
>and I'm willin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote:
>I'm running quite happily with DRI enabled on my ATI card now, the problem was
>definitely that it was trying to lock too much memory.
Ok. I assume that you have a Firegl T2 with 128Mb Ram (using the ATI 3.7.0 drivers) ?
>Since sh
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>its a basic problem with real time software, the POSIX API etc.
>JACK tries to lock *all* the process memory.
This is to ensure that nothing gets swapped out, right ?
Else it is very hard to ensure real time performance ?
(sorry for bei
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:58:49PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
>I remember seeing that page a little while back, I'll definately look
>into it.. looks pretty crazy!
It definitely looks great.
I want to test it too.
>(If it's based on portaudio can I still connect it to my jack graph
>somehow? N
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>the implementation of DRI by certain video interface drivers means
>that we end up trying to lock the video memory as well, and this tends
>to fail for various reasons.
Hm, that sounds bad.
Does this problem also happen with the open sou
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:19:55PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
>Now that ATI has gone the way of Nvidia I don't know who to pledge
>allegiance to. :)
>Is Matrox still friendly?
I would say that there is still hope as far as ATI is concerned.
They are delivering specs to the Linuxbios people, so t
Do you use the Radeon binary driver ?
v
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:26:20PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
>Through a painful process I'd rather not go into, I discovered that Jack
>will not run in realtime mode with my Radeon's 3d drivers loaded.. I get
>the error "cannot lock down memory for RT th
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:32:36PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
>Er, yes. I think this can be left up to the submitters discression.
>eg. http://freshmeat.net/projects/sweep/
>looking at that I guess you would want
>required-package and recommended-package being sub-properties of depends-on
I know t
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:41:06PM +0100, Martijn Sipkema wrote:
>[...]
>> Xinerama _does_ support open GL, at least with my matrox card, I can have
>> openGL on one monitor of the two. That is a limitation of the card
>> hardware, AFAIK, not of X.
>
>I doubt this is a hardware limitation. The hard
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 04:53:25PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
>Yes, thats a serious problem. Any idea if XFree plan to fix that?
I know there is 'mergedfb', which should fix that.
I don't know if it is more than a hack though.
v
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:12:21PM +0100, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
>yees! puh-leeze.
>everybody have a coffee.
>or better yet, some herbal tea :-D
Isn't theine as bad as caffeine ? ;)
No drink wars please :p
v
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:12:24AM +, Steve Harris wrote:
>I guess the more of us who buy them the quicker the endianness problems
>will be fixed, ppc-linux-audio-user? :)
:) I was thinking along the same lines ;)
v
I am contemplating buying a laptop of some sort, to develop on.
I was wondering how many of you are using an x86 laptop and how
many are using a ppc laptop :)
It looks to me as if Apples laptops are rock solid and don't suffer
from buggy ACPI to start with. Or is this extra quality just a myth ?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:03:06PM +0200, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
>Hello. Who of us are working on a modular synth GUI where user
>grab&drag modules and connects them with cables? I'm myself
>interested in the editor GUI development --- there already
>are many modular audio engines, but not particu
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS3468265897.html
Looks cool. A little proprietary, but it seems to have an SDK.
vini
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Love Bucket wrote:
>Where is the equivalent for ALSA? Until it exists, we
>will continue using OSS!
http://www.alsa-project.org/documentation.php3
Or do you really want *.pdf ?
There are tools for that.
v
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:44:32AM -0700, Love Bucket wrote:
>> You should not be writing apps with OSS.
>> If you want portability use PortAudio.
>
>LOL! PortAudio uses... OSS!
Read http://www.portaudio.com/docs/proposals/status.html
Find alsa, oss and jack.
Note that way more functionality is a
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:48:38AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>its of less interest. perhaps zero. george anzinger's project at
>sf.net is definitely the one. read recent messages in the mailing list
>archive for an overview of what's going to be involved in using this
>stuff.
Will do !
vini
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:23:47AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>>Open source is a bit slower to move, but at least it sticks around!
>
>So true. Anyway, at least there will be a patch; the most recent one
>for 2.4.20 just came out.
You mean: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ ?
I just
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:03:33AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
>I haven't used kernel 2.5/2.6 for any audio stuff yet. I'm at the Linux
>Symposium this week - do we have any requests or gripes with 2.6 that I can
>relay to the core kernel guys? Audio is a workload they don't really test.
I'm not an
Dual licensing might be an option too ?
I'm not really an expert on it though :)
Anyone know the ins and outs of dual licensing ?
v
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:19:21PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
>My point exactly :-).
>Just to add a bit onto this issue is that we could still support
>non-opensource systems, but they would need to purchase the software
>(see my other e-mail with the Trolltech as an example).
Dual licensing is a
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:53:38PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
(cut)
>-- a unified and powerful underlying framework. Yet, that is not what
>we're working on right now...
I noted a lot of Mac OS X projects making use of libsndfile already.
The common Unix base is a huge step forward.
Now there are 2
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:22:37PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
>However this brings up one interesting point/problem. Due to GPL nature
>of Linux software, many of our efforts will seamlessly bleed into OS X
>world since there are no restrictions as to which platform this software
>is run on, and Ap
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:12:37AM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote:
>Hi! i'm doing some studying on dsp, and one thing I could never properly
>understand is the term of "excitation signal" I seem to find it associated
>to environment or natural sources, but I cant really find a definition.
>Could someo
What I do know about this, is that it is illegal from the VST SDK
license point of view to redistribute their headers with some GPL sources,
so the end user has to download the SDK with the headers included, to be able
to compile your plugin with VST support, if you license it GPL.
I don't think
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:30:52AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>Agreed. There are a number of ways to solve this, but sadly they all
>require a significant ammount of effort, and there are always some
>importnat things to be done...
>A laso kinda like the UI melange effect you get on VST systems, th
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:19:02AM +0200, Jay Vaughan wrote:
(cut)
>Linux has all the right ingredients for a good general-purpose audio
>i/o processing platform. The API's are fresh and well thought out,
>and expanding rapidly to accomodate the needs of performance app
>writers.
Knowing that y
http://www.sequencer.de/neuron/neuronal.html
This synth has a mainboard running Linux inside :)
Seems like not only Stanton (Final Scratch) is relying on
Linux in the pro audio world these days ..
regards,
Vincent
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:53:05AM -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
>Greetings:
> Just a note to mention that the Karlsruhe report has had 3,871 reads
>so far, more than any other article listed except for the Ultimate Linux
>Box on-line project. Seems like maybe people are really interested in
>what y
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:36:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>i remember i have read a statement about a lock free ringbuffer
>implemented in C somewhere.
>Can anybody remeber it ?
I think it is in the Ardour sources ?
I will try to hunt down the relevant post.
regards,
v
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 05:36:13PM +0900, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
(cut)
>Apart from that IMO the amount of money spent is useful to know from a
>business POV. If 6 months of clicking can generate $450 for Google then
>we must be able to channel that more effectively into LAD projects.
I guess you
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:33:24PM -0500, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
>Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to compile out of
>CVS) to redistribute my/our compiled version?
I think this is covered by section 6 in the GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
6. Each time you redistribu
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:49:08AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
(cut)
>jazz++ has been around for a long time, and is available as a
>binary. why isn't it widely loved and used? because it really isn't
>very good. i know that i tried to use it many times, and found it,
>well, frankly i found it complet
>and the rest ... I get this. Its pathetic. Not only that ... I have no
>idea how much longer I can keep working on Ardour right now because
>working on it has come close to exhausting my financial
>resources.
Paul, could you tell me how I can support you financially ?
Do you work through Paypal
I'm not a "real coder" either (so one might argue I shouldn't be on
linux-audio-dev, but I'm just interested in the discussions), so I think
I understand the root cause of your grief.
I think if (if) the Ardour developers are _expecting_ quality feedback
from normal users (not just programmers) at
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:42:35PM +0100, Pieter Palmers wrote:
>Anyone from Belgium planning to go? I'd like to attend this, maybe we
>could 'join forces'?
>(Vincent?)
Yep, I was planning to :)
I haven't figured out how to survive the weekend in terms
of sleep and food, but the motivation is pr
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:04:40AM +0100, Pieter Palmers wrote:
(cut)
>What I think could be possible is using (writing a driver for) the
>scratchamp with OSS or ALSA drivers, as they seem to be USB soundcards
>by creative. Those will have standard chipsets.
>But that wasn't the question I guess.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 04:02:59PM +0100, Modnogg wrote:
(cut)
>Do you think it's possible to route the USB sound cards to my internal
>sound cards?
>I could use the sound driver library from linux. But my problem is how
>to link the software to other soundcards?
(cut)
Here you can find out how to
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:30:45AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>IMO the *worst* possible scenario is that the commercial companies (many of
>whom are a one man show) decide that they want to join the MMA, while a
>sizeable group of others decide to persue a parallel effort. That gives us
>2 st
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 04:19:28PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote:
>Interesting reply :)
>I was going to write a boatload of stuff, but I can put it more
>concisely (I think I have this from the latest Linux Journal or some
>other magazine or online article).
"concisely": o
Interesting reply :)
I was going to write a boatload of stuff, but I can put it more
concisely (I think I have this from the latest Linux Journal or some
other magazine or online article).
Linux and the opensource movement in general is a very disruptive
technology, its an enabler. People want to
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 04:26:02PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
>I thought I'd pipe up here, as I use jack on a totally unpatched, untuned
>system (with SCHED_FIFO) and get rock solid performance. All crashes etc have
>so far been problems with my code :)
It should provide to be useful if we could
Check this out:
- http://www.opnlabs.com/
- http://www.opnlabs.com/ekochart.php
[comes with XP or LINUX !]
Does anyone know more about this synth ?
It really strikes me that you can choose
between XP or Linux, its just great :)
regards
v
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:01:44PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
(cut)
>also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please critique this:
>http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf
Read it and the only thing I could come up with,
was an extra hyphen, which is undecided in English anyway :)
[twent
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:12:47PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
[cut]
>The way I read Paul's note they are not restricted, therefore they are
>public. Wouldn't want to drive that far and find out differently.
[cut]
Not sure whether this fits in here,
but I thought it might be interesting.
I forward
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 04:46:19PM -0800, Josh Green wrote:
(cut)
>I remember something similar being discussed on LAD a while back (but I
>think it was about networking of Linux Audio prefessionals for contracts
>and jobs, correct me if I'm wrong), perhaps this idea could be added to
>that same da
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 05:34:22PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
(cut)
>thanks to erik, thanks to RMS for the GPL and thanks to everybody on
>this list and elsewhere who is making this revolution possible.
>--p
I'm glowing too :)
Don't have the time right now to use all the great apps,
but just readi
Hi folks,
First of all a happy x-mas
and newyear :)
I was just wondering if some of you
had considered using / implementing /
testing the new x-dnd (X Drag and
Drop) specification ?
http://www.newplanetsoftware.com/xdnd/
It seems very useful. It would be great
if we could just drag and drop aud
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:29:09PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
(cut)
>when playing tintal. they don't. its logically divided into 4 parts:
>
> da-dhin-dhin-da
> da-dhin-dhin-da
> da-tin-tin-na
> na-dhin-dhin-da
(cut)
Suddenly, I understand more of the Kruder and
Dorfmeister LP I reall
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 11:10:40PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>i don't want to blow my moderator points this time, so get busy. there
>is lots of confusion, mis-information and general cluelessness in the
>responses so far. get to it, provide me with some stuff to moderate
>upward ...
>--p
I use Deb
Wow, please do :)
I'm immensely interested.
best regards
vincent
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:34:59PM +0200, CK wrote:
>I read:
>> How well does it work? Does it truly work just like a standard turntable setup
>> would, or does it have an artificial feel or sound to it?
>
>dunno about final scrat
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:01:24PM +0200, Peter Hanappe wrote:
>We're thinking of adding a .wav loader to iiwusynth. In that
>case you won't need to convert it to a soundfont before hand.
>I can't give you a date when this feature will be available,
>though.
Nice :)
I'll be looking forward to it.
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:39:07AM -0700, Brian Redfern wrote:
>Soundfonts are based on normal samples, they just give you control over
>envelope paramters so you can use midi to control extra parameters, like
>use velocity to alter cut off. I'm working on my own personal library
>right now with v
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:15:57AM -0700, Brian Redfern wrote:
>IIwusynth is really nice and performs well, its a soundfont software
>sampler, and swamii is a soundfont editor that uses it for its engine. I
>get good realtime playback on my laptop and have access to tons of
>soundfonts on cdrom.
Hi,
I ask this question here because I know
a lot of you manage to install lots of
applications from a fresh cvs snaphot
without troubles (I think ;).
How do you manage these from-source installs ?
Are there people who use stow ?
[cfr. http://www.gnu.org/software/stow/stow.html]
Or does make i
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 02:22:35PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
(cut)
>2) is cheap, the patch exists, and we should consider promoting it as
> widely as the low latency patches.
(cut)
Ok, let the lobbying begin :)
v
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:31:22PM +0200, Tobias Ulbricht wrote:
>Rediculus!
>where has tolerance, hospitality and an unbiased attitude towards others
>gone that this list had so far?
ACK.
I have been upset by some messages on this list too.
I didn't want to react as it seemed like
*an utter wast
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:18:54AM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
(cut)
>Price: We got them donated, but they cost about half a car, if
> you get them new, we have been told.
That would be a showstopper for me :)
1000$ is one thing, but I cannot afford 2500$+
It seems interesting though.
I'll let y
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:25:45PM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
(cut)
Ok, I grasp your intent,
its a good idea.
Letting a DSP idle is not the best idea,
so if you can use it for specific computations,
that would be nice.
>> Could you tell me exactly what you would
>> do with this board and how that
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
(cut)
>Give our project a sample board, a data sheet and some time then
>we'll integrate it into our Linux-DSP-Project.
(cut)
I read your paper and it interests me to say the least.
The thing that is driving me to use the Chameleon
is it
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
>Give our project a sample board, a data sheet and some time then
>we'll integrate it into our Linux-DSP-Project.
>You can find it under
> http://osg.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/forschung/linux+dsp/index.html
I'm not sure I fully grasp t
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
(cut)
>The Chameleon isn't quite as convienent as it can't be applied in-line as
>part of a LADSPA/JACK chain.
(cut)
Wait for the digital IO in the next version :)
Sure this is possible now too, but
with extra D/A -> A/D -> Chameleon
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:44:38PM +0200, Sebastien Metrot wrote:
>Mine does :-) , but have you listened to the sample soundclips (the opera
>singer)? It sounds so bad I wonder how they expect to sell anything with
>such material.
Here it sounds good actually :)
Also expect loss of quality due t
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:04:45PM +0200, wires wrote:
>> Very much so :)
>As a related question, how does this machine's speed compare to, say, a
>modern pc (apart from the advantages of having a display etc)?
That's comparing pears to apples ...
The DSP runs at 100 Mhz, but its a *dedicated*
pr
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
(cut)
>Anyway, that thing looks usable.
(cut)
Very much so :)
v
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:52:47PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
Well, it uses a standard motorola dsp.
I'm sure you can find a suitable compiler.
Then you only need an editor and a way
to send your data over in sysex.
Shoul
http://www.soundart-hot.com/developers1.htm
Remembering past threads, i know
some of you have wanted to create
a fully programmable DSP engine.
Well, it has been done.
Separate DSP & controller,
fully programmable display and IO.
SDK and everything needed to
program the beast are given
away for
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:48:02AM +0100, Nick Bailey wrote:
(cut)
>This is of course a gross abuse of the rights of the purchaser to "fair
>use", and I hope that people, especially readers of this list, would no
>more think of buying them than they would of supporting, e.g., the
>Microsoft mon
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 02:07:20PM -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
(cut)
>Well, I've never had any problems with cdparanoia, but the web page
>is full of Real Soon Now hype for "Paranoia IV" which will have a
>library and API for others to use.
(cut)
:) I guess they forgot then
>I guess the Xiph boys h
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 11:49:14AM -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
>http://www.xiph.org/paranoia
>What's going on with that project? The web page has been stagnant for
>two years.
Feature complete / no more bugs ? :)
regards
v
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 03:39:11PM -0700, Andrew W. Schmeder wrote:
(cut)
>features", e.g. cell arrays, better object support, java integration. However
>these days I recommend Python with Numeric/Scientific/SciPy extensions over
>Octave (and over Matlab). In addition to Python's unquestionably
Maybe we should check out if
they are seeking to actively
sponsore software audio projects ;)
vincent
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 12:24:56AM +0100, Phil Kerr wrote:
(cut)
>It's a very simple protocol to use and it seems to work fine on a LAN. It
>can also handle the saving and restoring of app config data by broadcasting
>it's config as XML.
(cut)
Just thinking out lout :)
If you use this on the 127
Yamaha has a large NDA tradition,
making lots of things impossible.
As another example: the filesystem
format of their A series samples storage.
It would be so nice if you could mount
these disks in Linux too, but yammy
refuses without an NDA ...
Ask them the question though :)
They have to com
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 01:14:18PM -0500, Arthur Peters wrote:
(cut)
>I think there might be problems with option 1 when the apps are running
>on different machines (as was mensioned earlier). Maybe a hybrid would
>work: provide an API for each app to pass it's data to the project
>server. This da
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 02:00:15PM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote:
(cut)
>Yes, I agree that midi sucks. I'm wondering why dont we have
>a newer protocol by now, but we dont. So there's nothing else
>than having to stick to that archaic crap :)
(cut)
What about Yamaha's mLan ?
I thought that was som
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 07:38:25PM +0200, Martijn Sipkema wrote:
(cut)
>Using UST would also enable syncing to video or some other media
>stream without it all residing in the same API.
(cut)
That would certainly make me very happy :)
vini
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 02:09:32PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
(cut)
>Yes, It's terrible. I remeber hearing from someone a year or so ago,
>who was incharge of cleaning up the source. I never heard any more though.
Well he had to clean it up,
I guess he just escaped and ran away ;)
vini
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:07:43AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
>Does this help?
>http://developer.gnome.org/arch/sm/extension.html
(cut)
>"_GSM_Priority
(cut)
So their would be a dependency on gnome-session-manager
(and what else ?)
regards
vini
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 04:56:06AM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote:
>And also you cant do the neat thing of asking all your apps to save
>all their data
>to a directory so you can create a targzip with the project :)
That point is irrelevant,
you can extract everything from
the database and tar gzip
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 08:43:36AM +0200, n++k wrote:
>Why not use an SQL database for storing session/project metadata?
>(configuration and such) We have the benefit of having a few quite
>stable free software SQL databases. (mysql, postgresql, sapdb) so
>requiring one wouldn't be too much to ask
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 02:30:22AM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote:
>ok, but the question is, what for? What else do you need other than
>start/stop/seek ? doesnt midi proovide that already? then why
>something else?
>Also using midi you make sure that what you do is synced to external
>devices...
Yo
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 01:17:53AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
>actually zipi and skini.
>tooskini has something to do with perry cook's STK.
I though skini is just readable MIDI ?
Hit me if I'm wrong though.
regards
vini
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:56PM -0500, Arthur Peters wrote:
(cut)
>MIDI is very powerful, but it is also very
>restrictive in some ways.
Yep, think of 0-127 ranges for controller data :(
That is too coarse;
>Just a thought. I don't know much about these subjects.
Well I'm not an expert either
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:41:45PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Juan Linietsky wrote:
(cut)
>Loading all the necessary programs with the links between them restored
>and the individual program files loaded as well? I think JACK would be a
>good place for this. I proposed som
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:17:27PM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote:
(cut)
>How do you think the implementation should be? I cant think of much,
>but
>i think even a simple communication protocol that can send
>tree-organized data
>between apps over either tcp or unix sockets should be enough.. Also
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:44:00PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 05:18:46PM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote:
>> I think this can be solved by developing a metadata protocol between
>> apps, so the can intercommunicate
>> status and other things, and having a "master" app that man
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 05:11:06AM +0200, Torben Hohn wrote:
>BTW:
>I consider XML to be bloat.
At least it is portable bloat ;)
No, seriously, xml has advantages over plain ascii,
when you consider xslt, rdf, ... etc etc
regards
vini
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 02:40:36AM +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Paul Winkler wrote:
>
>>> Without breaking binary compatibility,
>> Can someone explain to me why that's important at this point in time?
>
>Well, it's not _that_ important, but there are a few good reasons...
>
>1
Yum,
can't wait till 2.6 hits the streets :)
vincent
>RTC is still more accurate, but on the other hand, you don't need root
>privileges to take advantage of the 1kHz ticks!
>
>--
> http://www.eca.cx
> Audio software for Linux!
>
>
Nope, not yet,
I'm on my way though to join you :)
Not everyone likes irc though,
and that's ok :)
regards
Vini
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 02:59:30PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote:
>I've been looking around for IRC channels populated by lad people but to
>no avail. Have I missed a place, or is there none?
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
